Cargando…

Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study

BACKGROUND: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has become an increasingly preferred procedure for early cancer in the upper third of the stomach, owing to reportedly superior quality of life (QOL) after PG when compared with total gastrectomy. However, various methods of reconstruction have currently been pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yabusaki, Hiroshi, Kodera, Yasuhiro, Fukushima, Norimasa, Hiki, Naoki, Kinami, Shinichi, Yoshida, Masashi, Aoyagi, Keishiro, Ota, Shuichi, Hata, Hiroaki, Noro, Hiroshi, Oshio, Atsushi, Nakada, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32506229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05629-5
_version_ 1783576295690469376
author Yabusaki, Hiroshi
Kodera, Yasuhiro
Fukushima, Norimasa
Hiki, Naoki
Kinami, Shinichi
Yoshida, Masashi
Aoyagi, Keishiro
Ota, Shuichi
Hata, Hiroaki
Noro, Hiroshi
Oshio, Atsushi
Nakada, Koji
author_facet Yabusaki, Hiroshi
Kodera, Yasuhiro
Fukushima, Norimasa
Hiki, Naoki
Kinami, Shinichi
Yoshida, Masashi
Aoyagi, Keishiro
Ota, Shuichi
Hata, Hiroaki
Noro, Hiroshi
Oshio, Atsushi
Nakada, Koji
author_sort Yabusaki, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has become an increasingly preferred procedure for early cancer in the upper third of the stomach, owing to reportedly superior quality of life (QOL) after PG when compared with total gastrectomy. However, various methods of reconstruction have currently been proposed. We compared the postoperative QOL among the three different reconstruction methods after PG using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45) questionnaire. METHODS: Post Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Study (PGSAS), a nationwide multi-institutional survey, was conducted to evaluate QOL using the PGSAS-45 among various types of gastrectomy. Of the 2,368 eligible data from the PGSAS survey, data from 193 patients who underwent PG were retrieved and used in the current study. The PGSAS-45 consists of 45 items including 22 original gastrectomy specific items in addition to the SF-8 and GSRS. These were consolidated into 19 main outcome measures pertaining postgastrectomy symptoms, amount of food ingested, quality of ingestion, work, and level of satisfaction for daily work, and the three reconstruction methods (n = 193; 115 esophago-gastrostomy [PGEG], 34 jejunal interposition [PGJI], and 44 jejunal pouch interposition [PGJPI]) were compared using PGSAS-45. RESULTS: Size of the remnant stomach was significantly larger in PGEG, and significantly smaller in PGJI and PGJPI (P < 0.05). There was no difference in other patient background factors among the groups. EGJPI tended to be superior to PGEG in several of the 19 main outcome with marginal significance (P = 0.047–0.076). CONCLUSION: PGJPI appears to be the most favorable of the three reconstruction methods after PG especially when the size of remnant stomach is rather small. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN-CTR #000002116 entitled as “A study to observe correlation between resection and reconstruction procedures employed for gastric neoplasms and development of postgastrectomy syndrome”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7458934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74589342020-09-11 Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study Yabusaki, Hiroshi Kodera, Yasuhiro Fukushima, Norimasa Hiki, Naoki Kinami, Shinichi Yoshida, Masashi Aoyagi, Keishiro Ota, Shuichi Hata, Hiroaki Noro, Hiroshi Oshio, Atsushi Nakada, Koji World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has become an increasingly preferred procedure for early cancer in the upper third of the stomach, owing to reportedly superior quality of life (QOL) after PG when compared with total gastrectomy. However, various methods of reconstruction have currently been proposed. We compared the postoperative QOL among the three different reconstruction methods after PG using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45) questionnaire. METHODS: Post Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Study (PGSAS), a nationwide multi-institutional survey, was conducted to evaluate QOL using the PGSAS-45 among various types of gastrectomy. Of the 2,368 eligible data from the PGSAS survey, data from 193 patients who underwent PG were retrieved and used in the current study. The PGSAS-45 consists of 45 items including 22 original gastrectomy specific items in addition to the SF-8 and GSRS. These were consolidated into 19 main outcome measures pertaining postgastrectomy symptoms, amount of food ingested, quality of ingestion, work, and level of satisfaction for daily work, and the three reconstruction methods (n = 193; 115 esophago-gastrostomy [PGEG], 34 jejunal interposition [PGJI], and 44 jejunal pouch interposition [PGJPI]) were compared using PGSAS-45. RESULTS: Size of the remnant stomach was significantly larger in PGEG, and significantly smaller in PGJI and PGJPI (P < 0.05). There was no difference in other patient background factors among the groups. EGJPI tended to be superior to PGEG in several of the 19 main outcome with marginal significance (P = 0.047–0.076). CONCLUSION: PGJPI appears to be the most favorable of the three reconstruction methods after PG especially when the size of remnant stomach is rather small. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN-CTR #000002116 entitled as “A study to observe correlation between resection and reconstruction procedures employed for gastric neoplasms and development of postgastrectomy syndrome” Springer International Publishing 2020-06-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7458934/ /pubmed/32506229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05629-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Report
Yabusaki, Hiroshi
Kodera, Yasuhiro
Fukushima, Norimasa
Hiki, Naoki
Kinami, Shinichi
Yoshida, Masashi
Aoyagi, Keishiro
Ota, Shuichi
Hata, Hiroaki
Noro, Hiroshi
Oshio, Atsushi
Nakada, Koji
Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study
title Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study
title_full Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study
title_short Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life among Three Different Reconstruction Methods After Proximal Gastrectomy: Insights From the PGSAS Study
title_sort comparison of postoperative quality of life among three different reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy: insights from the pgsas study
topic Original Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32506229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05629-5
work_keys_str_mv AT yabusakihiroshi comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT koderayasuhiro comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT fukushimanorimasa comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT hikinaoki comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT kinamishinichi comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT yoshidamasashi comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT aoyagikeishiro comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT otashuichi comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT hatahiroaki comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT norohiroshi comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT oshioatsushi comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy
AT nakadakoji comparisonofpostoperativequalityoflifeamongthreedifferentreconstructionmethodsafterproximalgastrectomyinsightsfromthepgsasstudy