Cargando…

The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Introduction: There is increasing evidence for the use of psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioural therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness based stress reduction therapy, as an approach to management of chronic pain. Similarly, online psychotherapeutic interventions have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haugh, Stephanie, O'Connor, Laura, Slattery, Brian, Hanlon, Michelle, Flynn, Jack, Quinn, Sarah, Jennings, Caroline, McGuire, Brian E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914052
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12953.2
_version_ 1783576470580363264
author Haugh, Stephanie
O'Connor, Laura
Slattery, Brian
Hanlon, Michelle
Flynn, Jack
Quinn, Sarah
Jennings, Caroline
McGuire, Brian E.
author_facet Haugh, Stephanie
O'Connor, Laura
Slattery, Brian
Hanlon, Michelle
Flynn, Jack
Quinn, Sarah
Jennings, Caroline
McGuire, Brian E.
author_sort Haugh, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description Introduction: There is increasing evidence for the use of psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioural therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness based stress reduction therapy, as an approach to management of chronic pain. Similarly, online psychotherapeutic interventions have been shown to be efficacious, and to arguably overcome practical barriers associated with traditional face-to-face treatment for chronic pain. This is a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis aiming to evaluate and rank psychotherapies (delivered in person and online) for chronic pain patients. Methods/ design: Four databases, namely the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO will be searched from inception. Randomised controlled trials that have evaluated psychological interventions for pain management delivered online or in person will be included in the review. Data will be independently extracted in duplicate and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool will be used to assess study quality. Measures of pain interference will be extracted as the primary outcome and measures of psychological distress will be extracted as the secondary outcome. A network meta-analysis will generate indirect comparisons of psychotherapies across treatment trials. Rankings of psychotherapies for chronic pain will be made available.   Discussion: A variety of psychotherapies, delivered both online and in person, have been used in an attempt to help manage chronic pain. Although occasional head to head trials have been conducted, little evidence exists to help identify which psychotherapy is most effective in reducing pain interference. The current review will address this gap in the literature and compare the psychotherapies used for internet delivered and in person interventions for chronic pain in relation to the reduction of pain interference and psychological distress. Results will provide a guide for clinicians when determining treatment course and will inform future research into psychotherapies for chronic pain. PROSPERO registration: CRD42016048518 01/11/16
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7459872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74598722020-09-09 The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Haugh, Stephanie O'Connor, Laura Slattery, Brian Hanlon, Michelle Flynn, Jack Quinn, Sarah Jennings, Caroline McGuire, Brian E. HRB Open Res Study Protocol Introduction: There is increasing evidence for the use of psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioural therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness based stress reduction therapy, as an approach to management of chronic pain. Similarly, online psychotherapeutic interventions have been shown to be efficacious, and to arguably overcome practical barriers associated with traditional face-to-face treatment for chronic pain. This is a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis aiming to evaluate and rank psychotherapies (delivered in person and online) for chronic pain patients. Methods/ design: Four databases, namely the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO will be searched from inception. Randomised controlled trials that have evaluated psychological interventions for pain management delivered online or in person will be included in the review. Data will be independently extracted in duplicate and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool will be used to assess study quality. Measures of pain interference will be extracted as the primary outcome and measures of psychological distress will be extracted as the secondary outcome. A network meta-analysis will generate indirect comparisons of psychotherapies across treatment trials. Rankings of psychotherapies for chronic pain will be made available.   Discussion: A variety of psychotherapies, delivered both online and in person, have been used in an attempt to help manage chronic pain. Although occasional head to head trials have been conducted, little evidence exists to help identify which psychotherapy is most effective in reducing pain interference. The current review will address this gap in the literature and compare the psychotherapies used for internet delivered and in person interventions for chronic pain in relation to the reduction of pain interference and psychological distress. Results will provide a guide for clinicians when determining treatment course and will inform future research into psychotherapies for chronic pain. PROSPERO registration: CRD42016048518 01/11/16 F1000 Research Limited 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7459872/ /pubmed/32914052 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12953.2 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Haugh S et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Haugh, Stephanie
O'Connor, Laura
Slattery, Brian
Hanlon, Michelle
Flynn, Jack
Quinn, Sarah
Jennings, Caroline
McGuire, Brian E.
The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_fullStr The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_short The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_sort relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914052
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12953.2
work_keys_str_mv AT haughstephanie therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT oconnorlaura therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT slatterybrian therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hanlonmichelle therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT flynnjack therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT quinnsarah therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jenningscaroline therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mcguirebriane therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT haughstephanie relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT oconnorlaura relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT slatterybrian relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hanlonmichelle relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT flynnjack relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT quinnsarah relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jenningscaroline relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mcguirebriane relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis