Cargando…
Development and Evaluation of an HIV-Testing Intervention for Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
BACKGROUND: Late diagnosis of HIV fosters HIV transmission and may lead to hidden HIV epidemics. In Belgium, mathematical modeling indicates a high prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infections among men who have sex with men of non-Belgian origin and among sub-Saharan African migrants. Promotion of HIV...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32497016 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16486 |
_version_ | 1783576373104738304 |
---|---|
author | Apers, Hanne Vuylsteke, Bea Loos, Jasna Smekens, Tom Deblonde, Jessika Van Beckhoven, Dominique Nöstlinger, Christiana |
author_facet | Apers, Hanne Vuylsteke, Bea Loos, Jasna Smekens, Tom Deblonde, Jessika Van Beckhoven, Dominique Nöstlinger, Christiana |
author_sort | Apers, Hanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Late diagnosis of HIV fosters HIV transmission and may lead to hidden HIV epidemics. In Belgium, mathematical modeling indicates a high prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infections among men who have sex with men of non-Belgian origin and among sub-Saharan African migrants. Promotion of HIV testing facilitates early diagnosis, but diagnostic opportunities are missed in primary care. OBJECTIVE: The intervention study aims to enhance provider-initiated HIV testing by GPs. This protocol presents the conceptual development, implementation, and evaluation of an HIV-testing intervention for Flemish general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: A mixed methods evaluation design is used. Guided by a simplified intervention mapping approach, an evidence-based intervention was developed in collaboration, guided by an interdisciplinary advisory board. The intervention consisted of an evidence-based tool (ie, “HIV-testing advice for primary care”) to support GPs in provider-initiated HIV testing. A modified stepped-wedge design compare two different intervention levels: (1) online dissemination of the HIV-testing advice and (2) dissemination with additional group-level training. Both conditions were compared against a control condition with no intervention. The effect of the intervention was measured using Poisson regression for national surveillance data. The primary outcome was the number of HIV diagnoses made by GPs. Secondary outcomes were HIV diagnoses among groups at risk for undiagnosed HIV, distribution of new diagnoses by CD4 cell count, number of HIV tests prescribed by GPs, and rate of new diagnoses by tests. To evaluate the intervention’s implementation, the GPs’ fidelity to the intervention and the intervention’s feasibility and acceptability by GPs were assessed through (web-based) surveys and in-depth telephone interviews. RESULTS: The study was funded in 2016 and ethically approved in January 2017. The implementation of the intervention started in January 2017 and ended in December 2018. Data was completed in October 2019 and was the starting point for the ongoing data analysis. The results are expected to be published in the second half of 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the intervention study will provide useful information on the intervention’s effectiveness among Flemish GPs and can inform further development of official testing guidelines. Limitations of this real-life intervention approach are potential spill-over effects, delay in access to surveillance data, and little detailed information on HIV-testing practices among GPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04056156; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04056156 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/16486 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7459432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74594322020-09-03 Development and Evaluation of an HIV-Testing Intervention for Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study Apers, Hanne Vuylsteke, Bea Loos, Jasna Smekens, Tom Deblonde, Jessika Van Beckhoven, Dominique Nöstlinger, Christiana JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Late diagnosis of HIV fosters HIV transmission and may lead to hidden HIV epidemics. In Belgium, mathematical modeling indicates a high prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infections among men who have sex with men of non-Belgian origin and among sub-Saharan African migrants. Promotion of HIV testing facilitates early diagnosis, but diagnostic opportunities are missed in primary care. OBJECTIVE: The intervention study aims to enhance provider-initiated HIV testing by GPs. This protocol presents the conceptual development, implementation, and evaluation of an HIV-testing intervention for Flemish general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: A mixed methods evaluation design is used. Guided by a simplified intervention mapping approach, an evidence-based intervention was developed in collaboration, guided by an interdisciplinary advisory board. The intervention consisted of an evidence-based tool (ie, “HIV-testing advice for primary care”) to support GPs in provider-initiated HIV testing. A modified stepped-wedge design compare two different intervention levels: (1) online dissemination of the HIV-testing advice and (2) dissemination with additional group-level training. Both conditions were compared against a control condition with no intervention. The effect of the intervention was measured using Poisson regression for national surveillance data. The primary outcome was the number of HIV diagnoses made by GPs. Secondary outcomes were HIV diagnoses among groups at risk for undiagnosed HIV, distribution of new diagnoses by CD4 cell count, number of HIV tests prescribed by GPs, and rate of new diagnoses by tests. To evaluate the intervention’s implementation, the GPs’ fidelity to the intervention and the intervention’s feasibility and acceptability by GPs were assessed through (web-based) surveys and in-depth telephone interviews. RESULTS: The study was funded in 2016 and ethically approved in January 2017. The implementation of the intervention started in January 2017 and ended in December 2018. Data was completed in October 2019 and was the starting point for the ongoing data analysis. The results are expected to be published in the second half of 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the intervention study will provide useful information on the intervention’s effectiveness among Flemish GPs and can inform further development of official testing guidelines. Limitations of this real-life intervention approach are potential spill-over effects, delay in access to surveillance data, and little detailed information on HIV-testing practices among GPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04056156; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04056156 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/16486 JMIR Publications 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7459432/ /pubmed/32497016 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16486 Text en ©Hanne Apers, Bea Vuylsteke, Jasna Loos, Tom Smekens, Jessika Deblonde, Dominique Van Beckhoven, Christiana Nöstlinger. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 17.08.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Apers, Hanne Vuylsteke, Bea Loos, Jasna Smekens, Tom Deblonde, Jessika Van Beckhoven, Dominique Nöstlinger, Christiana Development and Evaluation of an HIV-Testing Intervention for Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study |
title | Development and Evaluation of an HIV-Testing Intervention for Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study |
title_full | Development and Evaluation of an HIV-Testing Intervention for Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study |
title_fullStr | Development and Evaluation of an HIV-Testing Intervention for Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Evaluation of an HIV-Testing Intervention for Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study |
title_short | Development and Evaluation of an HIV-Testing Intervention for Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study |
title_sort | development and evaluation of an hiv-testing intervention for primary care: protocol for a mixed methods study |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32497016 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16486 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT apershanne developmentandevaluationofanhivtestinginterventionforprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT vuylstekebea developmentandevaluationofanhivtestinginterventionforprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT loosjasna developmentandevaluationofanhivtestinginterventionforprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT smekenstom developmentandevaluationofanhivtestinginterventionforprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT deblondejessika developmentandevaluationofanhivtestinginterventionforprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT vanbeckhovendominique developmentandevaluationofanhivtestinginterventionforprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy AT nostlingerchristiana developmentandevaluationofanhivtestinginterventionforprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy |