Cargando…

Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study

Background: Cohort studies gather huge volumes of information about a range of phenotypes but new sources of information such as social media data are yet to be integrated. Participant’s long-term engagement with cohort studies, as well as the potential for their social media data to be linked to ot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Cara, Nina H., Boyd, Andy, Tanner, Alastair R., Al Baghal, Tarek, Calderwood, Lisa, Sloan, Luke S., Davis, Oliver S. P., Haworth, Claire M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904854
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15755.2
_version_ 1783576465457020928
author Di Cara, Nina H.
Boyd, Andy
Tanner, Alastair R.
Al Baghal, Tarek
Calderwood, Lisa
Sloan, Luke S.
Davis, Oliver S. P.
Haworth, Claire M. A.
author_facet Di Cara, Nina H.
Boyd, Andy
Tanner, Alastair R.
Al Baghal, Tarek
Calderwood, Lisa
Sloan, Luke S.
Davis, Oliver S. P.
Haworth, Claire M. A.
author_sort Di Cara, Nina H.
collection PubMed
description Background: Cohort studies gather huge volumes of information about a range of phenotypes but new sources of information such as social media data are yet to be integrated. Participant’s long-term engagement with cohort studies, as well as the potential for their social media data to be linked to other longitudinal data, may give participants a unique perspective on the acceptability of this growing research area. Methods: Two focus groups explored participant views towards the acceptability and best practice for the collection of social media data for research purposes. Participants were drawn from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort; individuals from the index cohort of young people (N=9) and from the parent generation (N=5) took part in two separate 90-minute focus groups. The discussions were audio recorded and subjected to qualitative analysis. Results: Participants were generally supportive of the collection of social media data to facilitate health and social research. They felt that their trust in the cohort study would encourage them to do so. Concern was expressed about the collection of data from friends or connections who had not consented. In terms of best practice for collecting the data, participants generally preferred the use of anonymous data derived from social media to be shared with researchers. Conclusion: Cohort studies have trusting relationships with their participants; for this relationship to extend to linking their social media data with longitudinal information, procedural safeguards are needed. Participants understand the goals and potential of research integrating social media data into cohort studies, but further research is required on the acquisition of their friend’s data. The views gathered from participants provide important guidance for future work seeking to integrate social media in cohort studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7459850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74598502020-09-04 Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study Di Cara, Nina H. Boyd, Andy Tanner, Alastair R. Al Baghal, Tarek Calderwood, Lisa Sloan, Luke S. Davis, Oliver S. P. Haworth, Claire M. A. Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: Cohort studies gather huge volumes of information about a range of phenotypes but new sources of information such as social media data are yet to be integrated. Participant’s long-term engagement with cohort studies, as well as the potential for their social media data to be linked to other longitudinal data, may give participants a unique perspective on the acceptability of this growing research area. Methods: Two focus groups explored participant views towards the acceptability and best practice for the collection of social media data for research purposes. Participants were drawn from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort; individuals from the index cohort of young people (N=9) and from the parent generation (N=5) took part in two separate 90-minute focus groups. The discussions were audio recorded and subjected to qualitative analysis. Results: Participants were generally supportive of the collection of social media data to facilitate health and social research. They felt that their trust in the cohort study would encourage them to do so. Concern was expressed about the collection of data from friends or connections who had not consented. In terms of best practice for collecting the data, participants generally preferred the use of anonymous data derived from social media to be shared with researchers. Conclusion: Cohort studies have trusting relationships with their participants; for this relationship to extend to linking their social media data with longitudinal information, procedural safeguards are needed. Participants understand the goals and potential of research integrating social media data into cohort studies, but further research is required on the acquisition of their friend’s data. The views gathered from participants provide important guidance for future work seeking to integrate social media in cohort studies. F1000 Research Limited 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7459850/ /pubmed/32904854 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15755.2 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Di Cara NH et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Di Cara, Nina H.
Boyd, Andy
Tanner, Alastair R.
Al Baghal, Tarek
Calderwood, Lisa
Sloan, Luke S.
Davis, Oliver S. P.
Haworth, Claire M. A.
Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study
title Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study
title_full Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study
title_fullStr Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study
title_short Views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a UK cohort study
title_sort views on social media and its linkage to longitudinal data from two generations of a uk cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904854
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15755.2
work_keys_str_mv AT dicaraninah viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudy
AT boydandy viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudy
AT tanneralastairr viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudy
AT albaghaltarek viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudy
AT calderwoodlisa viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudy
AT sloanlukes viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudy
AT davisoliversp viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudy
AT haworthclairema viewsonsocialmediaanditslinkagetolongitudinaldatafromtwogenerationsofaukcohortstudy