Cargando…
Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change
In European research and innovation policy, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and Open Science (OS) encompass two co-existing sets of ambitions concerning systemic change in the practice of research and innovation. This paper is an exploratory attempt to uncover synergies and differences bet...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32869131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-020-00103-5 |
_version_ | 1783576674125742080 |
---|---|
author | Shelley-Egan, Clare Gjefsen, Mads Dahl Nydal, Rune |
author_facet | Shelley-Egan, Clare Gjefsen, Mads Dahl Nydal, Rune |
author_sort | Shelley-Egan, Clare |
collection | PubMed |
description | In European research and innovation policy, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and Open Science (OS) encompass two co-existing sets of ambitions concerning systemic change in the practice of research and innovation. This paper is an exploratory attempt to uncover synergies and differences between RRI and OS, by interrogating what motivates their respective transformative agendas. We offer two storylines that account for the specific contexts and dynamics from which RRI and OS have emerged, which in turn offer entrance points to further unpacking what ‘opening up’ to society means with respect to the transformative change agendas that are implicit in the two agendas. We compare differences regarding the ‘how’ of opening up in light of the ‘why’ to explore common areas of emphasis in both OS and RRI. We argue that while both agendas align with mission-oriented narratives around grand societal challenges, OS tends to emphasize efficiency and technical optimisation over RRI’s emphasis on normative concerns and democracy deficits, and that the two agendas thus contrast in their relative legitimate emphasis on doable outcomes versus desirable outcomes. In our conclusion, we reflect on the future outlook for RRI and OS’ co-existence and uptake, and on what their respective ambitions for transformation might mean for science-society scholars and scholarship. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7460767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74607672020-09-11 Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change Shelley-Egan, Clare Gjefsen, Mads Dahl Nydal, Rune Life Sci Soc Policy Research In European research and innovation policy, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and Open Science (OS) encompass two co-existing sets of ambitions concerning systemic change in the practice of research and innovation. This paper is an exploratory attempt to uncover synergies and differences between RRI and OS, by interrogating what motivates their respective transformative agendas. We offer two storylines that account for the specific contexts and dynamics from which RRI and OS have emerged, which in turn offer entrance points to further unpacking what ‘opening up’ to society means with respect to the transformative change agendas that are implicit in the two agendas. We compare differences regarding the ‘how’ of opening up in light of the ‘why’ to explore common areas of emphasis in both OS and RRI. We argue that while both agendas align with mission-oriented narratives around grand societal challenges, OS tends to emphasize efficiency and technical optimisation over RRI’s emphasis on normative concerns and democracy deficits, and that the two agendas thus contrast in their relative legitimate emphasis on doable outcomes versus desirable outcomes. In our conclusion, we reflect on the future outlook for RRI and OS’ co-existence and uptake, and on what their respective ambitions for transformation might mean for science-society scholars and scholarship. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7460767/ /pubmed/32869131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-020-00103-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Shelley-Egan, Clare Gjefsen, Mads Dahl Nydal, Rune Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change |
title | Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change |
title_full | Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change |
title_fullStr | Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change |
title_full_unstemmed | Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change |
title_short | Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change |
title_sort | consolidating rri and open science: understanding the potential for transformative change |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32869131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-020-00103-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shelleyeganclare consolidatingrriandopenscienceunderstandingthepotentialfortransformativechange AT gjefsenmadsdahl consolidatingrriandopenscienceunderstandingthepotentialfortransformativechange AT nydalrune consolidatingrriandopenscienceunderstandingthepotentialfortransformativechange |