Cargando…

The Association Between Keratoconus and Mitral Valve Prolapse: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: The debate pertaining to the association between Keratoconus (KC) and Mitral Valve Prolapse (MVP) continues to occur among physicians. The results of cross-sectional studies attempting to present the co-existing prevalence of these two diseases remain indeterminate. We compiled the first...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siordia, Juan A., Franco, Jimena C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31782369
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573403X15666191129100928
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The debate pertaining to the association between Keratoconus (KC) and Mitral Valve Prolapse (MVP) continues to occur among physicians. The results of cross-sectional studies attempting to present the co-existing prevalence of these two diseases remain indeterminate. We compiled the first meta-analysis to determine the pattern of prevalence between the two diseases. METHODS: Two separate literature searches for cross-sectional studies were performed for this meta-analysis. The first search encompassed finding literature comparing the prevalence of KC between patients with MVP and a control group. The second search pertained to finding studies comparing the prevalence of MVP patients with KC and a control group. RESULTS: Six studies reported the prevalence of MVP in patients with KC and a control group. The prevalence was 41.6% in patients with KC and 11.5% in patients without KC (OR = 7.06 [95% CI = 2.41-20.64]). There was a significant heterogeneity among the studies (I(2) = 84%). Two studies showed the prevalence of KC in patients with MVP and a control group. The prevalence was 17.0% in patients with KC and 2.9% in the control group (OR = 5.07 [95% CI = 1.08-23.83]). There was no heterogeneity within the analysis (I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSION: There is a statistically significant co-existing prevalence between MVP and KC. Patients with KC are more likely to present with MVP, and patients with MVP are more likely to present with KC.