Cargando…

Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation

INTRODUCTION: We present practical metrics for estimating the expected health benefits of specific research proposals. These can be used by research funders, researchers and healthcare decision-makers within low-income and middle-income countries to support evidence-based research prioritisation. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, Beth, Schmitt, Laetitia, Rothery, Claire, Phillips, Andrew, Hallett, Timothy B, Revill, Paul, Claxton, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002152
_version_ 1783576876829114368
author Woods, Beth
Schmitt, Laetitia
Rothery, Claire
Phillips, Andrew
Hallett, Timothy B
Revill, Paul
Claxton, Karl
author_facet Woods, Beth
Schmitt, Laetitia
Rothery, Claire
Phillips, Andrew
Hallett, Timothy B
Revill, Paul
Claxton, Karl
author_sort Woods, Beth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We present practical metrics for estimating the expected health benefits of specific research proposals. These can be used by research funders, researchers and healthcare decision-makers within low-income and middle-income countries to support evidence-based research prioritisation. METHODS: The methods require three key assessments: (1) the current level of uncertainty around the endpoints the proposed study will measure; (2) how uncertainty impacts on the health benefits and costs of healthcare programmes and (3) the health opportunity costs imposed by programme costs. Research is valuable because it can improve health by informing the choice of which programmes should be implemented. We provide a Microsoft Excel tool to allow readers to generate estimates of the health benefits of research studies based on these three assessments. The tool can be populated using existing studies, existing cost-effectiveness models and expert opinion. Where such evidence is not available, the tool can quantify the value of research under different assumptions. Estimates of the health benefits of research can be considered alongside research costs, and the consequences of delaying implementation until research reports, to determine whether research is worthwhile. We illustrate the method using a case study of research on HIV self-testing programmes in Malawi. This analysis combines data from the literature with outputs from the HIV synthesis model. RESULTS: For this case study, we found a costing study that could be completed and inform decision making within 1 year offered the highest health benefits (67 000 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted). Research on outcomes improved population health to a lesser extent (12 000 DALYs averted) and only if carried out alongside programme implementation. CONCLUSION: Our work provides a method for estimating the health benefits of research in a practical and timely fashion. This can be used to support accountable use of research funds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7462234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74622342020-09-11 Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation Woods, Beth Schmitt, Laetitia Rothery, Claire Phillips, Andrew Hallett, Timothy B Revill, Paul Claxton, Karl BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: We present practical metrics for estimating the expected health benefits of specific research proposals. These can be used by research funders, researchers and healthcare decision-makers within low-income and middle-income countries to support evidence-based research prioritisation. METHODS: The methods require three key assessments: (1) the current level of uncertainty around the endpoints the proposed study will measure; (2) how uncertainty impacts on the health benefits and costs of healthcare programmes and (3) the health opportunity costs imposed by programme costs. Research is valuable because it can improve health by informing the choice of which programmes should be implemented. We provide a Microsoft Excel tool to allow readers to generate estimates of the health benefits of research studies based on these three assessments. The tool can be populated using existing studies, existing cost-effectiveness models and expert opinion. Where such evidence is not available, the tool can quantify the value of research under different assumptions. Estimates of the health benefits of research can be considered alongside research costs, and the consequences of delaying implementation until research reports, to determine whether research is worthwhile. We illustrate the method using a case study of research on HIV self-testing programmes in Malawi. This analysis combines data from the literature with outputs from the HIV synthesis model. RESULTS: For this case study, we found a costing study that could be completed and inform decision making within 1 year offered the highest health benefits (67 000 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted). Research on outcomes improved population health to a lesser extent (12 000 DALYs averted) and only if carried out alongside programme implementation. CONCLUSION: Our work provides a method for estimating the health benefits of research in a practical and timely fashion. This can be used to support accountable use of research funds. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7462234/ /pubmed/32868268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002152 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Woods, Beth
Schmitt, Laetitia
Rothery, Claire
Phillips, Andrew
Hallett, Timothy B
Revill, Paul
Claxton, Karl
Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation
title Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation
title_full Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation
title_fullStr Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation
title_full_unstemmed Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation
title_short Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation
title_sort practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002152
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsbeth practicalmetricsforestablishingthehealthbenefitsofresearchtosupportresearchprioritisation
AT schmittlaetitia practicalmetricsforestablishingthehealthbenefitsofresearchtosupportresearchprioritisation
AT rotheryclaire practicalmetricsforestablishingthehealthbenefitsofresearchtosupportresearchprioritisation
AT phillipsandrew practicalmetricsforestablishingthehealthbenefitsofresearchtosupportresearchprioritisation
AT halletttimothyb practicalmetricsforestablishingthehealthbenefitsofresearchtosupportresearchprioritisation
AT revillpaul practicalmetricsforestablishingthehealthbenefitsofresearchtosupportresearchprioritisation
AT claxtonkarl practicalmetricsforestablishingthehealthbenefitsofresearchtosupportresearchprioritisation