Cargando…

‘I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.’ On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a new approach to paediatric research whereby we involved children in analysing qualitative data, and to reflect on the involvement process. SETTING: This was a single-centre, qualitative study in the Netherlands. It consisted of research meetings with indi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luchtenberg, Malou L, Maeckelberghe, Els L M, Verhagen, AA Eduard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034433
_version_ 1783576860909633536
author Luchtenberg, Malou L
Maeckelberghe, Els L M
Verhagen, AA Eduard
author_facet Luchtenberg, Malou L
Maeckelberghe, Els L M
Verhagen, AA Eduard
author_sort Luchtenberg, Malou L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a new approach to paediatric research whereby we involved children in analysing qualitative data, and to reflect on the involvement process. SETTING: This was a single-centre, qualitative study in the Netherlands. It consisted of research meetings with individual children at home (Phase I) or group meetings at school (Phase II). In Phase I, we identified themes from a video interview during five one-on-one meetings between a child co-researcher and the adult researcher. In Phase II, during two group meetings, we explored the themes in detail using fragments from 16 interviews. PARTICIPANTS: We involved 14 school children (aged 10 to 14 years) as co-researchers to analyse children’s interviews about their experience while participating in medical research. Notes were taken, and children provided feedback. A thematic analysis was performed using a framework approach. RESULTS: All co-researchers identified themes. The time needed to complete the task varied, as did the extent to which the meetings needed to be structured to improve concentration. The children rated time investment as adequate and they considered acting as co-researcher interesting and fun, adding that they had learnt new skills and gained new knowledge. The experience also led them to reflect on health matters in their own lives. The adult researchers considered the process relatively time intensive, but the project did result in a more critical assessment of their own work. CONCLUSION: The new, two-phase approach of involving children to help analyse qualitative data is a feasible research method. The novelty lies in involving children to help identify themes from original interview data, thereby limiting preselection of data by adults, before exploring these themes in detail. Videos make it easier for children to understand the data and to empathise with the interviewees, and limits time investment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7462149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74621492020-09-11 ‘I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.’ On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands Luchtenberg, Malou L Maeckelberghe, Els L M Verhagen, AA Eduard BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a new approach to paediatric research whereby we involved children in analysing qualitative data, and to reflect on the involvement process. SETTING: This was a single-centre, qualitative study in the Netherlands. It consisted of research meetings with individual children at home (Phase I) or group meetings at school (Phase II). In Phase I, we identified themes from a video interview during five one-on-one meetings between a child co-researcher and the adult researcher. In Phase II, during two group meetings, we explored the themes in detail using fragments from 16 interviews. PARTICIPANTS: We involved 14 school children (aged 10 to 14 years) as co-researchers to analyse children’s interviews about their experience while participating in medical research. Notes were taken, and children provided feedback. A thematic analysis was performed using a framework approach. RESULTS: All co-researchers identified themes. The time needed to complete the task varied, as did the extent to which the meetings needed to be structured to improve concentration. The children rated time investment as adequate and they considered acting as co-researcher interesting and fun, adding that they had learnt new skills and gained new knowledge. The experience also led them to reflect on health matters in their own lives. The adult researchers considered the process relatively time intensive, but the project did result in a more critical assessment of their own work. CONCLUSION: The new, two-phase approach of involving children to help analyse qualitative data is a feasible research method. The novelty lies in involving children to help identify themes from original interview data, thereby limiting preselection of data by adults, before exploring these themes in detail. Videos make it easier for children to understand the data and to empathise with the interviewees, and limits time investment. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7462149/ /pubmed/32868347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034433 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Luchtenberg, Malou L
Maeckelberghe, Els L M
Verhagen, AA Eduard
‘I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.’ On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands
title ‘I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.’ On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands
title_full ‘I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.’ On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands
title_fullStr ‘I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.’ On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed ‘I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.’ On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands
title_short ‘I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.’ On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands
title_sort ‘i actually felt like i was a researcher myself.’ on involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the netherlands
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034433
work_keys_str_mv AT luchtenbergmaloul iactuallyfeltlikeiwasaresearchermyselfoninvolvingchildrenintheanalysisofqualitativepaediatricresearchinthenetherlands
AT maeckelbergheelslm iactuallyfeltlikeiwasaresearchermyselfoninvolvingchildrenintheanalysisofqualitativepaediatricresearchinthenetherlands
AT verhagenaaeduard iactuallyfeltlikeiwasaresearchermyselfoninvolvingchildrenintheanalysisofqualitativepaediatricresearchinthenetherlands