Cargando…

Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review

The proximal femur is the long bone most commonly affected by metastatic disease. There are many treatment options, such as hip megaprostheses. A topic still widely debated in literature is the use of cemented or uncemented megaprostheses in this kind of patients. The purpose of this review is to ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliva, Maria Serena, Vitiello, Raffaele, Cauteruccio, Michele, Pesare, Elisa, Rovere, Giuseppe, Meschini, Cesare, Liuzza, Francesco, Maccauro, Giulio, Ziranu, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913616
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8689
_version_ 1783576359573913600
author Oliva, Maria Serena
Vitiello, Raffaele
Cauteruccio, Michele
Pesare, Elisa
Rovere, Giuseppe
Meschini, Cesare
Liuzza, Francesco
Maccauro, Giulio
Ziranu, Antonio
author_facet Oliva, Maria Serena
Vitiello, Raffaele
Cauteruccio, Michele
Pesare, Elisa
Rovere, Giuseppe
Meschini, Cesare
Liuzza, Francesco
Maccauro, Giulio
Ziranu, Antonio
author_sort Oliva, Maria Serena
collection PubMed
description The proximal femur is the long bone most commonly affected by metastatic disease. There are many treatment options, such as hip megaprostheses. A topic still widely debated in literature is the use of cemented or uncemented megaprostheses in this kind of patients. The purpose of this review is to examine both these surgical options to understand which of them should be preferred in metastatic patients. Twelve articles were finally included in the review. Eight authors used cemented mega - prostheses, two cementless megaprostheses and two authors used both techniques. Better functional outcomes and lower infection rates were found in cementless mega - prostheses. More studies have to be performed to choose the better technique and improve patients’ quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7459367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74593672020-09-09 Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review Oliva, Maria Serena Vitiello, Raffaele Cauteruccio, Michele Pesare, Elisa Rovere, Giuseppe Meschini, Cesare Liuzza, Francesco Maccauro, Giulio Ziranu, Antonio Orthop Rev (Pavia) Review The proximal femur is the long bone most commonly affected by metastatic disease. There are many treatment options, such as hip megaprostheses. A topic still widely debated in literature is the use of cemented or uncemented megaprostheses in this kind of patients. The purpose of this review is to examine both these surgical options to understand which of them should be preferred in metastatic patients. Twelve articles were finally included in the review. Eight authors used cemented mega - prostheses, two cementless megaprostheses and two authors used both techniques. Better functional outcomes and lower infection rates were found in cementless mega - prostheses. More studies have to be performed to choose the better technique and improve patients’ quality of life. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7459367/ /pubmed/32913616 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8689 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Review
Oliva, Maria Serena
Vitiello, Raffaele
Cauteruccio, Michele
Pesare, Elisa
Rovere, Giuseppe
Meschini, Cesare
Liuzza, Francesco
Maccauro, Giulio
Ziranu, Antonio
Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review
title Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review
title_full Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review
title_fullStr Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review
title_short Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review
title_sort cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913616
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8689
work_keys_str_mv AT olivamariaserena cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT vitielloraffaele cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT cauterucciomichele cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT pesareelisa cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT roveregiuseppe cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT meschinicesare cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT liuzzafrancesco cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT maccaurogiulio cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview
AT ziranuantonio cementedversuscementlessmegaprosthesisinproximalfemurmetastaticdiseaseasystematicreview