Cargando…
The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Introduction: There is increasing evidence for the use of psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioural therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness based stress reduction therapy, as an approach to management of chronic pain. Similarly, online psychotherapeutic interventions have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914052 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12953.2 |
_version_ | 1783576470580363264 |
---|---|
author | Haugh, Stephanie O'Connor, Laura Slattery, Brian Hanlon, Michelle Flynn, Jack Quinn, Sarah Jennings, Caroline McGuire, Brian E. |
author_facet | Haugh, Stephanie O'Connor, Laura Slattery, Brian Hanlon, Michelle Flynn, Jack Quinn, Sarah Jennings, Caroline McGuire, Brian E. |
author_sort | Haugh, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: There is increasing evidence for the use of psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioural therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness based stress reduction therapy, as an approach to management of chronic pain. Similarly, online psychotherapeutic interventions have been shown to be efficacious, and to arguably overcome practical barriers associated with traditional face-to-face treatment for chronic pain. This is a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis aiming to evaluate and rank psychotherapies (delivered in person and online) for chronic pain patients. Methods/ design: Four databases, namely the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO will be searched from inception. Randomised controlled trials that have evaluated psychological interventions for pain management delivered online or in person will be included in the review. Data will be independently extracted in duplicate and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool will be used to assess study quality. Measures of pain interference will be extracted as the primary outcome and measures of psychological distress will be extracted as the secondary outcome. A network meta-analysis will generate indirect comparisons of psychotherapies across treatment trials. Rankings of psychotherapies for chronic pain will be made available. Discussion: A variety of psychotherapies, delivered both online and in person, have been used in an attempt to help manage chronic pain. Although occasional head to head trials have been conducted, little evidence exists to help identify which psychotherapy is most effective in reducing pain interference. The current review will address this gap in the literature and compare the psychotherapies used for internet delivered and in person interventions for chronic pain in relation to the reduction of pain interference and psychological distress. Results will provide a guide for clinicians when determining treatment course and will inform future research into psychotherapies for chronic pain. PROSPERO registration: CRD42016048518 01/11/16 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7459872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74598722020-09-09 The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Haugh, Stephanie O'Connor, Laura Slattery, Brian Hanlon, Michelle Flynn, Jack Quinn, Sarah Jennings, Caroline McGuire, Brian E. HRB Open Res Study Protocol Introduction: There is increasing evidence for the use of psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioural therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness based stress reduction therapy, as an approach to management of chronic pain. Similarly, online psychotherapeutic interventions have been shown to be efficacious, and to arguably overcome practical barriers associated with traditional face-to-face treatment for chronic pain. This is a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis aiming to evaluate and rank psychotherapies (delivered in person and online) for chronic pain patients. Methods/ design: Four databases, namely the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO will be searched from inception. Randomised controlled trials that have evaluated psychological interventions for pain management delivered online or in person will be included in the review. Data will be independently extracted in duplicate and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool will be used to assess study quality. Measures of pain interference will be extracted as the primary outcome and measures of psychological distress will be extracted as the secondary outcome. A network meta-analysis will generate indirect comparisons of psychotherapies across treatment trials. Rankings of psychotherapies for chronic pain will be made available. Discussion: A variety of psychotherapies, delivered both online and in person, have been used in an attempt to help manage chronic pain. Although occasional head to head trials have been conducted, little evidence exists to help identify which psychotherapy is most effective in reducing pain interference. The current review will address this gap in the literature and compare the psychotherapies used for internet delivered and in person interventions for chronic pain in relation to the reduction of pain interference and psychological distress. Results will provide a guide for clinicians when determining treatment course and will inform future research into psychotherapies for chronic pain. PROSPERO registration: CRD42016048518 01/11/16 F1000 Research Limited 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7459872/ /pubmed/32914052 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12953.2 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Haugh S et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Haugh, Stephanie O'Connor, Laura Slattery, Brian Hanlon, Michelle Flynn, Jack Quinn, Sarah Jennings, Caroline McGuire, Brian E. The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
title | The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
title_full | The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
title_fullStr | The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed | The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
title_short | The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
title_sort | relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914052 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.12953.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haughstephanie therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT oconnorlaura therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT slatterybrian therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT hanlonmichelle therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT flynnjack therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT quinnsarah therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jenningscaroline therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT mcguirebriane therelativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT haughstephanie relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT oconnorlaura relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT slatterybrian relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT hanlonmichelle relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT flynnjack relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT quinnsarah relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jenningscaroline relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT mcguirebriane relativeeffectivenessofpsychotherapeutictechniquesanddeliverymodalitiesforchronicpainaprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |