Cargando…

Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies

BACKGROUND: Biopharmaceutical companies are piloting patient experience surveys (PES) to help enhance patient satisfaction with clinical studies. However, most PES have been conducted at study close-out, which can hinder recall and responsiveness, and at a limited number of sites, which restricts th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manning, Elizabeth, Herndon, Mitch, Frye, Wendy, Ice, Tammy S., Thyssen, Nadia, Pushparajah, Daphnee S., Yates, Stephen L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31965539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00115-5
_version_ 1783576286819516416
author Manning, Elizabeth
Herndon, Mitch
Frye, Wendy
Ice, Tammy S.
Thyssen, Nadia
Pushparajah, Daphnee S.
Yates, Stephen L.
author_facet Manning, Elizabeth
Herndon, Mitch
Frye, Wendy
Ice, Tammy S.
Thyssen, Nadia
Pushparajah, Daphnee S.
Yates, Stephen L.
author_sort Manning, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biopharmaceutical companies are piloting patient experience surveys (PES) to help enhance patient satisfaction with clinical studies. However, most PES have been conducted at study close-out, which can hinder recall and responsiveness, and at a limited number of sites, which restricts their applicability to global studies. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of developing sequential PES, which would be deployed globally, and to provide practical recommendations based on our real-world experience. METHODS: To develop sequential PES (introductory, interim, close-out), we customized a previously developed patient experience close-out survey. Extensive input was gained from multiple stakeholders (e.g., survey experts, patient advisors, psychometricians, clinical trialists, lawyers). To deploy the PES in global studies, we prepared PES-specific ethics committee submissions, training materials (e.g., slides, videos), and PES invitation aids (postcards, digital app reminders). RESULTS: Developing and deploying sequential PES in global clinical studies was feasible. The 3-part online PES (25 to 37 questions per survey) passed health literacy testing. To facilitate benchmarking, the PES included core questions (including a Net Promoter Score question). The PES gained ethics approval and was deployed globally in 2017–2018 in 12 phase 2 and 3 clinical studies in North America, Europe, and the Asia–Pacific. Based on the real-world insights gained and the challenges encountered, we have made recommendations for PES. CONCLUSIONS: Our practical recommendations on the development and deployment of sequential global PES may assist others to implement PES efficiently and effectively, allowing them to gain feedback from patients globally during clinical studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43441-020-00115-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7458896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74588962020-09-04 Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies Manning, Elizabeth Herndon, Mitch Frye, Wendy Ice, Tammy S. Thyssen, Nadia Pushparajah, Daphnee S. Yates, Stephen L. Ther Innov Regul Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Biopharmaceutical companies are piloting patient experience surveys (PES) to help enhance patient satisfaction with clinical studies. However, most PES have been conducted at study close-out, which can hinder recall and responsiveness, and at a limited number of sites, which restricts their applicability to global studies. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of developing sequential PES, which would be deployed globally, and to provide practical recommendations based on our real-world experience. METHODS: To develop sequential PES (introductory, interim, close-out), we customized a previously developed patient experience close-out survey. Extensive input was gained from multiple stakeholders (e.g., survey experts, patient advisors, psychometricians, clinical trialists, lawyers). To deploy the PES in global studies, we prepared PES-specific ethics committee submissions, training materials (e.g., slides, videos), and PES invitation aids (postcards, digital app reminders). RESULTS: Developing and deploying sequential PES in global clinical studies was feasible. The 3-part online PES (25 to 37 questions per survey) passed health literacy testing. To facilitate benchmarking, the PES included core questions (including a Net Promoter Score question). The PES gained ethics approval and was deployed globally in 2017–2018 in 12 phase 2 and 3 clinical studies in North America, Europe, and the Asia–Pacific. Based on the real-world insights gained and the challenges encountered, we have made recommendations for PES. CONCLUSIONS: Our practical recommendations on the development and deployment of sequential global PES may assist others to implement PES efficiently and effectively, allowing them to gain feedback from patients globally during clinical studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43441-020-00115-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-01-21 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7458896/ /pubmed/31965539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00115-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Manning, Elizabeth
Herndon, Mitch
Frye, Wendy
Ice, Tammy S.
Thyssen, Nadia
Pushparajah, Daphnee S.
Yates, Stephen L.
Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies
title Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies
title_full Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies
title_fullStr Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies
title_full_unstemmed Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies
title_short Giving Voice to Clinical Study Participants: Development and Deployment of Sequential Patient Experience Surveys for Global Clinical Studies
title_sort giving voice to clinical study participants: development and deployment of sequential patient experience surveys for global clinical studies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31965539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00115-5
work_keys_str_mv AT manningelizabeth givingvoicetoclinicalstudyparticipantsdevelopmentanddeploymentofsequentialpatientexperiencesurveysforglobalclinicalstudies
AT herndonmitch givingvoicetoclinicalstudyparticipantsdevelopmentanddeploymentofsequentialpatientexperiencesurveysforglobalclinicalstudies
AT fryewendy givingvoicetoclinicalstudyparticipantsdevelopmentanddeploymentofsequentialpatientexperiencesurveysforglobalclinicalstudies
AT icetammys givingvoicetoclinicalstudyparticipantsdevelopmentanddeploymentofsequentialpatientexperiencesurveysforglobalclinicalstudies
AT thyssennadia givingvoicetoclinicalstudyparticipantsdevelopmentanddeploymentofsequentialpatientexperiencesurveysforglobalclinicalstudies
AT pushparajahdaphnees givingvoicetoclinicalstudyparticipantsdevelopmentanddeploymentofsequentialpatientexperiencesurveysforglobalclinicalstudies
AT yatesstephenl givingvoicetoclinicalstudyparticipantsdevelopmentanddeploymentofsequentialpatientexperiencesurveysforglobalclinicalstudies