Cargando…

Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty

Revision total hip arthroplasty in the setting of acetabular bone loss is a challenging procedure and requires a solid understanding of current acetabular reconstruction options. Despite major developments in the field of revision hip surgery in recent decades, reconstruction of acetabular defects r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mancino, Fabio, Cacciola, Giorgio, Di Matteo, Vincenzo, De Marco, Davide, Greenberg, Alexander, Perisano, Carlo, MA, Malahias, Sculco, Peter K., Maccauro, Giulio, De Martino, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913591
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8655
_version_ 1783576359798308864
author Mancino, Fabio
Cacciola, Giorgio
Di Matteo, Vincenzo
De Marco, Davide
Greenberg, Alexander
Perisano, Carlo
MA, Malahias
Sculco, Peter K.
Maccauro, Giulio
De Martino, Ivan
author_facet Mancino, Fabio
Cacciola, Giorgio
Di Matteo, Vincenzo
De Marco, Davide
Greenberg, Alexander
Perisano, Carlo
MA, Malahias
Sculco, Peter K.
Maccauro, Giulio
De Martino, Ivan
author_sort Mancino, Fabio
collection PubMed
description Revision total hip arthroplasty in the setting of acetabular bone loss is a challenging procedure and requires a solid understanding of current acetabular reconstruction options. Despite major developments in the field of revision hip surgery in recent decades, reconstruction of acetabular defects remains a major problem in order to achieve primary stability and durable fixation without sacrificing additional bone stock. Although there are several ways to classify acetabular bone defects, the Paprosky classification system is the most commonly used to describe the defects and guide treatment strategy. An understanding of the bone defects associated with detailed pre-operative assessment and planning are essential elements in order to achieve satisfactory outcomes. Multiple acetabular reconstructive options are currently available including impaction bone grafting with metal mesh, reinforcement rings and antiprotrusio cage, structural allografts, cementless hemispherical cups, extra-large “jumbo cups”, oblong cups, modular porous metal augments, cup-cage constructs, custom- made triflange cups, and acetabular distraction. To date, debate continues as to which technique is most effective due to the lack of long-term studies of modern reconstruction systems. Further long-term studies are necessary to assess the longevity of the different implants. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature and provide a comprehensive understanding of the available reconstruction options with their clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7459368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74593682020-09-09 Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty Mancino, Fabio Cacciola, Giorgio Di Matteo, Vincenzo De Marco, Davide Greenberg, Alexander Perisano, Carlo MA, Malahias Sculco, Peter K. Maccauro, Giulio De Martino, Ivan Orthop Rev (Pavia) Review Revision total hip arthroplasty in the setting of acetabular bone loss is a challenging procedure and requires a solid understanding of current acetabular reconstruction options. Despite major developments in the field of revision hip surgery in recent decades, reconstruction of acetabular defects remains a major problem in order to achieve primary stability and durable fixation without sacrificing additional bone stock. Although there are several ways to classify acetabular bone defects, the Paprosky classification system is the most commonly used to describe the defects and guide treatment strategy. An understanding of the bone defects associated with detailed pre-operative assessment and planning are essential elements in order to achieve satisfactory outcomes. Multiple acetabular reconstructive options are currently available including impaction bone grafting with metal mesh, reinforcement rings and antiprotrusio cage, structural allografts, cementless hemispherical cups, extra-large “jumbo cups”, oblong cups, modular porous metal augments, cup-cage constructs, custom- made triflange cups, and acetabular distraction. To date, debate continues as to which technique is most effective due to the lack of long-term studies of modern reconstruction systems. Further long-term studies are necessary to assess the longevity of the different implants. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature and provide a comprehensive understanding of the available reconstruction options with their clinical outcomes. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7459368/ /pubmed/32913591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8655 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Review
Mancino, Fabio
Cacciola, Giorgio
Di Matteo, Vincenzo
De Marco, Davide
Greenberg, Alexander
Perisano, Carlo
MA, Malahias
Sculco, Peter K.
Maccauro, Giulio
De Martino, Ivan
Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
title Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
title_full Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
title_short Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
title_sort reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913591
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8655
work_keys_str_mv AT mancinofabio reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT cacciolagiorgio reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT dimatteovincenzo reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT demarcodavide reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT greenbergalexander reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT perisanocarlo reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT mamalahias reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT sculcopeterk reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT maccaurogiulio reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty
AT demartinoivan reconstructionoptionsandoutcomesforacetabularbonelossinrevisionhiparthroplasty