Cargando…

Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE: The S0226 trial demonstrated that the combination of half-dose fulvestrant (FUL) and anastrozole (ANA) (F&A) caused a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) versus ANA monotherapy for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic brea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Xiaoting, Weng, Xiuhua, Lin, Shen, Liu, Yiwei, Luo, Shaohong, Wang, Hang, Ming, Wai-kit, Huang, Pinfang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036107
_version_ 1783576879657123840
author Huang, Xiaoting
Weng, Xiuhua
Lin, Shen
Liu, Yiwei
Luo, Shaohong
Wang, Hang
Ming, Wai-kit
Huang, Pinfang
author_facet Huang, Xiaoting
Weng, Xiuhua
Lin, Shen
Liu, Yiwei
Luo, Shaohong
Wang, Hang
Ming, Wai-kit
Huang, Pinfang
author_sort Huang, Xiaoting
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The S0226 trial demonstrated that the combination of half-dose fulvestrant (FUL) and anastrozole (ANA) (F&A) caused a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) versus ANA monotherapy for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (PMW-MBC (HR+)). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of F&A in the first-line treatment for PMW-MBC (HR+) in China. DESIGN: We constructed a Markov model over a life-time horizon. The clinical outcomes and utility data were obtained from published literature. Cost data were obtained from official Chinese websites. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test result uncertainty. SETTING: Chinese healthcare system perspective. POPULATION: A hypothetical cohort of adult patients presenting with PMW-MBC (HR+). INTERVENTIONS: F&A compared with full-dose FUL and ANAmonotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome of this study was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). RESULTS: ANA was estimated to have the lowest cost and minimum life-years. The ICER of F&A versus ANA was US$15 665.891/QALY with incremental cost and QALY of US$12 401.120 and 0.792, respectively, which was less than the willingness-to-pay of US$29 383/QALY. Compared with F&A, FUL yielded a higher cost and a shorter lifetime; hence, it was identified as a dominated strategy. The univariate sensitivity analysis indicated the price of FUL was the most influential factor in our study. The probability that F&A was cost-effective at a threshold of US$29 383/QALY in China was 86.5%. CONCLUSION: F&A is a cost-effective alternative to FUL and ANA monotherapy for the first-line treatment of PMW-MBC (HR+) in China. F&A is a promising first-line treatment for PMW-MBC (HR+), and more research is needed to evaluate the economy of using F&A in other countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7462248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74622482020-09-11 Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis Huang, Xiaoting Weng, Xiuhua Lin, Shen Liu, Yiwei Luo, Shaohong Wang, Hang Ming, Wai-kit Huang, Pinfang BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: The S0226 trial demonstrated that the combination of half-dose fulvestrant (FUL) and anastrozole (ANA) (F&A) caused a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) versus ANA monotherapy for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (PMW-MBC (HR+)). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of F&A in the first-line treatment for PMW-MBC (HR+) in China. DESIGN: We constructed a Markov model over a life-time horizon. The clinical outcomes and utility data were obtained from published literature. Cost data were obtained from official Chinese websites. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test result uncertainty. SETTING: Chinese healthcare system perspective. POPULATION: A hypothetical cohort of adult patients presenting with PMW-MBC (HR+). INTERVENTIONS: F&A compared with full-dose FUL and ANAmonotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome of this study was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). RESULTS: ANA was estimated to have the lowest cost and minimum life-years. The ICER of F&A versus ANA was US$15 665.891/QALY with incremental cost and QALY of US$12 401.120 and 0.792, respectively, which was less than the willingness-to-pay of US$29 383/QALY. Compared with F&A, FUL yielded a higher cost and a shorter lifetime; hence, it was identified as a dominated strategy. The univariate sensitivity analysis indicated the price of FUL was the most influential factor in our study. The probability that F&A was cost-effective at a threshold of US$29 383/QALY in China was 86.5%. CONCLUSION: F&A is a cost-effective alternative to FUL and ANA monotherapy for the first-line treatment of PMW-MBC (HR+) in China. F&A is a promising first-line treatment for PMW-MBC (HR+), and more research is needed to evaluate the economy of using F&A in other countries. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7462248/ /pubmed/32868353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036107 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Huang, Xiaoting
Weng, Xiuhua
Lin, Shen
Liu, Yiwei
Luo, Shaohong
Wang, Hang
Ming, Wai-kit
Huang, Pinfang
Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036107
work_keys_str_mv AT huangxiaoting halfdosefulvestrantplusanastrozoleasafirstlinetreatmentforhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT wengxiuhua halfdosefulvestrantplusanastrozoleasafirstlinetreatmentforhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT linshen halfdosefulvestrantplusanastrozoleasafirstlinetreatmentforhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT liuyiwei halfdosefulvestrantplusanastrozoleasafirstlinetreatmentforhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT luoshaohong halfdosefulvestrantplusanastrozoleasafirstlinetreatmentforhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT wanghang halfdosefulvestrantplusanastrozoleasafirstlinetreatmentforhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT mingwaikit halfdosefulvestrantplusanastrozoleasafirstlinetreatmentforhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcanceracosteffectivenessanalysis
AT huangpinfang halfdosefulvestrantplusanastrozoleasafirstlinetreatmentforhormonereceptorpositivemetastaticbreastcanceracosteffectivenessanalysis