Cargando…

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks

AIM: In patients with thunderclap headaches, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) should be considered as a differential diagnosis. However, RCVS diagnosis in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging. This report describes the clinical features and factors related to RCVS di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukaguchi, Kiyomitsu, Goto, Tadahiro, Fukui, Hiroyuki, Sekine, Ichiro, Yamagami, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.559
_version_ 1783576327959347200
author Fukaguchi, Kiyomitsu
Goto, Tadahiro
Fukui, Hiroyuki
Sekine, Ichiro
Yamagami, Hiroshi
author_facet Fukaguchi, Kiyomitsu
Goto, Tadahiro
Fukui, Hiroyuki
Sekine, Ichiro
Yamagami, Hiroshi
author_sort Fukaguchi, Kiyomitsu
collection PubMed
description AIM: In patients with thunderclap headaches, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) should be considered as a differential diagnosis. However, RCVS diagnosis in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging. This report describes the clinical features and factors related to RCVS diagnosis and suggests diagnostic strategies for its management. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of eight patients diagnosed with RCVS from January 2010 to March 2019 (aged 18–69 years, 5 women). RESULTS: The median duration from the ED visit to RCVS diagnosis was 6 days (range, 1–11 days). Of the eight patients, seven were middle‐aged, six had apparent triggers, six had subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), five had high systolic blood pressure, and none had any specific abnormality observed upon physical examination. At the initial visit, RCVS was diagnosed in only one patient who had a history of RCVS. Of the other patients, SAH was diagnosed in two, and primary headache was diagnosed in four patients with negative computed tomography (CT) findings. Based on follow‐up angiography (e.g., magnetic resonance angiography), seven of eight patients with convexal SAH were diagnosed with RCVS (as the cause of SAH). CONCLUSION: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome with negative CT findings at the ED visit was likely to be misdiagnosed as a primary headache. In patients with thunderclap headache and negative CT findings, physicians should consider RCVS as a differential diagnosis, inform patients of the risk of RCVS, and undertake follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7459196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74591962020-09-03 Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks Fukaguchi, Kiyomitsu Goto, Tadahiro Fukui, Hiroyuki Sekine, Ichiro Yamagami, Hiroshi Acute Med Surg Brief Communication AIM: In patients with thunderclap headaches, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) should be considered as a differential diagnosis. However, RCVS diagnosis in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging. This report describes the clinical features and factors related to RCVS diagnosis and suggests diagnostic strategies for its management. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of eight patients diagnosed with RCVS from January 2010 to March 2019 (aged 18–69 years, 5 women). RESULTS: The median duration from the ED visit to RCVS diagnosis was 6 days (range, 1–11 days). Of the eight patients, seven were middle‐aged, six had apparent triggers, six had subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), five had high systolic blood pressure, and none had any specific abnormality observed upon physical examination. At the initial visit, RCVS was diagnosed in only one patient who had a history of RCVS. Of the other patients, SAH was diagnosed in two, and primary headache was diagnosed in four patients with negative computed tomography (CT) findings. Based on follow‐up angiography (e.g., magnetic resonance angiography), seven of eight patients with convexal SAH were diagnosed with RCVS (as the cause of SAH). CONCLUSION: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome with negative CT findings at the ED visit was likely to be misdiagnosed as a primary headache. In patients with thunderclap headache and negative CT findings, physicians should consider RCVS as a differential diagnosis, inform patients of the risk of RCVS, and undertake follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7459196/ /pubmed/32904795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.559 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acute Medicine & Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Fukaguchi, Kiyomitsu
Goto, Tadahiro
Fukui, Hiroyuki
Sekine, Ichiro
Yamagami, Hiroshi
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks
title Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks
title_full Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks
title_fullStr Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks
title_full_unstemmed Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks
title_short Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks
title_sort reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow‐up imaging within 2 weeks
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.559
work_keys_str_mv AT fukaguchikiyomitsu reversiblecerebralvasoconstrictionsyndrometheimportanceoffollowupimagingwithin2weeks
AT gototadahiro reversiblecerebralvasoconstrictionsyndrometheimportanceoffollowupimagingwithin2weeks
AT fukuihiroyuki reversiblecerebralvasoconstrictionsyndrometheimportanceoffollowupimagingwithin2weeks
AT sekineichiro reversiblecerebralvasoconstrictionsyndrometheimportanceoffollowupimagingwithin2weeks
AT yamagamihiroshi reversiblecerebralvasoconstrictionsyndrometheimportanceoffollowupimagingwithin2weeks