Cargando…
Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics and Macrophage Immunostimulatory Activities of Polysaccharides from Chlamys farreri
To address the structure–activity relationship of Chlamys farreri polysaccharides on their immunostimulatory efficacy, two polysaccharides (CFP-1 and CFP-2) were extracted from Chlamys farreri by hot water extraction, and separated through column chromatography. The isolated CFPs were chemically ana...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md18080429 |
_version_ | 1783576472698486784 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Fulin Liu, Zhicong Liu, Yang Cheong, Kit-Leong Teng, Bo Khan, Bilal Muhammad |
author_facet | Shi, Fulin Liu, Zhicong Liu, Yang Cheong, Kit-Leong Teng, Bo Khan, Bilal Muhammad |
author_sort | Shi, Fulin |
collection | PubMed |
description | To address the structure–activity relationship of Chlamys farreri polysaccharides on their immunostimulatory efficacy, two polysaccharides (CFP-1 and CFP-2) were extracted from Chlamys farreri by hot water extraction, and separated through column chromatography. The isolated CFPs were chemically analyzed to clarify their physicochemical characteristics and cultured with murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells, in order to evaluate their immunostimulatory efficacy. Despite the fact that both CFP-1 and CFP-2 were mainly comprised of glucose lacking the triple-helix structure, as revealed through preliminary physicochemical analyses, obvious differences in regard to molecular weight (Mw), glucuronic acid content (GAc) and branching degree (BD) were observed between CFP-1 and CFP-2. In in vitro immunostimulatory assays for macrophage RAW264.7 cells, it was demonstrated that CFP-2 with larger Mw, more GAc and BD could evidently promote phagocytosis and increase the production of NO, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β secretion, by activating the expression of iNOS, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β genes, respectively. Hence, CFP-2 shows great promise as a potential immunostimulatory agent in the functional foods and nutraceutical industry, while CFP-1, with lower molecular weight, less GAc and BD, displays its weaker immunostimulatory efficacy, based on the indistinctive immunostimulatory parameters of CFP-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7459881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74598812020-09-02 Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics and Macrophage Immunostimulatory Activities of Polysaccharides from Chlamys farreri Shi, Fulin Liu, Zhicong Liu, Yang Cheong, Kit-Leong Teng, Bo Khan, Bilal Muhammad Mar Drugs Article To address the structure–activity relationship of Chlamys farreri polysaccharides on their immunostimulatory efficacy, two polysaccharides (CFP-1 and CFP-2) were extracted from Chlamys farreri by hot water extraction, and separated through column chromatography. The isolated CFPs were chemically analyzed to clarify their physicochemical characteristics and cultured with murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells, in order to evaluate their immunostimulatory efficacy. Despite the fact that both CFP-1 and CFP-2 were mainly comprised of glucose lacking the triple-helix structure, as revealed through preliminary physicochemical analyses, obvious differences in regard to molecular weight (Mw), glucuronic acid content (GAc) and branching degree (BD) were observed between CFP-1 and CFP-2. In in vitro immunostimulatory assays for macrophage RAW264.7 cells, it was demonstrated that CFP-2 with larger Mw, more GAc and BD could evidently promote phagocytosis and increase the production of NO, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β secretion, by activating the expression of iNOS, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β genes, respectively. Hence, CFP-2 shows great promise as a potential immunostimulatory agent in the functional foods and nutraceutical industry, while CFP-1, with lower molecular weight, less GAc and BD, displays its weaker immunostimulatory efficacy, based on the indistinctive immunostimulatory parameters of CFP-1. MDPI 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7459881/ /pubmed/32824522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md18080429 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shi, Fulin Liu, Zhicong Liu, Yang Cheong, Kit-Leong Teng, Bo Khan, Bilal Muhammad Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics and Macrophage Immunostimulatory Activities of Polysaccharides from Chlamys farreri |
title | Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics and Macrophage Immunostimulatory Activities of Polysaccharides from Chlamys farreri |
title_full | Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics and Macrophage Immunostimulatory Activities of Polysaccharides from Chlamys farreri |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics and Macrophage Immunostimulatory Activities of Polysaccharides from Chlamys farreri |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics and Macrophage Immunostimulatory Activities of Polysaccharides from Chlamys farreri |
title_short | Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics and Macrophage Immunostimulatory Activities of Polysaccharides from Chlamys farreri |
title_sort | comparison of physicochemical characteristics and macrophage immunostimulatory activities of polysaccharides from chlamys farreri |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md18080429 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shifulin comparisonofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsandmacrophageimmunostimulatoryactivitiesofpolysaccharidesfromchlamysfarreri AT liuzhicong comparisonofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsandmacrophageimmunostimulatoryactivitiesofpolysaccharidesfromchlamysfarreri AT liuyang comparisonofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsandmacrophageimmunostimulatoryactivitiesofpolysaccharidesfromchlamysfarreri AT cheongkitleong comparisonofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsandmacrophageimmunostimulatoryactivitiesofpolysaccharidesfromchlamysfarreri AT tengbo comparisonofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsandmacrophageimmunostimulatoryactivitiesofpolysaccharidesfromchlamysfarreri AT khanbilalmuhammad comparisonofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsandmacrophageimmunostimulatoryactivitiesofpolysaccharidesfromchlamysfarreri |