Cargando…

Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

OBJECTIVES: External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to ext...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hovlid, Einar, Braut, Geir Sverre, Hannisdal, Einar, Walshe, Kieran, Bukve, Oddbjørn, Flottorp, Signe, Stensland, Per, Frich, Jan C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850
_version_ 1783576879888859136
author Hovlid, Einar
Braut, Geir Sverre
Hannisdal, Einar
Walshe, Kieran
Bukve, Oddbjørn
Flottorp, Signe
Stensland, Per
Frich, Jan C
author_facet Hovlid, Einar
Braut, Geir Sverre
Hannisdal, Einar
Walshe, Kieran
Bukve, Oddbjørn
Flottorp, Signe
Stensland, Per
Frich, Jan C
author_sort Hovlid, Einar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspections. METHODS: We performed a literature search (1980–January 2020) to identify empirical studies addressing change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspection. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we performed a narrative synthesis to identify mediators of change. RESULTS: We included 95 studies. Accreditation was the most frequent type of inspection (n=68), followed by statutory inspections (n=19), and external peer review (n=9). Our findings suggest that the regulatory context in which the inspections take place affect how they are acted on by those being inspected. The way inspections are conducted seem to be critical for how the inspection findings are perceived and followed up. Inspections can engage and involve staff, facilitate leader engagement, improve communication and enable the creation of new networks for reflection on clinical practice. Inspections can contribute to creating an awareness of the inspected organisation’s current practice and performance gaps, and a commitment to change. Moreover, they can contribute to facilitating the planning and implementation of change, as well as self-evaluation and the use of data to evaluate performance. CONCLUSIONS: External inspections can affect different mediators of organisational change. The way and to what extent they do depend on a range of factors related to the outer setting, the way inspections are conducted and how they are perceived and acted on by the inspected organisation. To improve the quality of care, the organisational change processes need to involve and impact the way care is delivered to the patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7462249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74622492020-09-11 Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis Hovlid, Einar Braut, Geir Sverre Hannisdal, Einar Walshe, Kieran Bukve, Oddbjørn Flottorp, Signe Stensland, Per Frich, Jan C BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspections. METHODS: We performed a literature search (1980–January 2020) to identify empirical studies addressing change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspection. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we performed a narrative synthesis to identify mediators of change. RESULTS: We included 95 studies. Accreditation was the most frequent type of inspection (n=68), followed by statutory inspections (n=19), and external peer review (n=9). Our findings suggest that the regulatory context in which the inspections take place affect how they are acted on by those being inspected. The way inspections are conducted seem to be critical for how the inspection findings are perceived and followed up. Inspections can engage and involve staff, facilitate leader engagement, improve communication and enable the creation of new networks for reflection on clinical practice. Inspections can contribute to creating an awareness of the inspected organisation’s current practice and performance gaps, and a commitment to change. Moreover, they can contribute to facilitating the planning and implementation of change, as well as self-evaluation and the use of data to evaluate performance. CONCLUSIONS: External inspections can affect different mediators of organisational change. The way and to what extent they do depend on a range of factors related to the outer setting, the way inspections are conducted and how they are perceived and acted on by the inspected organisation. To improve the quality of care, the organisational change processes need to involve and impact the way care is delivered to the patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7462249/ /pubmed/32868366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Hovlid, Einar
Braut, Geir Sverre
Hannisdal, Einar
Walshe, Kieran
Bukve, Oddbjørn
Flottorp, Signe
Stensland, Per
Frich, Jan C
Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
title Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_full Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_short Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
title_sort mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32868366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850
work_keys_str_mv AT hovlideinar mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT brautgeirsverre mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT hannisdaleinar mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT walshekieran mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT bukveoddbjørn mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT flottorpsigne mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT stenslandper mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis
AT frichjanc mediatorsofchangeinhealthcareorganisationssubjecttoexternalassessmentasystematicreviewwithnarrativesynthesis