Cargando…

Long‐term antithrombotic management patterns in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: 2‐year observations from the EPICOR Asia study

BACKGROUND: Despite guideline recommendations, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is frequently used for longer than 1 year after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event. In Asia, information on antithrombotic management patterns (AMPs), including DAPT post discharge, is sparse. This analysis evaluated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Bo, Huo, Yong, Lee, Stephen W.‐L., Sawhney, Jitendra P. S., Kim, Hyo‐Soo, Krittayaphong, Rungroj, Pocock, Stuart J., Nhan, Vo T., Alonso Garcia, Angeles, Chin, Chee Tang, Jiang, Jie, Jan, Stephen, Vega, Ana Maria, Hayashi, Nobuya, Ong, Tiong K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32618009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23400
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Despite guideline recommendations, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is frequently used for longer than 1 year after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event. In Asia, information on antithrombotic management patterns (AMPs), including DAPT post discharge, is sparse. This analysis evaluated real‐world AMPs up to 2 years post discharge for ACS. HYPOTHESIS: There is wide variability in AMP use for ACS management in Asia. METHODS: EPICOR Asia (NCT01361386) is a prospective observational study of patients discharged after hospitalization for an ACS in eight countries/regions in Asia, followed up for 2 years. Here, we describe AMPs used and present an exploratory analysis of characteristics and outcomes in patients who received DAPT for ≤12 months post discharge compared with >12 months. RESULTS: Data were available for 12 922 patients; of 11 639 patients discharged on DAPT, 2364 (20.3%) received DAPT for ≤12 months and 9275 (79.7%) for >12 months, with approximately 60% still on DAPT at 2 years. Patients who received DAPT for >12 months were more likely to be younger, obese, lower Killip class, resident in India (vs China), and to have received invasive reperfusion. Clinical event rates during year 2 of follow‐up were lower in patients with DAPT >12 vs ≤12 months, but no causal association can be implied in this non‐randomized study. CONCLUSIONS: Most ACS patients remained on DAPT up to 1 year, in accordance with current guidelines, and over half remained on DAPT at 2 years post discharge. Patients not on DAPT at 12 months are a higher risk group requiring careful monitoring.