Cargando…

Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study was to evaluate the awareness of different ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists in the USA and the most commonly used debonding technique for ceramic bracket removal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey on preference for debonding and awareness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ngan, Aileen Y., Bollu, Prashanti, Chaudhry, Kishore, Stevens, Richard, Subramani, Karthikeyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904974
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56976
_version_ 1783576903472381952
author Ngan, Aileen Y.
Bollu, Prashanti
Chaudhry, Kishore
Stevens, Richard
Subramani, Karthikeyan
author_facet Ngan, Aileen Y.
Bollu, Prashanti
Chaudhry, Kishore
Stevens, Richard
Subramani, Karthikeyan
author_sort Ngan, Aileen Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study was to evaluate the awareness of different ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists in the USA and the most commonly used debonding technique for ceramic bracket removal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey on preference for debonding and awareness of debonding techniques was emailed to 2,227 members of the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO). RESULTS: 119 orthodontists completed the survey. 111 responses were included in the study analysis of ceramic bracket users. The most common technique used was mechanical debonding. 86.5% used a specially designed bracket removing plier from the manufacturer. Overall, there were 59.5% of surveyed orthodontists who were aware of electrothermal debonding, 73% were unaware of ultrasonic debonding and 83.8% were unaware of laser debonding. There were more orthodontists with an affiliation with an academic institution aware of electrothermal debonding (p=0.002). There also was a trend of orthodontists having no affiliation with an institution who were unaware of laser debonding (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed that the majority of orthodontists who responded to the questionnaire were unaware of alternative debonding techniques of ceramic brackets. All orthodontists who use ceramic brackets utilized mechanical debonding technique. Key words:Orthodontic ceramic brackets, mechanical, electrothermal, ultrasonic, laser debonding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7462376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74623762020-09-04 Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists Ngan, Aileen Y. Bollu, Prashanti Chaudhry, Kishore Stevens, Richard Subramani, Karthikeyan J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study was to evaluate the awareness of different ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists in the USA and the most commonly used debonding technique for ceramic bracket removal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey on preference for debonding and awareness of debonding techniques was emailed to 2,227 members of the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO). RESULTS: 119 orthodontists completed the survey. 111 responses were included in the study analysis of ceramic bracket users. The most common technique used was mechanical debonding. 86.5% used a specially designed bracket removing plier from the manufacturer. Overall, there were 59.5% of surveyed orthodontists who were aware of electrothermal debonding, 73% were unaware of ultrasonic debonding and 83.8% were unaware of laser debonding. There were more orthodontists with an affiliation with an academic institution aware of electrothermal debonding (p=0.002). There also was a trend of orthodontists having no affiliation with an institution who were unaware of laser debonding (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed that the majority of orthodontists who responded to the questionnaire were unaware of alternative debonding techniques of ceramic brackets. All orthodontists who use ceramic brackets utilized mechanical debonding technique. Key words:Orthodontic ceramic brackets, mechanical, electrothermal, ultrasonic, laser debonding. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7462376/ /pubmed/32904974 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56976 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ngan, Aileen Y.
Bollu, Prashanti
Chaudhry, Kishore
Stevens, Richard
Subramani, Karthikeyan
Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists
title Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists
title_full Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists
title_fullStr Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists
title_full_unstemmed Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists
title_short Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists
title_sort survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32904974
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.56976
work_keys_str_mv AT nganaileeny surveyonawarenessandpreferenceofceramicbracketdebondingtechniquesamongorthodontists
AT bolluprashanti surveyonawarenessandpreferenceofceramicbracketdebondingtechniquesamongorthodontists
AT chaudhrykishore surveyonawarenessandpreferenceofceramicbracketdebondingtechniquesamongorthodontists
AT stevensrichard surveyonawarenessandpreferenceofceramicbracketdebondingtechniquesamongorthodontists
AT subramanikarthikeyan surveyonawarenessandpreferenceofceramicbracketdebondingtechniquesamongorthodontists