Cargando…

A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women

Infidelity and romantic jealousy (RJ) are commonly cited relational level drivers of intimate partner violence (IPV) but remain undertheorized and underutilized in IPV research and prevention. This global systematic review aims to characterize the existing research on real or suspected infidelity an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pichon, Marjorie, Treves-Kagan, Sarah, Stern, Erin, Kyegombe, Nambusi, Stöckl, Heidi, Buller, Ana Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781565
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682
_version_ 1783576429911343104
author Pichon, Marjorie
Treves-Kagan, Sarah
Stern, Erin
Kyegombe, Nambusi
Stöckl, Heidi
Buller, Ana Maria
author_facet Pichon, Marjorie
Treves-Kagan, Sarah
Stern, Erin
Kyegombe, Nambusi
Stöckl, Heidi
Buller, Ana Maria
author_sort Pichon, Marjorie
collection PubMed
description Infidelity and romantic jealousy (RJ) are commonly cited relational level drivers of intimate partner violence (IPV) but remain undertheorized and underutilized in IPV research and prevention. This global systematic review aims to characterize the existing research on real or suspected infidelity and RJ in relation to IPV and inform future research and programming. We systematically searched 11 databases for peer-reviewed research, published between April 2009 and 2019, that provided data on the prevalence or a measure of association (quantitative), or pathway (qualitative), between real or suspected infidelity or RJ, and IPV. Fifty-one papers from 28 countries were included and the evidence showed a consistent association between real or suspected infidelity, RJ and IPV. Our findings identify three overarching mechanisms and six pathways between infidelity, RJ and IPV. These provide support for prominent theories in the field related to patriarchal culture, threatened masculinities and femininities and a lack of emotional regulation and conflict resolution skills, but not evolutionary theories. Our findings suggest that researchers should use standardized measurement tools that make the distinction between RJ and suspected, confirmed and accusations of infidelity. Policy and programming should aim to transform traditional gender roles, accounting for infidelity and RJ and improving couple’s communication and trust.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7459695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74596952020-09-02 A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women Pichon, Marjorie Treves-Kagan, Sarah Stern, Erin Kyegombe, Nambusi Stöckl, Heidi Buller, Ana Maria Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Infidelity and romantic jealousy (RJ) are commonly cited relational level drivers of intimate partner violence (IPV) but remain undertheorized and underutilized in IPV research and prevention. This global systematic review aims to characterize the existing research on real or suspected infidelity and RJ in relation to IPV and inform future research and programming. We systematically searched 11 databases for peer-reviewed research, published between April 2009 and 2019, that provided data on the prevalence or a measure of association (quantitative), or pathway (qualitative), between real or suspected infidelity or RJ, and IPV. Fifty-one papers from 28 countries were included and the evidence showed a consistent association between real or suspected infidelity, RJ and IPV. Our findings identify three overarching mechanisms and six pathways between infidelity, RJ and IPV. These provide support for prominent theories in the field related to patriarchal culture, threatened masculinities and femininities and a lack of emotional regulation and conflict resolution skills, but not evolutionary theories. Our findings suggest that researchers should use standardized measurement tools that make the distinction between RJ and suspected, confirmed and accusations of infidelity. Policy and programming should aim to transform traditional gender roles, accounting for infidelity and RJ and improving couple’s communication and trust. MDPI 2020-08-06 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7459695/ /pubmed/32781565 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pichon, Marjorie
Treves-Kagan, Sarah
Stern, Erin
Kyegombe, Nambusi
Stöckl, Heidi
Buller, Ana Maria
A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women
title A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women
title_full A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women
title_fullStr A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women
title_full_unstemmed A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women
title_short A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women
title_sort mixed-methods systematic review: infidelity, romantic jealousy and intimate partner violence against women
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781565
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682
work_keys_str_mv AT pichonmarjorie amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT treveskagansarah amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT sternerin amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT kyegombenambusi amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT stocklheidi amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT bulleranamaria amixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT pichonmarjorie mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT treveskagansarah mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT sternerin mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT kyegombenambusi mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT stocklheidi mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen
AT bulleranamaria mixedmethodssystematicreviewinfidelityromanticjealousyandintimatepartnerviolenceagainstwomen