Cargando…
Comparison of Coxiella burnetii Excretion between Sheep and Goats Naturally Infected with One Cattle-Associated Genotype
The main reservoir of Coxiella (C.) burnetii are ruminants. They shed the pathogen through birth products, vaginal mucus, faeces and milk. A direct comparison of C. burnetii excretions between naturally infected sheep and goats was performed on the same farm to investigate species-specific differenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32823701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080652 |
_version_ | 1783576383888293888 |
---|---|
author | Bauer, Benjamin Prüfer, Louise Walter, Mathias Ganter, Isabel Frangoulidis, Dimitrios Runge, Martin Ganter, Martin |
author_facet | Bauer, Benjamin Prüfer, Louise Walter, Mathias Ganter, Isabel Frangoulidis, Dimitrios Runge, Martin Ganter, Martin |
author_sort | Bauer, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The main reservoir of Coxiella (C.) burnetii are ruminants. They shed the pathogen through birth products, vaginal mucus, faeces and milk. A direct comparison of C. burnetii excretions between naturally infected sheep and goats was performed on the same farm to investigate species-specific differences. The animals were vaccinated with an inactivated C. burnetii phase I vaccine at the beginning of the study period for public health reasons. Vaginal and rectal swabs along with milk specimens were taken monthly during the lambing period and once again at the next lambing season. To estimate the environmental contamination of the animals’ housings, nasal swabs from every animal were taken simultaneously. Moreover, dust samples from the windowsills and straw beddings were collected. All samples were examined by qPCR targeting the IS1111 gene and the MLVA/VNTR typing method was performed. Whole genome sequencing was applied to determine the number of IS1111 copies followed by a calculation of C. burnetii genome equivalents of each sample. The cattle-associated genotype C7 was detected containing 29 IS1111 copies. Overall, goats seem to shed more C. burnetii through vaginal mucus and in particular shed more and for longer via the rectal route than sheep. This is supported by the larger quantities of C. burnetii DNA detected in caprine nasal swabs and environmental samples compared to the ovine ones. Transmission of C. burnetii from cattle to small ruminants must also be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7459479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74594792020-09-02 Comparison of Coxiella burnetii Excretion between Sheep and Goats Naturally Infected with One Cattle-Associated Genotype Bauer, Benjamin Prüfer, Louise Walter, Mathias Ganter, Isabel Frangoulidis, Dimitrios Runge, Martin Ganter, Martin Pathogens Article The main reservoir of Coxiella (C.) burnetii are ruminants. They shed the pathogen through birth products, vaginal mucus, faeces and milk. A direct comparison of C. burnetii excretions between naturally infected sheep and goats was performed on the same farm to investigate species-specific differences. The animals were vaccinated with an inactivated C. burnetii phase I vaccine at the beginning of the study period for public health reasons. Vaginal and rectal swabs along with milk specimens were taken monthly during the lambing period and once again at the next lambing season. To estimate the environmental contamination of the animals’ housings, nasal swabs from every animal were taken simultaneously. Moreover, dust samples from the windowsills and straw beddings were collected. All samples were examined by qPCR targeting the IS1111 gene and the MLVA/VNTR typing method was performed. Whole genome sequencing was applied to determine the number of IS1111 copies followed by a calculation of C. burnetii genome equivalents of each sample. The cattle-associated genotype C7 was detected containing 29 IS1111 copies. Overall, goats seem to shed more C. burnetii through vaginal mucus and in particular shed more and for longer via the rectal route than sheep. This is supported by the larger quantities of C. burnetii DNA detected in caprine nasal swabs and environmental samples compared to the ovine ones. Transmission of C. burnetii from cattle to small ruminants must also be considered. MDPI 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7459479/ /pubmed/32823701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080652 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bauer, Benjamin Prüfer, Louise Walter, Mathias Ganter, Isabel Frangoulidis, Dimitrios Runge, Martin Ganter, Martin Comparison of Coxiella burnetii Excretion between Sheep and Goats Naturally Infected with One Cattle-Associated Genotype |
title | Comparison of Coxiella burnetii Excretion between Sheep and Goats Naturally Infected with One Cattle-Associated Genotype |
title_full | Comparison of Coxiella burnetii Excretion between Sheep and Goats Naturally Infected with One Cattle-Associated Genotype |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Coxiella burnetii Excretion between Sheep and Goats Naturally Infected with One Cattle-Associated Genotype |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Coxiella burnetii Excretion between Sheep and Goats Naturally Infected with One Cattle-Associated Genotype |
title_short | Comparison of Coxiella burnetii Excretion between Sheep and Goats Naturally Infected with One Cattle-Associated Genotype |
title_sort | comparison of coxiella burnetii excretion between sheep and goats naturally infected with one cattle-associated genotype |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32823701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bauerbenjamin comparisonofcoxiellaburnetiiexcretionbetweensheepandgoatsnaturallyinfectedwithonecattleassociatedgenotype AT pruferlouise comparisonofcoxiellaburnetiiexcretionbetweensheepandgoatsnaturallyinfectedwithonecattleassociatedgenotype AT waltermathias comparisonofcoxiellaburnetiiexcretionbetweensheepandgoatsnaturallyinfectedwithonecattleassociatedgenotype AT ganterisabel comparisonofcoxiellaburnetiiexcretionbetweensheepandgoatsnaturallyinfectedwithonecattleassociatedgenotype AT frangoulidisdimitrios comparisonofcoxiellaburnetiiexcretionbetweensheepandgoatsnaturallyinfectedwithonecattleassociatedgenotype AT rungemartin comparisonofcoxiellaburnetiiexcretionbetweensheepandgoatsnaturallyinfectedwithonecattleassociatedgenotype AT gantermartin comparisonofcoxiellaburnetiiexcretionbetweensheepandgoatsnaturallyinfectedwithonecattleassociatedgenotype |