Cargando…

New Horizons of Arterial Stiffness Developed Using Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI)

Arterial stiffness is recognized mainly as an indicator of arteriosclerosis and a predictor of cardiovascular events. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), which reflects arterial stiffness from the origin of the aorta to the ankle, was developed in 2004. An important feature of this index is the inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saiki, Atsuhito, Ohira, Masahiro, Yamaguchi, Takashi, Nagayama, Daiji, Shimizu, Naomi, Shirai, Kohji, Tatsuno, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595186
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.RV17043
Descripción
Sumario:Arterial stiffness is recognized mainly as an indicator of arteriosclerosis and a predictor of cardiovascular events. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), which reflects arterial stiffness from the origin of the aorta to the ankle, was developed in 2004. An important feature of this index is the independency from blood pressure at the time of measurement. A large volume of clinical evidence obtained using CAVI has been reported. CAVI is high in patients with various atherosclerotic diseases including coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease. Most coronary risk factors increase CAVI and their improvement reduces CAVI. Many prospective studies have investigated the association between CAVI and future cardiovascular disease (CVD), and proposed CAVI of 9 as the optimal cut-off value for predicting CVD. Research also shows that CAVI reflects afterload and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with heart failure. Furthermore, relatively acute changes in CAVI are observed under various pathophysiological conditions including mental stress, septic shock and congestive heart failure, and in pharmacological studies. CAVI seems to reflect not only structural stiffness but also functional stiffness involved in acute vascular functions. In 2016, Spronck and colleagues proposed a variant index CAVI(0), and claimed that CAVI(0) was truly independent of blood pressure while CAVI was not. This argument was settled, and the independence of CAVI from blood pressure was reaffirmed. In this review, we summarize the recently accumulated evidence of CAVI, focusing on the proposed cut-off values for CVD events, and suggest the development of new horizons of vascular function index using CAVI.