Cargando…
Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
OBJECTIVES: External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to ext...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850 |
_version_ | 1783576879888859136 |
---|---|
author | Hovlid, Einar Braut, Geir Sverre Hannisdal, Einar Walshe, Kieran Bukve, Oddbjørn Flottorp, Signe Stensland, Per Frich, Jan C |
author_facet | Hovlid, Einar Braut, Geir Sverre Hannisdal, Einar Walshe, Kieran Bukve, Oddbjørn Flottorp, Signe Stensland, Per Frich, Jan C |
author_sort | Hovlid, Einar |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspections. METHODS: We performed a literature search (1980–January 2020) to identify empirical studies addressing change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspection. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we performed a narrative synthesis to identify mediators of change. RESULTS: We included 95 studies. Accreditation was the most frequent type of inspection (n=68), followed by statutory inspections (n=19), and external peer review (n=9). Our findings suggest that the regulatory context in which the inspections take place affect how they are acted on by those being inspected. The way inspections are conducted seem to be critical for how the inspection findings are perceived and followed up. Inspections can engage and involve staff, facilitate leader engagement, improve communication and enable the creation of new networks for reflection on clinical practice. Inspections can contribute to creating an awareness of the inspected organisation’s current practice and performance gaps, and a commitment to change. Moreover, they can contribute to facilitating the planning and implementation of change, as well as self-evaluation and the use of data to evaluate performance. CONCLUSIONS: External inspections can affect different mediators of organisational change. The way and to what extent they do depend on a range of factors related to the outer setting, the way inspections are conducted and how they are perceived and acted on by the inspected organisation. To improve the quality of care, the organisational change processes need to involve and impact the way care is delivered to the patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7462249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74622492020-09-11 Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis Hovlid, Einar Braut, Geir Sverre Hannisdal, Einar Walshe, Kieran Bukve, Oddbjørn Flottorp, Signe Stensland, Per Frich, Jan C BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspections. METHODS: We performed a literature search (1980–January 2020) to identify empirical studies addressing change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspection. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we performed a narrative synthesis to identify mediators of change. RESULTS: We included 95 studies. Accreditation was the most frequent type of inspection (n=68), followed by statutory inspections (n=19), and external peer review (n=9). Our findings suggest that the regulatory context in which the inspections take place affect how they are acted on by those being inspected. The way inspections are conducted seem to be critical for how the inspection findings are perceived and followed up. Inspections can engage and involve staff, facilitate leader engagement, improve communication and enable the creation of new networks for reflection on clinical practice. Inspections can contribute to creating an awareness of the inspected organisation’s current practice and performance gaps, and a commitment to change. Moreover, they can contribute to facilitating the planning and implementation of change, as well as self-evaluation and the use of data to evaluate performance. CONCLUSIONS: External inspections can affect different mediators of organisational change. The way and to what extent they do depend on a range of factors related to the outer setting, the way inspections are conducted and how they are perceived and acted on by the inspected organisation. To improve the quality of care, the organisational change processes need to involve and impact the way care is delivered to the patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7462249/ /pubmed/32868366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Hovlid, Einar Braut, Geir Sverre Hannisdal, Einar Walshe, Kieran Bukve, Oddbjørn Flottorp, Signe Stensland, Per Frich, Jan C Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis |
title | Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis |
title_full | Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis |
title_fullStr | Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis |
title_short | Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis |
title_sort | mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hovlideinar mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis AT brautgeirsverre mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis AT hannisdaleinar mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis AT walshekieran mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis AT bukveoddbjørn mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis AT flottorpsigne mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis AT stenslandper mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis AT frichjanc mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis |