Cargando…
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review
Background: Gambling disorder (GD) is the most common behavioral addiction and shares pathophysiological and clinical features with substance use disorders (SUDs). Effective therapeutic interventions for GD are lacking. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may represent a promising treatment option...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013280 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00729 |
_version_ | 1783576799609880576 |
---|---|
author | Zucchella, Chiara Mantovani, Elisa Federico, Angela Lugoboni, Fabio Tamburin, Stefano |
author_facet | Zucchella, Chiara Mantovani, Elisa Federico, Angela Lugoboni, Fabio Tamburin, Stefano |
author_sort | Zucchella, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Gambling disorder (GD) is the most common behavioral addiction and shares pathophysiological and clinical features with substance use disorders (SUDs). Effective therapeutic interventions for GD are lacking. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may represent a promising treatment option for GD. Objective: This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive and structured overview of studies applying NIBS techniques to GD and problem gambling. Methods: A literature search using Pubmed, Web of Science, and Science Direct was conducted from databases inception to December 19, 2019, for studies assessing the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) on subjects with GD or problem gambling. Studies using NIBS techniques on healthy subjects and those without therapeutic goals but only aiming to assess basic neurophysiology measures were excluded. Results: A total of 269 articles were title and abstract screened, 13 full texts were assessed, and 11 were included, of which six were controlled and five were uncontrolled. Most studies showed a reduction of gambling behavior, craving for gambling, and gambling-related symptoms. NIBS effects on psychiatric symptoms were less consistent. A decrease of the behavioral activation related to gambling was also reported. Some studies reported modulation of behavioral measures (i.e., impulsivity, cognitive and attentional control, decision making, cognitive flexibility). Studies were not consistent in terms of NIBS protocol, site of stimulation, clinical and surrogate outcome measures, and duration of treatment and follow-up. Sample size was small in most studies. Conclusions: The clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the included studies prevented us from drawing any firm conclusion on the efficacy of NIBS interventions for GD. Further methodologically sound, robust, and well-powered studies are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7461832 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74618322020-10-01 Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review Zucchella, Chiara Mantovani, Elisa Federico, Angela Lugoboni, Fabio Tamburin, Stefano Front Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Gambling disorder (GD) is the most common behavioral addiction and shares pathophysiological and clinical features with substance use disorders (SUDs). Effective therapeutic interventions for GD are lacking. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may represent a promising treatment option for GD. Objective: This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive and structured overview of studies applying NIBS techniques to GD and problem gambling. Methods: A literature search using Pubmed, Web of Science, and Science Direct was conducted from databases inception to December 19, 2019, for studies assessing the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) on subjects with GD or problem gambling. Studies using NIBS techniques on healthy subjects and those without therapeutic goals but only aiming to assess basic neurophysiology measures were excluded. Results: A total of 269 articles were title and abstract screened, 13 full texts were assessed, and 11 were included, of which six were controlled and five were uncontrolled. Most studies showed a reduction of gambling behavior, craving for gambling, and gambling-related symptoms. NIBS effects on psychiatric symptoms were less consistent. A decrease of the behavioral activation related to gambling was also reported. Some studies reported modulation of behavioral measures (i.e., impulsivity, cognitive and attentional control, decision making, cognitive flexibility). Studies were not consistent in terms of NIBS protocol, site of stimulation, clinical and surrogate outcome measures, and duration of treatment and follow-up. Sample size was small in most studies. Conclusions: The clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the included studies prevented us from drawing any firm conclusion on the efficacy of NIBS interventions for GD. Further methodologically sound, robust, and well-powered studies are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7461832/ /pubmed/33013280 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00729 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zucchella, Mantovani, Federico, Lugoboni and Tamburin. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Zucchella, Chiara Mantovani, Elisa Federico, Angela Lugoboni, Fabio Tamburin, Stefano Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review |
title | Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | non-invasive brain stimulation for gambling disorder: a systematic review |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013280 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zucchellachiara noninvasivebrainstimulationforgamblingdisorderasystematicreview AT mantovanielisa noninvasivebrainstimulationforgamblingdisorderasystematicreview AT federicoangela noninvasivebrainstimulationforgamblingdisorderasystematicreview AT lugobonifabio noninvasivebrainstimulationforgamblingdisorderasystematicreview AT tamburinstefano noninvasivebrainstimulationforgamblingdisorderasystematicreview |