Cargando…
A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women
Infidelity and romantic jealousy (RJ) are commonly cited relational level drivers of intimate partner violence (IPV) but remain undertheorized and underutilized in IPV research and prevention. This global systematic review aims to characterize the existing research on real or suspected infidelity an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781565 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682 |
_version_ | 1783576429911343104 |
---|---|
author | Pichon, Marjorie Treves-Kagan, Sarah Stern, Erin Kyegombe, Nambusi Stöckl, Heidi Buller, Ana Maria |
author_facet | Pichon, Marjorie Treves-Kagan, Sarah Stern, Erin Kyegombe, Nambusi Stöckl, Heidi Buller, Ana Maria |
author_sort | Pichon, Marjorie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infidelity and romantic jealousy (RJ) are commonly cited relational level drivers of intimate partner violence (IPV) but remain undertheorized and underutilized in IPV research and prevention. This global systematic review aims to characterize the existing research on real or suspected infidelity and RJ in relation to IPV and inform future research and programming. We systematically searched 11 databases for peer-reviewed research, published between April 2009 and 2019, that provided data on the prevalence or a measure of association (quantitative), or pathway (qualitative), between real or suspected infidelity or RJ, and IPV. Fifty-one papers from 28 countries were included and the evidence showed a consistent association between real or suspected infidelity, RJ and IPV. Our findings identify three overarching mechanisms and six pathways between infidelity, RJ and IPV. These provide support for prominent theories in the field related to patriarchal culture, threatened masculinities and femininities and a lack of emotional regulation and conflict resolution skills, but not evolutionary theories. Our findings suggest that researchers should use standardized measurement tools that make the distinction between RJ and suspected, confirmed and accusations of infidelity. Policy and programming should aim to transform traditional gender roles, accounting for infidelity and RJ and improving couple’s communication and trust. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7459695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74596952020-09-02 A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women Pichon, Marjorie Treves-Kagan, Sarah Stern, Erin Kyegombe, Nambusi Stöckl, Heidi Buller, Ana Maria Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Infidelity and romantic jealousy (RJ) are commonly cited relational level drivers of intimate partner violence (IPV) but remain undertheorized and underutilized in IPV research and prevention. This global systematic review aims to characterize the existing research on real or suspected infidelity and RJ in relation to IPV and inform future research and programming. We systematically searched 11 databases for peer-reviewed research, published between April 2009 and 2019, that provided data on the prevalence or a measure of association (quantitative), or pathway (qualitative), between real or suspected infidelity or RJ, and IPV. Fifty-one papers from 28 countries were included and the evidence showed a consistent association between real or suspected infidelity, RJ and IPV. Our findings identify three overarching mechanisms and six pathways between infidelity, RJ and IPV. These provide support for prominent theories in the field related to patriarchal culture, threatened masculinities and femininities and a lack of emotional regulation and conflict resolution skills, but not evolutionary theories. Our findings suggest that researchers should use standardized measurement tools that make the distinction between RJ and suspected, confirmed and accusations of infidelity. Policy and programming should aim to transform traditional gender roles, accounting for infidelity and RJ and improving couple’s communication and trust. MDPI 2020-08-06 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7459695/ /pubmed/32781565 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Pichon, Marjorie Treves-Kagan, Sarah Stern, Erin Kyegombe, Nambusi Stöckl, Heidi Buller, Ana Maria A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women |
title | A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women |
title_full | A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women |
title_fullStr | A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women |
title_full_unstemmed | A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women |
title_short | A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women |
title_sort | mixed-methods systematic review: infidelity, romantic jealousy and intimate partner violence against women |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781565 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pichonmarjorie amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT treveskagansarah amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT sternerin amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT kyegombenambusi amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT stocklheidi amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT bulleranamaria amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT pichonmarjorie mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT treveskagansarah mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT sternerin mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT kyegombenambusi mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT stocklheidi mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen AT bulleranamaria mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen |