Cargando…

Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation

BACKGROUND: Our human societies and certainly also (bio) medicine are more and more permeated with technology. There seems to be an increasing awareness among bioethicists that an effective and comprehensive approach to ethically guide these emerging biomedical innovations into society is needed. Su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jongsma, Karin R., Bredenoord, Annelien L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00524-z
_version_ 1783576733017964544
author Jongsma, Karin R.
Bredenoord, Annelien L.
author_facet Jongsma, Karin R.
Bredenoord, Annelien L.
author_sort Jongsma, Karin R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our human societies and certainly also (bio) medicine are more and more permeated with technology. There seems to be an increasing awareness among bioethicists that an effective and comprehensive approach to ethically guide these emerging biomedical innovations into society is needed. Such an approach has not been spelled out yet for bioethics, while there are frequent calls for ethical guidance of biomedical innovation, also by biomedical researchers themselves. New and emerging biotechnologies require anticipation of possible effects and implications, meaning the scope is not evaluative after a technology has been fully developed or about hypothetical technologies, but real-time for a real biotechnology. MAIN TEXT: In this paper we aim to substantiate and discuss six ingredients that we increasingly see adopted by ethicists and that together constitute “ethics parallel research”. This approach allows to fulfil two aims: guiding the development process of technologies in biomedicine and providing input for the normative evaluation of such technologies. The six ingredients of ethics parallel research are: (1) disentangling wicked problems, (2) upstream or midstream ethical analysis, (3) ethics from within, (4) inclusion of empirical research, (5) public participation and (6) mapping societal impacts, including hard and soft impacts. We will draw on gene editing, organoid technology and artificial intelligence as examples to illustrate these six ingredients. CONCLUSION: Ethics parallel research brings together these ingredients to ethically analyse and proactively or parallel guide technological development. It widens the roles and judgements from the ethicist to a more anticipatory and constructively guiding role. Ethics parallel research is characterised by a constructive, rather than a purely critical perspective, it focusses on developing best-practices rather than outlining worst practice, and draws on insights from social sciences and philosophy of technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7461257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74612572020-09-02 Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation Jongsma, Karin R. Bredenoord, Annelien L. BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: Our human societies and certainly also (bio) medicine are more and more permeated with technology. There seems to be an increasing awareness among bioethicists that an effective and comprehensive approach to ethically guide these emerging biomedical innovations into society is needed. Such an approach has not been spelled out yet for bioethics, while there are frequent calls for ethical guidance of biomedical innovation, also by biomedical researchers themselves. New and emerging biotechnologies require anticipation of possible effects and implications, meaning the scope is not evaluative after a technology has been fully developed or about hypothetical technologies, but real-time for a real biotechnology. MAIN TEXT: In this paper we aim to substantiate and discuss six ingredients that we increasingly see adopted by ethicists and that together constitute “ethics parallel research”. This approach allows to fulfil two aims: guiding the development process of technologies in biomedicine and providing input for the normative evaluation of such technologies. The six ingredients of ethics parallel research are: (1) disentangling wicked problems, (2) upstream or midstream ethical analysis, (3) ethics from within, (4) inclusion of empirical research, (5) public participation and (6) mapping societal impacts, including hard and soft impacts. We will draw on gene editing, organoid technology and artificial intelligence as examples to illustrate these six ingredients. CONCLUSION: Ethics parallel research brings together these ingredients to ethically analyse and proactively or parallel guide technological development. It widens the roles and judgements from the ethicist to a more anticipatory and constructively guiding role. Ethics parallel research is characterised by a constructive, rather than a purely critical perspective, it focusses on developing best-practices rather than outlining worst practice, and draws on insights from social sciences and philosophy of technology. BioMed Central 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7461257/ /pubmed/32867753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00524-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Debate
Jongsma, Karin R.
Bredenoord, Annelien L.
Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
title Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
title_full Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
title_fullStr Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
title_full_unstemmed Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
title_short Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
title_sort ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00524-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jongsmakarinr ethicsparallelresearchanapproachforearlyethicalguidanceofbiomedicalinnovation
AT bredenoordannelienl ethicsparallelresearchanapproachforearlyethicalguidanceofbiomedicalinnovation