Cargando…

Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse

BACKGROUND: Cancer outcome is associated with circulating immune cells, including eosinophils. Here we analyze the relative eosinophil count (REC) in different breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: Stage I–III breast cancer patients were included in the study and classified as REC-high vs low (cutoff 1.5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onesti, Concetta Elisa, Josse, Claire, Boulet, Delphine, Thiry, Jérôme, Beaumecker, Barbara, Bours, Vincent, Jerusalem, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1761176
_version_ 1783576232657420288
author Onesti, Concetta Elisa
Josse, Claire
Boulet, Delphine
Thiry, Jérôme
Beaumecker, Barbara
Bours, Vincent
Jerusalem, Guy
author_facet Onesti, Concetta Elisa
Josse, Claire
Boulet, Delphine
Thiry, Jérôme
Beaumecker, Barbara
Bours, Vincent
Jerusalem, Guy
author_sort Onesti, Concetta Elisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer outcome is associated with circulating immune cells, including eosinophils. Here we analyze the relative eosinophil count (REC) in different breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: Stage I–III breast cancer patients were included in the study and classified as REC-high vs low (cutoff 1.5%) or relative lymphocyte count (RLC)-high vs low (cutoff 17.5%). The co-primary endpoints were the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) or the time to treatment failure (TTF) in the REC groups. RESULTS: Overall 930 patients were included in the study. We observed a benefit for REC-high vs REC-low in TTF (HR 0.610, 95% CI 0.458–0.812), and in BCSS (HR 0.632, 95% CI 0.433–0.923). Similarly, we observed a better TTF (HR 0.421, 95% CI 0.262–0.677) and BCSS (HR 0.350, 95% CI 0.200–0.614) in RLC-high vs low. A lower relapse rate was observed in the REC-high vs REC-low group (17.1% vs 24.7%, p = 0.005), not confirmed in the multivariate analysis. A lower median REC at baseline and at relapse was observed compared to REC after surgery and during cancer-free follow-up (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: REC could be a new promising, affordable and accessible predictive and prognostic biomarker in all breast cancer subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7458605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74586052020-09-11 Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse Onesti, Concetta Elisa Josse, Claire Boulet, Delphine Thiry, Jérôme Beaumecker, Barbara Bours, Vincent Jerusalem, Guy Oncoimmunology Original Research BACKGROUND: Cancer outcome is associated with circulating immune cells, including eosinophils. Here we analyze the relative eosinophil count (REC) in different breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: Stage I–III breast cancer patients were included in the study and classified as REC-high vs low (cutoff 1.5%) or relative lymphocyte count (RLC)-high vs low (cutoff 17.5%). The co-primary endpoints were the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) or the time to treatment failure (TTF) in the REC groups. RESULTS: Overall 930 patients were included in the study. We observed a benefit for REC-high vs REC-low in TTF (HR 0.610, 95% CI 0.458–0.812), and in BCSS (HR 0.632, 95% CI 0.433–0.923). Similarly, we observed a better TTF (HR 0.421, 95% CI 0.262–0.677) and BCSS (HR 0.350, 95% CI 0.200–0.614) in RLC-high vs low. A lower relapse rate was observed in the REC-high vs REC-low group (17.1% vs 24.7%, p = 0.005), not confirmed in the multivariate analysis. A lower median REC at baseline and at relapse was observed compared to REC after surgery and during cancer-free follow-up (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: REC could be a new promising, affordable and accessible predictive and prognostic biomarker in all breast cancer subtypes. Taylor & Francis 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7458605/ /pubmed/32923121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1761176 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Onesti, Concetta Elisa
Josse, Claire
Boulet, Delphine
Thiry, Jérôme
Beaumecker, Barbara
Bours, Vincent
Jerusalem, Guy
Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse
title Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse
title_full Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse
title_fullStr Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse
title_full_unstemmed Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse
title_short Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse
title_sort blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1761176
work_keys_str_mv AT onesticoncettaelisa bloodeosinophilicrelativecountisprognosticforbreastcancerandassociatedwiththepresenceoftumoratdiagnosisandattimeofrelapse
AT josseclaire bloodeosinophilicrelativecountisprognosticforbreastcancerandassociatedwiththepresenceoftumoratdiagnosisandattimeofrelapse
AT bouletdelphine bloodeosinophilicrelativecountisprognosticforbreastcancerandassociatedwiththepresenceoftumoratdiagnosisandattimeofrelapse
AT thiryjerome bloodeosinophilicrelativecountisprognosticforbreastcancerandassociatedwiththepresenceoftumoratdiagnosisandattimeofrelapse
AT beaumeckerbarbara bloodeosinophilicrelativecountisprognosticforbreastcancerandassociatedwiththepresenceoftumoratdiagnosisandattimeofrelapse
AT boursvincent bloodeosinophilicrelativecountisprognosticforbreastcancerandassociatedwiththepresenceoftumoratdiagnosisandattimeofrelapse
AT jerusalemguy bloodeosinophilicrelativecountisprognosticforbreastcancerandassociatedwiththepresenceoftumoratdiagnosisandattimeofrelapse