Cargando…

Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance

BACKGROUND: The existence of metabolic adaptation, at the level of resting metabolic rate (RMR), remains highly controversial, likely due to lack of standardization of participants’ energy balance. Moreover, its role as a driver of relapse remains unproven. OBJECTIVE: The main aim was to determine i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Catia, Gower, Barbara A, Hill, James O, Hunter, Gary R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32386226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa086
_version_ 1783576263773913088
author Martins, Catia
Gower, Barbara A
Hill, James O
Hunter, Gary R
author_facet Martins, Catia
Gower, Barbara A
Hill, James O
Hunter, Gary R
author_sort Martins, Catia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The existence of metabolic adaptation, at the level of resting metabolic rate (RMR), remains highly controversial, likely due to lack of standardization of participants’ energy balance. Moreover, its role as a driver of relapse remains unproven. OBJECTIVE: The main aim was to determine if metabolic adaptation at the level of RMR was present after weight loss and at 1- and 2-y follow-up, with measurements taken under condition of weight stability. A secondary aim was to investigate race differences in metabolic adaptation after weight loss and if this phenomenon was associated with weight regain. METHODS: A total of 171 overweight women [BMI (kg/m(2)): 28.3 ± 1.3; age: 35.2 ± 6.3 y; 88 whites and 83 blacks] enrolled in a weight-loss program to achieve a BMI <25, and were followed for 2 y. Body weight and composition (4-compartment model) and RMR (indirect calorimetry) were measured after 4 wk of weight stability at baseline, after weight loss and at 1 and 2 y. Metabolic adaptation was defined as a significantly lower measured compared with predicted RMR (from own regression model). RESULTS: Participants lost, on average, 12 ± 2.6 kg and regained 52% ± 38% and 89% ± 54% of their initial weight lost at 1 and 2 y follow-up, respectively. Metabolic adaptation was found after weight loss (−54 ± 105 kcal/d; P < 0.001), with no difference between races and was positively correlated with fat-mass loss, but not with weight regain, overall. In a subset of women (n = 46) with data at all time points, metabolic adaptation was present after weight loss, but not at 1- or 2-y follow-up (−43 ± 119, P = 0.019; −18 ± 134, P = 0.380; and − 19 ± 166, P = 0.438 kcal/day respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In overweight women, metabolic adaptation at the level of RMR is minimal when measurements are taken under conditions of weight stability and does not predict weight regain up to 2 years follow-up. The JULIET study is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00067873 as NCT00067873.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7458773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74587732020-09-04 Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance Martins, Catia Gower, Barbara A Hill, James O Hunter, Gary R Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: The existence of metabolic adaptation, at the level of resting metabolic rate (RMR), remains highly controversial, likely due to lack of standardization of participants’ energy balance. Moreover, its role as a driver of relapse remains unproven. OBJECTIVE: The main aim was to determine if metabolic adaptation at the level of RMR was present after weight loss and at 1- and 2-y follow-up, with measurements taken under condition of weight stability. A secondary aim was to investigate race differences in metabolic adaptation after weight loss and if this phenomenon was associated with weight regain. METHODS: A total of 171 overweight women [BMI (kg/m(2)): 28.3 ± 1.3; age: 35.2 ± 6.3 y; 88 whites and 83 blacks] enrolled in a weight-loss program to achieve a BMI <25, and were followed for 2 y. Body weight and composition (4-compartment model) and RMR (indirect calorimetry) were measured after 4 wk of weight stability at baseline, after weight loss and at 1 and 2 y. Metabolic adaptation was defined as a significantly lower measured compared with predicted RMR (from own regression model). RESULTS: Participants lost, on average, 12 ± 2.6 kg and regained 52% ± 38% and 89% ± 54% of their initial weight lost at 1 and 2 y follow-up, respectively. Metabolic adaptation was found after weight loss (−54 ± 105 kcal/d; P < 0.001), with no difference between races and was positively correlated with fat-mass loss, but not with weight regain, overall. In a subset of women (n = 46) with data at all time points, metabolic adaptation was present after weight loss, but not at 1- or 2-y follow-up (−43 ± 119, P = 0.019; −18 ± 134, P = 0.380; and − 19 ± 166, P = 0.438 kcal/day respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In overweight women, metabolic adaptation at the level of RMR is minimal when measurements are taken under conditions of weight stability and does not predict weight regain up to 2 years follow-up. The JULIET study is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00067873 as NCT00067873. Oxford University Press 2020-09 2020-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7458773/ /pubmed/32386226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa086 Text en Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Communications
Martins, Catia
Gower, Barbara A
Hill, James O
Hunter, Gary R
Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance
title Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance
title_full Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance
title_fullStr Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance
title_full_unstemmed Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance
title_short Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance
title_sort metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance
topic Original Research Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32386226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa086
work_keys_str_mv AT martinscatia metabolicadaptationisnotamajorbarriertoweightlossmaintenance
AT gowerbarbaraa metabolicadaptationisnotamajorbarriertoweightlossmaintenance
AT hilljameso metabolicadaptationisnotamajorbarriertoweightlossmaintenance
AT huntergaryr metabolicadaptationisnotamajorbarriertoweightlossmaintenance