Cargando…

Tensions and Paradoxes of Stigma: Discussing Stigma in Mental Health Rehabilitation

Mental illness remains as one of the most stigmatizing conditions in contemporary western societies. This study sheds light on how mental health professionals and rehabilitants perceive stigmatization. The qualitative study is based on stimulated focus group interviews conducted in five Finnish ment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paananen, Jenny, Lindholm, Camilla, Stevanovic, Melisa, Weiste, Elina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165943
_version_ 1783576375706255360
author Paananen, Jenny
Lindholm, Camilla
Stevanovic, Melisa
Weiste, Elina
author_facet Paananen, Jenny
Lindholm, Camilla
Stevanovic, Melisa
Weiste, Elina
author_sort Paananen, Jenny
collection PubMed
description Mental illness remains as one of the most stigmatizing conditions in contemporary western societies. This study sheds light on how mental health professionals and rehabilitants perceive stigmatization. The qualitative study is based on stimulated focus group interviews conducted in five Finnish mental health rehabilitation centers that follow the Clubhouse model. The findings were analyzed through inductive content analysis. Both the mental health rehabilitants and the professionals perceived stigmatization as a phenomenon that concerns the majority of rehabilitants. However, whereas the professionals viewed stigma as something that is inflicted upon the mentally ill from the outside, the rehabilitants perceived stigma as something that the mentally ill themselves can influence by advancing their own confidence, shame management, and recovery. Improvements in treatment, along with media coverage, were seen as the factors that reduce stigmatization, but the same conceptualization did not hold for serious mental illnesses. As the average Clubhouse client was thought to be a person with serious mental illness, the rehabilitation context designed to normalize attitudes toward mental health problems was paradoxically perceived to enforce the concept of inevitable stigma. Therefore, it is important for professionals in rehabilitation communities to be reflexively aware of these tensions when supporting the rehabilitants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7459444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74594442020-09-02 Tensions and Paradoxes of Stigma: Discussing Stigma in Mental Health Rehabilitation Paananen, Jenny Lindholm, Camilla Stevanovic, Melisa Weiste, Elina Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Mental illness remains as one of the most stigmatizing conditions in contemporary western societies. This study sheds light on how mental health professionals and rehabilitants perceive stigmatization. The qualitative study is based on stimulated focus group interviews conducted in five Finnish mental health rehabilitation centers that follow the Clubhouse model. The findings were analyzed through inductive content analysis. Both the mental health rehabilitants and the professionals perceived stigmatization as a phenomenon that concerns the majority of rehabilitants. However, whereas the professionals viewed stigma as something that is inflicted upon the mentally ill from the outside, the rehabilitants perceived stigma as something that the mentally ill themselves can influence by advancing their own confidence, shame management, and recovery. Improvements in treatment, along with media coverage, were seen as the factors that reduce stigmatization, but the same conceptualization did not hold for serious mental illnesses. As the average Clubhouse client was thought to be a person with serious mental illness, the rehabilitation context designed to normalize attitudes toward mental health problems was paradoxically perceived to enforce the concept of inevitable stigma. Therefore, it is important for professionals in rehabilitation communities to be reflexively aware of these tensions when supporting the rehabilitants. MDPI 2020-08-16 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7459444/ /pubmed/32824309 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165943 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paananen, Jenny
Lindholm, Camilla
Stevanovic, Melisa
Weiste, Elina
Tensions and Paradoxes of Stigma: Discussing Stigma in Mental Health Rehabilitation
title Tensions and Paradoxes of Stigma: Discussing Stigma in Mental Health Rehabilitation
title_full Tensions and Paradoxes of Stigma: Discussing Stigma in Mental Health Rehabilitation
title_fullStr Tensions and Paradoxes of Stigma: Discussing Stigma in Mental Health Rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Tensions and Paradoxes of Stigma: Discussing Stigma in Mental Health Rehabilitation
title_short Tensions and Paradoxes of Stigma: Discussing Stigma in Mental Health Rehabilitation
title_sort tensions and paradoxes of stigma: discussing stigma in mental health rehabilitation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824309
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165943
work_keys_str_mv AT paananenjenny tensionsandparadoxesofstigmadiscussingstigmainmentalhealthrehabilitation
AT lindholmcamilla tensionsandparadoxesofstigmadiscussingstigmainmentalhealthrehabilitation
AT stevanovicmelisa tensionsandparadoxesofstigmadiscussingstigmainmentalhealthrehabilitation
AT weisteelina tensionsandparadoxesofstigmadiscussingstigmainmentalhealthrehabilitation