Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review
Background and study aims Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection (Eo-EFTR) without laparoscopic assistance is a minimally invasive natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique that has shown promising efficacy and safety in resection of gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs) a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1198-4357 |
_version_ | 1783576262593216512 |
---|---|
author | Granata, Antonino Martino, Alberto Amata, Michele Ligresti, Dario Tuzzolino, Fabio Traina, Mario |
author_facet | Granata, Antonino Martino, Alberto Amata, Michele Ligresti, Dario Tuzzolino, Fabio Traina, Mario |
author_sort | Granata, Antonino |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection (Eo-EFTR) without laparoscopic assistance is a minimally invasive natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique that has shown promising efficacy and safety in resection of gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs) arising from muscularis propria (MP). However, data on the efficacy and safety of gastric Eo-EFTR mostly come from relatively small retrospective studies and concern regarding its use still exists. The aim of our systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of gastric Eo-EFTR without laparoscopic assistance. Methods A detailed MEDLINE and EMBASE search was performed for papers published from January 1998 to November 2019 and reporting on gastric Eo-EFTR without laparoscopic assistance. The search strategy used the terms “endoscopic full thickness resection” and “gastric” or “stomach”. The primary outcomes were complete resection and surgical conversion rates. The secondary outcomes were overall major adverse events, delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, peritonitis, abdominal abscess and/or abdominal infection and successful Eo-EFTR. Results Fifteen Asian studies were included in our final review, providing data on 750 Eo-EFTR-treated G-SMTs. The per-lesion rate of complete resection and surgical conversion were 98.8 %\0.8 %, respectively. The per-lesion rate of major adverse events, delayed bleeding, delayed perforation and peritonitis, abdominal abscess and/or abdominal infection was 1.6 %\0.5 %\0.1 %\0.9 %, respectively. The per-lesion rate of successful Eo-EFTR (i. e. complete tumor resection and effective endoscopic defect closure) was 98.3 %. Conclusions Eo-EFTR without laparoscopic assistance appears to be highly effective and safe NOTES for removing deep G-SMTs, particularly those arising from MP layer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7458762 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74587622020-09-03 Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review Granata, Antonino Martino, Alberto Amata, Michele Ligresti, Dario Tuzzolino, Fabio Traina, Mario Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection (Eo-EFTR) without laparoscopic assistance is a minimally invasive natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique that has shown promising efficacy and safety in resection of gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs) arising from muscularis propria (MP). However, data on the efficacy and safety of gastric Eo-EFTR mostly come from relatively small retrospective studies and concern regarding its use still exists. The aim of our systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of gastric Eo-EFTR without laparoscopic assistance. Methods A detailed MEDLINE and EMBASE search was performed for papers published from January 1998 to November 2019 and reporting on gastric Eo-EFTR without laparoscopic assistance. The search strategy used the terms “endoscopic full thickness resection” and “gastric” or “stomach”. The primary outcomes were complete resection and surgical conversion rates. The secondary outcomes were overall major adverse events, delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, peritonitis, abdominal abscess and/or abdominal infection and successful Eo-EFTR. Results Fifteen Asian studies were included in our final review, providing data on 750 Eo-EFTR-treated G-SMTs. The per-lesion rate of complete resection and surgical conversion were 98.8 %\0.8 %, respectively. The per-lesion rate of major adverse events, delayed bleeding, delayed perforation and peritonitis, abdominal abscess and/or abdominal infection was 1.6 %\0.5 %\0.1 %\0.9 %, respectively. The per-lesion rate of successful Eo-EFTR (i. e. complete tumor resection and effective endoscopic defect closure) was 98.3 %. Conclusions Eo-EFTR without laparoscopic assistance appears to be highly effective and safe NOTES for removing deep G-SMTs, particularly those arising from MP layer. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-09 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7458762/ /pubmed/32904958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1198-4357 Text en Owner and Copyright © https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Granata, Antonino Martino, Alberto Amata, Michele Ligresti, Dario Tuzzolino, Fabio Traina, Mario Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review |
title | Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of gastric exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance: a systematic review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1198-4357 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT granataantonino efficacyandsafetyofgastricexposedendoscopicfullthicknessresectionwithoutlaparoscopicassistanceasystematicreview AT martinoalberto efficacyandsafetyofgastricexposedendoscopicfullthicknessresectionwithoutlaparoscopicassistanceasystematicreview AT amatamichele efficacyandsafetyofgastricexposedendoscopicfullthicknessresectionwithoutlaparoscopicassistanceasystematicreview AT ligrestidario efficacyandsafetyofgastricexposedendoscopicfullthicknessresectionwithoutlaparoscopicassistanceasystematicreview AT tuzzolinofabio efficacyandsafetyofgastricexposedendoscopicfullthicknessresectionwithoutlaparoscopicassistanceasystematicreview AT trainamario efficacyandsafetyofgastricexposedendoscopicfullthicknessresectionwithoutlaparoscopicassistanceasystematicreview |