Cargando…

Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission

BACKGROUND: Since the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, there have been many scientific reports regarding gastrointestinal manifestations. Several reports indicate the possibility of viral shedding via faeces and the possibility of faecal‐oral transmission. AIMS: To critically assess the clinical rele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Doorn, Amarylle S., Meijer, Berrie, Frampton, Chris M. A., Barclay, Murray L., de Boer, Nanne K. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16036
_version_ 1783576730632454144
author van Doorn, Amarylle S.
Meijer, Berrie
Frampton, Chris M. A.
Barclay, Murray L.
de Boer, Nanne K. H.
author_facet van Doorn, Amarylle S.
Meijer, Berrie
Frampton, Chris M. A.
Barclay, Murray L.
de Boer, Nanne K. H.
author_sort van Doorn, Amarylle S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, there have been many scientific reports regarding gastrointestinal manifestations. Several reports indicate the possibility of viral shedding via faeces and the possibility of faecal‐oral transmission. AIMS: To critically assess the clinical relevance of testing stool samples and anal swabs and provide an overview of the potential faecal‐oral transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2. METHODS: A systematic literature search with MeSH terms was performed, scrutinising the Embase database, Google scholar, MEDLINE database through PubMed and The Cochrane Library, including articles from December 2019 until July 7 2020. Data were subsequently analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Ninety‐five studies were included in the qualitative analysis. 934/2149 (43%) patients tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 in stool samples or anal swabs, with positive test results up to 70 days after symptom onset. A meta‐analysis executed with studies of at least 10 patients revealed a pooled positive proportion of 51.8% (95% CI 43.8 ‐ 59.7%). Positive faecal samples of 282/443 patients (64%) remained positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 for a mean of 12.5 days, up to 33 days maximum, after respiratory samples became negative for SARS‐CoV‐2. Viable SARS‐CoV‐2 was found in 6/17 (35%) patients in whom this was specifically investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Viral shedding of SARS‐CoV‐2 in stool samples occurs in a substantial proportion of patients, making faecal‐oral transmission plausible. Furthermore, detection in stool samples or anal swabs can persist long after negative respiratory testing. Therefore, stool sample or anal swab testing should be (re)considered in relation to decisions for isolating or discharging a patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7461227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74612272020-09-02 Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission van Doorn, Amarylle S. Meijer, Berrie Frampton, Chris M. A. Barclay, Murray L. de Boer, Nanne K. H. Aliment Pharmacol Ther Systematic Reviews with Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Since the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, there have been many scientific reports regarding gastrointestinal manifestations. Several reports indicate the possibility of viral shedding via faeces and the possibility of faecal‐oral transmission. AIMS: To critically assess the clinical relevance of testing stool samples and anal swabs and provide an overview of the potential faecal‐oral transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2. METHODS: A systematic literature search with MeSH terms was performed, scrutinising the Embase database, Google scholar, MEDLINE database through PubMed and The Cochrane Library, including articles from December 2019 until July 7 2020. Data were subsequently analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Ninety‐five studies were included in the qualitative analysis. 934/2149 (43%) patients tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 in stool samples or anal swabs, with positive test results up to 70 days after symptom onset. A meta‐analysis executed with studies of at least 10 patients revealed a pooled positive proportion of 51.8% (95% CI 43.8 ‐ 59.7%). Positive faecal samples of 282/443 patients (64%) remained positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 for a mean of 12.5 days, up to 33 days maximum, after respiratory samples became negative for SARS‐CoV‐2. Viable SARS‐CoV‐2 was found in 6/17 (35%) patients in whom this was specifically investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Viral shedding of SARS‐CoV‐2 in stool samples occurs in a substantial proportion of patients, making faecal‐oral transmission plausible. Furthermore, detection in stool samples or anal swabs can persist long after negative respiratory testing. Therefore, stool sample or anal swab testing should be (re)considered in relation to decisions for isolating or discharging a patient. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-27 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7461227/ /pubmed/32852082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16036 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews with Meta‐analysis
van Doorn, Amarylle S.
Meijer, Berrie
Frampton, Chris M. A.
Barclay, Murray L.
de Boer, Nanne K. H.
Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission
title Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission
title_full Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission
title_fullStr Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission
title_short Systematic review with meta‐analysis: SARS‐CoV‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission
title_sort systematic review with meta‐analysis: sars‐cov‐2 stool testing and the potential for faecal‐oral transmission
topic Systematic Reviews with Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16036
work_keys_str_mv AT vandoornamarylles systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission
AT meijerberrie systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission
AT framptonchrisma systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission
AT barclaymurrayl systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission
AT deboernannekh systematicreviewwithmetaanalysissarscov2stooltestingandthepotentialforfaecaloraltransmission