Cargando…

Review of the Online One Welfare Portal: Shared Curriculum Resources for Veterinary Undergraduate Learning and Teaching in Animal Welfare and Ethics

SIMPLE SUMMARY: All of the veterinary schools in Australia and New Zealand worked together to develop the online One Welfare learning and teaching portal (OWP) for sharing teaching resources to assist veterinary graduates to become leaders in animal welfare and ethics (AWE). The materials in the por...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGreevy, Paul D., Fawcett, Anne, Johnson, Jane, Freire, Rafael, Collins, Teresa, Degeling, Chris, Fisher, Andrew D., Hazel, Susan J., Hood, Jennifer, Lloyd, Janice K. F., Phillips, Clive J. C., Stafford, Kevin, Hyde, Michelle L., Wilson, Bethany, Tzioumis, Vicky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32756492
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10081341
_version_ 1783576592754147328
author McGreevy, Paul D.
Fawcett, Anne
Johnson, Jane
Freire, Rafael
Collins, Teresa
Degeling, Chris
Fisher, Andrew D.
Hazel, Susan J.
Hood, Jennifer
Lloyd, Janice K. F.
Phillips, Clive J. C.
Stafford, Kevin
Hyde, Michelle L.
Wilson, Bethany
Tzioumis, Vicky
author_facet McGreevy, Paul D.
Fawcett, Anne
Johnson, Jane
Freire, Rafael
Collins, Teresa
Degeling, Chris
Fisher, Andrew D.
Hazel, Susan J.
Hood, Jennifer
Lloyd, Janice K. F.
Phillips, Clive J. C.
Stafford, Kevin
Hyde, Michelle L.
Wilson, Bethany
Tzioumis, Vicky
author_sort McGreevy, Paul D.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: All of the veterinary schools in Australia and New Zealand worked together to develop the online One Welfare learning and teaching portal (OWP) for sharing teaching resources to assist veterinary graduates to become leaders in animal welfare and ethics (AWE). The materials in the portal are organised around eight key themes including two overarching themes of animal ethics and animal welfare science, and six context-specific themes: companion animals; animals used in research and teaching; livestock/production animals; animals used for sport, recreation or display; animals in the wild, and aquatic animals. The arrangement of these resources aligns with those of the Australian Animal Welfare Strategy (AAWS). As part of the OWP development, animal welfare educators from the eight veterinary schools met and used modified deliberative polling to prioritise resource development. Surveys of students and educators in all participating schools investigated their attitudes to current AWE issues across six context-specific themes: companion animals; animals used in research and teaching; livestock/production animals; animals used for sport, recreation or display; animals in the wild and aquatic animals. The prioritised resources include (1) student AWE essays arranged by subject; (2) an online reflection tool that can be used repeatedly to gain understanding of change in attitudes over time; (3) eight overarching themes that host a group of interactive scenarios; (4) research papers for each context-specific theme; (5) a bank of multiple choice questions with feedback to support AWE assessment; (6) a novel online discussion tool ‘Chatterbox;’ and (7) a ‘toolbox’ containing directions to the doglogbook, an owner app designed to monitor management practices, and evaluate quality of life in dogs. ABSTRACT: This article introduces the online One Welfare learning and teaching portal (OWP) and describes its development, use, importance and relevance to animal welfare and ethics (AWE) stakeholders. As animal welfare issues increase in importance, veterinarians must be trained to lead the science that underpins AWE discourses. The OWP is a collection of resources designed to engage and challenge veterinary science students as they become advocates for animals. It was developed collaboratively by all eight veterinary schools in Australia and New Zealand, and funded by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. Surveys to investigate the attitudes of students and educators to AWE issues in six context-specific themes based on the Australian Animal Welfare Strategy (AAWS) (companion animals; animals used in research and teaching; livestock/production animals; animals used for sport, recreation or display; animals in the wild and aquatic animals) were administered through all participating schools. Students assigned more importance to Day One competence in knowledge of welfare concepts than did educators for the following groups: production animals, companion animals, animals in the wild, aquatic animals, animals used in research and teaching, and animals used for sport, recreation or display (all p < 0.01). Agreement between educators and students was closer regarding the importance of Day One competence for euthanasia for all six context-specific themes (p < 0.01–0.03). Students assigned more importance than educators to social, economic and cultural drivers of welfare outcomes in production animals (p < 0.01); slaughter and preslaughter inspections in production animals (p < 0.01); animal abuse and hoarding in companion animals (p < 0.01); shelter medicine in companion animals (p < 0.01); disaster preparedness in wildlife animals (p < 0.01); pain and distress caused by fishing in aquatic animals (p < 0.01); conscientious objection related to animals held for research and teaching (p < 0.01); behaviour, selection and training of animals used for sport, recreation and display (p = 0.046) and educating the public around sporting animal welfare (p < 0.01). Agreement between educators and students was closer for strategies to address painful husbandry procedures in production animals (p = 0.03); behaviour and training of companion animals (p = 0.03); veterinarians’ duties to wild animals in wildlife (p = 0.02); the 3Rs in animals held for research and teaching (p = 0.03) and ownership responsibility in sporting animals (p = 0.01). This report discusses the reasons for differences among students and educators as they approach these issues. The portal is expected to gather more content as veterinary schools in other countries use its resources and users submit scenarios and discussion topics that reflect local needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7460400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74604002020-09-02 Review of the Online One Welfare Portal: Shared Curriculum Resources for Veterinary Undergraduate Learning and Teaching in Animal Welfare and Ethics McGreevy, Paul D. Fawcett, Anne Johnson, Jane Freire, Rafael Collins, Teresa Degeling, Chris Fisher, Andrew D. Hazel, Susan J. Hood, Jennifer Lloyd, Janice K. F. Phillips, Clive J. C. Stafford, Kevin Hyde, Michelle L. Wilson, Bethany Tzioumis, Vicky Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: All of the veterinary schools in Australia and New Zealand worked together to develop the online One Welfare learning and teaching portal (OWP) for sharing teaching resources to assist veterinary graduates to become leaders in animal welfare and ethics (AWE). The materials in the portal are organised around eight key themes including two overarching themes of animal ethics and animal welfare science, and six context-specific themes: companion animals; animals used in research and teaching; livestock/production animals; animals used for sport, recreation or display; animals in the wild, and aquatic animals. The arrangement of these resources aligns with those of the Australian Animal Welfare Strategy (AAWS). As part of the OWP development, animal welfare educators from the eight veterinary schools met and used modified deliberative polling to prioritise resource development. Surveys of students and educators in all participating schools investigated their attitudes to current AWE issues across six context-specific themes: companion animals; animals used in research and teaching; livestock/production animals; animals used for sport, recreation or display; animals in the wild and aquatic animals. The prioritised resources include (1) student AWE essays arranged by subject; (2) an online reflection tool that can be used repeatedly to gain understanding of change in attitudes over time; (3) eight overarching themes that host a group of interactive scenarios; (4) research papers for each context-specific theme; (5) a bank of multiple choice questions with feedback to support AWE assessment; (6) a novel online discussion tool ‘Chatterbox;’ and (7) a ‘toolbox’ containing directions to the doglogbook, an owner app designed to monitor management practices, and evaluate quality of life in dogs. ABSTRACT: This article introduces the online One Welfare learning and teaching portal (OWP) and describes its development, use, importance and relevance to animal welfare and ethics (AWE) stakeholders. As animal welfare issues increase in importance, veterinarians must be trained to lead the science that underpins AWE discourses. The OWP is a collection of resources designed to engage and challenge veterinary science students as they become advocates for animals. It was developed collaboratively by all eight veterinary schools in Australia and New Zealand, and funded by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. Surveys to investigate the attitudes of students and educators to AWE issues in six context-specific themes based on the Australian Animal Welfare Strategy (AAWS) (companion animals; animals used in research and teaching; livestock/production animals; animals used for sport, recreation or display; animals in the wild and aquatic animals) were administered through all participating schools. Students assigned more importance to Day One competence in knowledge of welfare concepts than did educators for the following groups: production animals, companion animals, animals in the wild, aquatic animals, animals used in research and teaching, and animals used for sport, recreation or display (all p < 0.01). Agreement between educators and students was closer regarding the importance of Day One competence for euthanasia for all six context-specific themes (p < 0.01–0.03). Students assigned more importance than educators to social, economic and cultural drivers of welfare outcomes in production animals (p < 0.01); slaughter and preslaughter inspections in production animals (p < 0.01); animal abuse and hoarding in companion animals (p < 0.01); shelter medicine in companion animals (p < 0.01); disaster preparedness in wildlife animals (p < 0.01); pain and distress caused by fishing in aquatic animals (p < 0.01); conscientious objection related to animals held for research and teaching (p < 0.01); behaviour, selection and training of animals used for sport, recreation and display (p = 0.046) and educating the public around sporting animal welfare (p < 0.01). Agreement between educators and students was closer for strategies to address painful husbandry procedures in production animals (p = 0.03); behaviour and training of companion animals (p = 0.03); veterinarians’ duties to wild animals in wildlife (p = 0.02); the 3Rs in animals held for research and teaching (p = 0.03) and ownership responsibility in sporting animals (p = 0.01). This report discusses the reasons for differences among students and educators as they approach these issues. The portal is expected to gather more content as veterinary schools in other countries use its resources and users submit scenarios and discussion topics that reflect local needs. MDPI 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7460400/ /pubmed/32756492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10081341 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
McGreevy, Paul D.
Fawcett, Anne
Johnson, Jane
Freire, Rafael
Collins, Teresa
Degeling, Chris
Fisher, Andrew D.
Hazel, Susan J.
Hood, Jennifer
Lloyd, Janice K. F.
Phillips, Clive J. C.
Stafford, Kevin
Hyde, Michelle L.
Wilson, Bethany
Tzioumis, Vicky
Review of the Online One Welfare Portal: Shared Curriculum Resources for Veterinary Undergraduate Learning and Teaching in Animal Welfare and Ethics
title Review of the Online One Welfare Portal: Shared Curriculum Resources for Veterinary Undergraduate Learning and Teaching in Animal Welfare and Ethics
title_full Review of the Online One Welfare Portal: Shared Curriculum Resources for Veterinary Undergraduate Learning and Teaching in Animal Welfare and Ethics
title_fullStr Review of the Online One Welfare Portal: Shared Curriculum Resources for Veterinary Undergraduate Learning and Teaching in Animal Welfare and Ethics
title_full_unstemmed Review of the Online One Welfare Portal: Shared Curriculum Resources for Veterinary Undergraduate Learning and Teaching in Animal Welfare and Ethics
title_short Review of the Online One Welfare Portal: Shared Curriculum Resources for Veterinary Undergraduate Learning and Teaching in Animal Welfare and Ethics
title_sort review of the online one welfare portal: shared curriculum resources for veterinary undergraduate learning and teaching in animal welfare and ethics
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32756492
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10081341
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgreevypauld reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT fawcettanne reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT johnsonjane reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT freirerafael reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT collinsteresa reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT degelingchris reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT fisherandrewd reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT hazelsusanj reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT hoodjennifer reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT lloydjanicekf reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT phillipsclivejc reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT staffordkevin reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT hydemichellel reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT wilsonbethany reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics
AT tzioumisvicky reviewoftheonlineonewelfareportalsharedcurriculumresourcesforveterinaryundergraduatelearningandteachinginanimalwelfareandethics