Cargando…
Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review
The proximal femur is the long bone most commonly affected by metastatic disease. There are many treatment options, such as hip megaprostheses. A topic still widely debated in literature is the use of cemented or uncemented megaprostheses in this kind of patients. The purpose of this review is to ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913616 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8689 |
_version_ | 1783576359573913600 |
---|---|
author | Oliva, Maria Serena Vitiello, Raffaele Cauteruccio, Michele Pesare, Elisa Rovere, Giuseppe Meschini, Cesare Liuzza, Francesco Maccauro, Giulio Ziranu, Antonio |
author_facet | Oliva, Maria Serena Vitiello, Raffaele Cauteruccio, Michele Pesare, Elisa Rovere, Giuseppe Meschini, Cesare Liuzza, Francesco Maccauro, Giulio Ziranu, Antonio |
author_sort | Oliva, Maria Serena |
collection | PubMed |
description | The proximal femur is the long bone most commonly affected by metastatic disease. There are many treatment options, such as hip megaprostheses. A topic still widely debated in literature is the use of cemented or uncemented megaprostheses in this kind of patients. The purpose of this review is to examine both these surgical options to understand which of them should be preferred in metastatic patients. Twelve articles were finally included in the review. Eight authors used cemented mega - prostheses, two cementless megaprostheses and two authors used both techniques. Better functional outcomes and lower infection rates were found in cementless mega - prostheses. More studies have to be performed to choose the better technique and improve patients’ quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7459367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74593672020-09-09 Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review Oliva, Maria Serena Vitiello, Raffaele Cauteruccio, Michele Pesare, Elisa Rovere, Giuseppe Meschini, Cesare Liuzza, Francesco Maccauro, Giulio Ziranu, Antonio Orthop Rev (Pavia) Review The proximal femur is the long bone most commonly affected by metastatic disease. There are many treatment options, such as hip megaprostheses. A topic still widely debated in literature is the use of cemented or uncemented megaprostheses in this kind of patients. The purpose of this review is to examine both these surgical options to understand which of them should be preferred in metastatic patients. Twelve articles were finally included in the review. Eight authors used cemented mega - prostheses, two cementless megaprostheses and two authors used both techniques. Better functional outcomes and lower infection rates were found in cementless mega - prostheses. More studies have to be performed to choose the better technique and improve patients’ quality of life. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7459367/ /pubmed/32913616 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8689 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Review Oliva, Maria Serena Vitiello, Raffaele Cauteruccio, Michele Pesare, Elisa Rovere, Giuseppe Meschini, Cesare Liuzza, Francesco Maccauro, Giulio Ziranu, Antonio Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review |
title | Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review |
title_full | Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review |
title_short | Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review |
title_sort | cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913616 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8689 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olivamariaserena cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview AT vitielloraffaele cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview AT cauterucciomichele cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview AT pesareelisa cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview AT roveregiuseppe cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview AT meschinicesare cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview AT liuzzafrancesco cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview AT maccaurogiulio cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview AT ziranuantonio cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview |