Cargando…

Approaches to management of cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients – cross-sectional survey among cardio-oncology experts

BACKGROUND: In cardio-oncology, a range of clinical dilemmas can be identified where high-quality evidence for management is still lacking. The aim of this project was to study clinical practices and expert approaches to several clinical cardio-oncological dilemmas regarding prediction, prevention a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hedayati, E., Papakonstantinou, A., Månsson-Broberg, A., Bergh, J., Hubbert, L., Altena, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32884837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40959-020-00070-y
_version_ 1783576679451459584
author Hedayati, E.
Papakonstantinou, A.
Månsson-Broberg, A.
Bergh, J.
Hubbert, L.
Altena, R.
author_facet Hedayati, E.
Papakonstantinou, A.
Månsson-Broberg, A.
Bergh, J.
Hubbert, L.
Altena, R.
author_sort Hedayati, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In cardio-oncology, a range of clinical dilemmas can be identified where high-quality evidence for management is still lacking. The aim of this project was to study clinical practices and expert approaches to several clinical cardio-oncological dilemmas regarding prediction, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease in adult cancer patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was sent out to internationally renowned experts in the field of cardio-oncology. Participants were selected based on being first or last authors of papers in the field of cardio-oncology, or principal investigators to trials in this field. RESULTS: Topics discussed include, among others, the use of biomarkers for subclinical cardiovascular toxicity, approaches towards primary prevention and follow-up with medication and life-style recommendations, and management of fluoropyrimidine-vasospasm, QTc-prolongation and asymptomatic declines in left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: The answers provided in this survey have shed light on expert-based practices in cardio-oncologic dilemmas. Attitudes towards, as well as discrepancies in those dilemmas are presented. Existing discrepancies clearly indicate the need for generation of high-quality data that allows for more evidence-based recommendations in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7460793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74607932020-09-02 Approaches to management of cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients – cross-sectional survey among cardio-oncology experts Hedayati, E. Papakonstantinou, A. Månsson-Broberg, A. Bergh, J. Hubbert, L. Altena, R. Cardiooncology Research BACKGROUND: In cardio-oncology, a range of clinical dilemmas can be identified where high-quality evidence for management is still lacking. The aim of this project was to study clinical practices and expert approaches to several clinical cardio-oncological dilemmas regarding prediction, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease in adult cancer patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was sent out to internationally renowned experts in the field of cardio-oncology. Participants were selected based on being first or last authors of papers in the field of cardio-oncology, or principal investigators to trials in this field. RESULTS: Topics discussed include, among others, the use of biomarkers for subclinical cardiovascular toxicity, approaches towards primary prevention and follow-up with medication and life-style recommendations, and management of fluoropyrimidine-vasospasm, QTc-prolongation and asymptomatic declines in left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: The answers provided in this survey have shed light on expert-based practices in cardio-oncologic dilemmas. Attitudes towards, as well as discrepancies in those dilemmas are presented. Existing discrepancies clearly indicate the need for generation of high-quality data that allows for more evidence-based recommendations in the future. BioMed Central 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7460793/ /pubmed/32884837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40959-020-00070-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hedayati, E.
Papakonstantinou, A.
Månsson-Broberg, A.
Bergh, J.
Hubbert, L.
Altena, R.
Approaches to management of cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients – cross-sectional survey among cardio-oncology experts
title Approaches to management of cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients – cross-sectional survey among cardio-oncology experts
title_full Approaches to management of cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients – cross-sectional survey among cardio-oncology experts
title_fullStr Approaches to management of cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients – cross-sectional survey among cardio-oncology experts
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to management of cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients – cross-sectional survey among cardio-oncology experts
title_short Approaches to management of cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients – cross-sectional survey among cardio-oncology experts
title_sort approaches to management of cardiovascular morbidity in adult cancer patients – cross-sectional survey among cardio-oncology experts
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32884837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40959-020-00070-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hedayatie approachestomanagementofcardiovascularmorbidityinadultcancerpatientscrosssectionalsurveyamongcardiooncologyexperts
AT papakonstantinoua approachestomanagementofcardiovascularmorbidityinadultcancerpatientscrosssectionalsurveyamongcardiooncologyexperts
AT manssonbroberga approachestomanagementofcardiovascularmorbidityinadultcancerpatientscrosssectionalsurveyamongcardiooncologyexperts
AT berghj approachestomanagementofcardiovascularmorbidityinadultcancerpatientscrosssectionalsurveyamongcardiooncologyexperts
AT hubbertl approachestomanagementofcardiovascularmorbidityinadultcancerpatientscrosssectionalsurveyamongcardiooncologyexperts
AT altenar approachestomanagementofcardiovascularmorbidityinadultcancerpatientscrosssectionalsurveyamongcardiooncologyexperts