Cargando…

Compensatory Health Beliefs on Breastfeeding Varying by Breastfeeding Status; A Scale Development

Aims: To examine whether compensatory health beliefs (CHB) on breastfeeding vary as a function of breastfeeding status among mothers of infants. Methods: Participants included 773 women aged 18 and older (M = 32.8) who gave birth in the last two years; 445 were breastfeeding exclusively, 165 were br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neter, Efrat, Bagants, Levana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784938
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165759
_version_ 1783576598531801088
author Neter, Efrat
Bagants, Levana
author_facet Neter, Efrat
Bagants, Levana
author_sort Neter, Efrat
collection PubMed
description Aims: To examine whether compensatory health beliefs (CHB) on breastfeeding vary as a function of breastfeeding status among mothers of infants. Methods: Participants included 773 women aged 18 and older (M = 32.8) who gave birth in the last two years; 445 were breastfeeding exclusively, 165 were breastfeeding partially, and 163 were not breastfeeding. They responded to a survey posted on social media sites’ closed groups that focused on post-natal issues. Design was cross-sectional, with CHB as the outcome variable (14 items) and demographics and feeding status as the explanatory variables. Results: The internal reliability of the CHB scale was α = 0.87. There was a statistically significant difference in the level of CHB between non-breastfeeding women, breastfeeding women, and women who combined breastfeeding with infant formula, so that non- breastfeeding women had the highest level of CHB. There was no significant difference in CHB by either birth experience or demographic characteristics. Conclusion: This study extended CHB to breastfeeding, documenting the minimization of the disadvantages of not breastfeeding by non-breastfeeding women, attempting to neutralize or reduce the cognitive dissonance between non-nursing and optimal infant care. Possible uses of the scale for counselling were suggested, both in the prenatal and post-natal period, proactively bringing forward and addressing ambivalence towards breastfeeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7460425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74604252020-09-03 Compensatory Health Beliefs on Breastfeeding Varying by Breastfeeding Status; A Scale Development Neter, Efrat Bagants, Levana Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Aims: To examine whether compensatory health beliefs (CHB) on breastfeeding vary as a function of breastfeeding status among mothers of infants. Methods: Participants included 773 women aged 18 and older (M = 32.8) who gave birth in the last two years; 445 were breastfeeding exclusively, 165 were breastfeeding partially, and 163 were not breastfeeding. They responded to a survey posted on social media sites’ closed groups that focused on post-natal issues. Design was cross-sectional, with CHB as the outcome variable (14 items) and demographics and feeding status as the explanatory variables. Results: The internal reliability of the CHB scale was α = 0.87. There was a statistically significant difference in the level of CHB between non-breastfeeding women, breastfeeding women, and women who combined breastfeeding with infant formula, so that non- breastfeeding women had the highest level of CHB. There was no significant difference in CHB by either birth experience or demographic characteristics. Conclusion: This study extended CHB to breastfeeding, documenting the minimization of the disadvantages of not breastfeeding by non-breastfeeding women, attempting to neutralize or reduce the cognitive dissonance between non-nursing and optimal infant care. Possible uses of the scale for counselling were suggested, both in the prenatal and post-natal period, proactively bringing forward and addressing ambivalence towards breastfeeding. MDPI 2020-08-09 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7460425/ /pubmed/32784938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165759 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Neter, Efrat
Bagants, Levana
Compensatory Health Beliefs on Breastfeeding Varying by Breastfeeding Status; A Scale Development
title Compensatory Health Beliefs on Breastfeeding Varying by Breastfeeding Status; A Scale Development
title_full Compensatory Health Beliefs on Breastfeeding Varying by Breastfeeding Status; A Scale Development
title_fullStr Compensatory Health Beliefs on Breastfeeding Varying by Breastfeeding Status; A Scale Development
title_full_unstemmed Compensatory Health Beliefs on Breastfeeding Varying by Breastfeeding Status; A Scale Development
title_short Compensatory Health Beliefs on Breastfeeding Varying by Breastfeeding Status; A Scale Development
title_sort compensatory health beliefs on breastfeeding varying by breastfeeding status; a scale development
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784938
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165759
work_keys_str_mv AT neterefrat compensatoryhealthbeliefsonbreastfeedingvaryingbybreastfeedingstatusascaledevelopment
AT bagantslevana compensatoryhealthbeliefsonbreastfeedingvaryingbybreastfeedingstatusascaledevelopment