Cargando…
Hybrid Versus Autochthonous Turkey Populations: Homozygous Genomic Regions Occurrences Due to Artificial and Natural Selection
SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this study we investigate the genomic differentiation of traditional Mexican turkey breeds and commercial hybrid strains. The analysis aimed to identify the effects of different types of selection on the birds’ genome structure. Mexican turkeys are characterized by an adaptive sel...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751760 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10081318 |
_version_ | 1783576505296617472 |
---|---|
author | Strillacci, Maria Giuseppina Marelli, Stefano Paolo Martinez-Velazquez, Guillermo |
author_facet | Strillacci, Maria Giuseppina Marelli, Stefano Paolo Martinez-Velazquez, Guillermo |
author_sort | Strillacci, Maria Giuseppina |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this study we investigate the genomic differentiation of traditional Mexican turkey breeds and commercial hybrid strains. The analysis aimed to identify the effects of different types of selection on the birds’ genome structure. Mexican turkeys are characterized by an adaptive selection to their specific original environment; on the other hand, commercial hybrid strains are directionally selected to maximize productive traits and to reduce production costs. The Mexican turkeys were grouped in two geographic subpopulations, while high genomic homogeneity was found in hybrid birds. Traditional breeds and commercial strains are clearly differentiated from a genetic point of view. Inbreeding coefficients were here calculated with different approaches. A clear effect of selection for productive traits was recorded. ABSTRACT: The Mexican turkey population is considered to be the descendant of the original domesticated wild turkey and it is distinct from hybrid strains obtained by the intense artificial selection activity that has occurred during the last 40 years. In this study 30 Mexican turkeys were genomically compared to 38 commercial hybrids using 327,342 SNP markers in order to elucidate the differences in genome variability resulting from different types of selection, i.e., only adaptive for Mexican turkey, and strongly directional for hybrids. Runs of homozygosity (ROH) were detected and the two inbreeding coefficients (F and F(ROH)) based on genomic information were calculated. Principal component and admixture analyses revealed two different clusters for Mexican turkeys (MEX_cl_1 and MEX_cl_2) showing genetic differentiation from hybrids (HYB) (F(ST) equal 0.168 and 0.167, respectively). A total of 3602 ROH were found in the genome of the all turkeys populations. ROH resulted mainly short in length and the ROH_island identified in HYB (n = 9), MEX_cl_1 (n = 1), and MEX_cl_2 (n = 2) include annotated genes related to production traits: abdominal fat (percentage and weight) and egg characteristics (egg shell color and yolk weight). F and F(ROH) resulted correlated to each other only for Mexican populations. Mexican turkey genomic variability allows us to separate the birds into two subgroups according to the geographical origin of samples, while the genomic homogeneity of hybrid birds reflected the strong directional selection occurring in this population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7460020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74600202020-09-02 Hybrid Versus Autochthonous Turkey Populations: Homozygous Genomic Regions Occurrences Due to Artificial and Natural Selection Strillacci, Maria Giuseppina Marelli, Stefano Paolo Martinez-Velazquez, Guillermo Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this study we investigate the genomic differentiation of traditional Mexican turkey breeds and commercial hybrid strains. The analysis aimed to identify the effects of different types of selection on the birds’ genome structure. Mexican turkeys are characterized by an adaptive selection to their specific original environment; on the other hand, commercial hybrid strains are directionally selected to maximize productive traits and to reduce production costs. The Mexican turkeys were grouped in two geographic subpopulations, while high genomic homogeneity was found in hybrid birds. Traditional breeds and commercial strains are clearly differentiated from a genetic point of view. Inbreeding coefficients were here calculated with different approaches. A clear effect of selection for productive traits was recorded. ABSTRACT: The Mexican turkey population is considered to be the descendant of the original domesticated wild turkey and it is distinct from hybrid strains obtained by the intense artificial selection activity that has occurred during the last 40 years. In this study 30 Mexican turkeys were genomically compared to 38 commercial hybrids using 327,342 SNP markers in order to elucidate the differences in genome variability resulting from different types of selection, i.e., only adaptive for Mexican turkey, and strongly directional for hybrids. Runs of homozygosity (ROH) were detected and the two inbreeding coefficients (F and F(ROH)) based on genomic information were calculated. Principal component and admixture analyses revealed two different clusters for Mexican turkeys (MEX_cl_1 and MEX_cl_2) showing genetic differentiation from hybrids (HYB) (F(ST) equal 0.168 and 0.167, respectively). A total of 3602 ROH were found in the genome of the all turkeys populations. ROH resulted mainly short in length and the ROH_island identified in HYB (n = 9), MEX_cl_1 (n = 1), and MEX_cl_2 (n = 2) include annotated genes related to production traits: abdominal fat (percentage and weight) and egg characteristics (egg shell color and yolk weight). F and F(ROH) resulted correlated to each other only for Mexican populations. Mexican turkey genomic variability allows us to separate the birds into two subgroups according to the geographical origin of samples, while the genomic homogeneity of hybrid birds reflected the strong directional selection occurring in this population. MDPI 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7460020/ /pubmed/32751760 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10081318 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Strillacci, Maria Giuseppina Marelli, Stefano Paolo Martinez-Velazquez, Guillermo Hybrid Versus Autochthonous Turkey Populations: Homozygous Genomic Regions Occurrences Due to Artificial and Natural Selection |
title | Hybrid Versus Autochthonous Turkey Populations: Homozygous Genomic Regions Occurrences Due to Artificial and Natural Selection |
title_full | Hybrid Versus Autochthonous Turkey Populations: Homozygous Genomic Regions Occurrences Due to Artificial and Natural Selection |
title_fullStr | Hybrid Versus Autochthonous Turkey Populations: Homozygous Genomic Regions Occurrences Due to Artificial and Natural Selection |
title_full_unstemmed | Hybrid Versus Autochthonous Turkey Populations: Homozygous Genomic Regions Occurrences Due to Artificial and Natural Selection |
title_short | Hybrid Versus Autochthonous Turkey Populations: Homozygous Genomic Regions Occurrences Due to Artificial and Natural Selection |
title_sort | hybrid versus autochthonous turkey populations: homozygous genomic regions occurrences due to artificial and natural selection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751760 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10081318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strillaccimariagiuseppina hybridversusautochthonousturkeypopulationshomozygousgenomicregionsoccurrencesduetoartificialandnaturalselection AT marellistefanopaolo hybridversusautochthonousturkeypopulationshomozygousgenomicregionsoccurrencesduetoartificialandnaturalselection AT martinezvelazquezguillermo hybridversusautochthonousturkeypopulationshomozygousgenomicregionsoccurrencesduetoartificialandnaturalselection |