Cargando…
Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission
BACKGROUND: Since the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, there have been many scientific reports regarding gastrointestinal manifestations. Several reports indicate the possibility of viral shedding via faeces and the possibility of faecal‐oral transmission. AIMS: To critically assess the clinical rele...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16036 |
_version_ | 1783576730632454144 |
---|---|
author | van Doorn, Amarylle S. Meijer, Berrie Frampton, Chris M. A. Barclay, Murray L. de Boer, Nanne K. H. |
author_facet | van Doorn, Amarylle S. Meijer, Berrie Frampton, Chris M. A. Barclay, Murray L. de Boer, Nanne K. H. |
author_sort | van Doorn, Amarylle S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Since the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, there have been many scientific reports regarding gastrointestinal manifestations. Several reports indicate the possibility of viral shedding via faeces and the possibility of faecal‐oral transmission. AIMS: To critically assess the clinical relevance of testing stool samples and anal swabs and provide an overview of the potential faecal‐oral transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2. METHODS: A systematic literature search with MeSH terms was performed, scrutinising the Embase database, Google scholar, MEDLINE database through PubMed and The Cochrane Library, including articles from December 2019 until July 7 2020. Data were subsequently analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Ninety‐five studies were included in the qualitative analysis. 934/2149 (43%) patients tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 in stool samples or anal swabs, with positive test results up to 70 days after symptom onset. A meta‐analysis executed with studies of at least 10 patients revealed a pooled positive proportion of 51.8% (95% CI 43.8 ‐ 59.7%). Positive faecal samples of 282/443 patients (64%) remained positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 for a mean of 12.5 days, up to 33 days maximum, after respiratory samples became negative for SARS‐CoV‐2. Viable SARS‐CoV‐2 was found in 6/17 (35%) patients in whom this was specifically investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Viral shedding of SARS‐CoV‐2 in stool samples occurs in a substantial proportion of patients, making faecal‐oral transmission plausible. Furthermore, detection in stool samples or anal swabs can persist long after negative respiratory testing. Therefore, stool sample or anal swab testing should be (re)considered in relation to decisions for isolating or discharging a patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7461227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74612272020-09-02 Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission van Doorn, Amarylle S. Meijer, Berrie Frampton, Chris M. A. Barclay, Murray L. de Boer, Nanne K. H. Aliment Pharmacol Ther Systematic Reviews with Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Since the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, there have been many scientific reports regarding gastrointestinal manifestations. Several reports indicate the possibility of viral shedding via faeces and the possibility of faecal‐oral transmission. AIMS: To critically assess the clinical relevance of testing stool samples and anal swabs and provide an overview of the potential faecal‐oral transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2. METHODS: A systematic literature search with MeSH terms was performed, scrutinising the Embase database, Google scholar, MEDLINE database through PubMed and The Cochrane Library, including articles from December 2019 until July 7 2020. Data were subsequently analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Ninety‐five studies were included in the qualitative analysis. 934/2149 (43%) patients tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 in stool samples or anal swabs, with positive test results up to 70 days after symptom onset. A meta‐analysis executed with studies of at least 10 patients revealed a pooled positive proportion of 51.8% (95% CI 43.8 ‐ 59.7%). Positive faecal samples of 282/443 patients (64%) remained positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 for a mean of 12.5 days, up to 33 days maximum, after respiratory samples became negative for SARS‐CoV‐2. Viable SARS‐CoV‐2 was found in 6/17 (35%) patients in whom this was specifically investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Viral shedding of SARS‐CoV‐2 in stool samples occurs in a substantial proportion of patients, making faecal‐oral transmission plausible. Furthermore, detection in stool samples or anal swabs can persist long after negative respiratory testing. Therefore, stool sample or anal swab testing should be (re)considered in relation to decisions for isolating or discharging a patient. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-27 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7461227/ /pubmed/32852082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16036 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews with Meta‐analysis van Doorn, Amarylle S. Meijer, Berrie Frampton, Chris M. A. Barclay, Murray L. de Boer, Nanne K. H. Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission |
title | Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission |
title_full | Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission |
title_fullStr | Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission |
title_short | Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission |
title_sort | systematic review with meta‐analysis: sars‐cov‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission |
topic | Systematic Reviews with Meta‐analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandoornamarylles systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission AT meijerberrie systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission AT framptonchrisma systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission AT barclaymurrayl systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission AT deboernannekh systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission |