Cargando…
Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months
PURPOSE: To assess accuracy and adherence of visual field (VF) home monitoring in a pilot sample of patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal feasibility and reliability study. METHODS: Twenty adults (median 71 years) with an established diagnosis of glaucoma were issued a tablet peri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.039 |
_version_ | 1783576944430809088 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Pete R. Campbell, Peter Callaghan, Tamsin Jones, Lee Asfaw, Daniel S. Edgar, David F. Crabb, David P. |
author_facet | Jones, Pete R. Campbell, Peter Callaghan, Tamsin Jones, Lee Asfaw, Daniel S. Edgar, David F. Crabb, David P. |
author_sort | Jones, Pete R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess accuracy and adherence of visual field (VF) home monitoring in a pilot sample of patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal feasibility and reliability study. METHODS: Twenty adults (median 71 years) with an established diagnosis of glaucoma were issued a tablet perimeter (Eyecatcher) and were asked to perform 1 VF home assessment per eye, per month, for 6 months (12 tests total). Before and after home monitoring, 2 VF assessments were performed in clinic using standard automated perimetry (4 tests total, per eye). RESULTS: All 20 participants could perform monthly home monitoring, though 1 participant stopped after 4 months (adherence: 98% of tests). There was good concordance between VFs measured at home and in the clinic (r = 0.94, P < .001). In 21 of 236 tests (9%), mean deviation deviated by more than ±3 dB from the median. Many of these anomalous tests could be identified by applying machine learning techniques to recordings from the tablets' front-facing camera (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.78). Adding home-monitoring data to 2 standard automated perimetry tests made 6 months apart reduced measurement error (between-test measurement variability) in 97% of eyes, with mean absolute error more than halving in 90% of eyes. Median test duration was 4.5 minutes (quartiles: 3.9-5.2 minutes). Substantial variations in ambient illumination had no observable effect on VF measurements (r = 0.07, P = .320). CONCLUSIONS: Home monitoring of VFs is viable for some patients and may provide clinically useful data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7462567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74625672020-09-02 Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months Jones, Pete R. Campbell, Peter Callaghan, Tamsin Jones, Lee Asfaw, Daniel S. Edgar, David F. Crabb, David P. Am J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To assess accuracy and adherence of visual field (VF) home monitoring in a pilot sample of patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal feasibility and reliability study. METHODS: Twenty adults (median 71 years) with an established diagnosis of glaucoma were issued a tablet perimeter (Eyecatcher) and were asked to perform 1 VF home assessment per eye, per month, for 6 months (12 tests total). Before and after home monitoring, 2 VF assessments were performed in clinic using standard automated perimetry (4 tests total, per eye). RESULTS: All 20 participants could perform monthly home monitoring, though 1 participant stopped after 4 months (adherence: 98% of tests). There was good concordance between VFs measured at home and in the clinic (r = 0.94, P < .001). In 21 of 236 tests (9%), mean deviation deviated by more than ±3 dB from the median. Many of these anomalous tests could be identified by applying machine learning techniques to recordings from the tablets' front-facing camera (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.78). Adding home-monitoring data to 2 standard automated perimetry tests made 6 months apart reduced measurement error (between-test measurement variability) in 97% of eyes, with mean absolute error more than halving in 90% of eyes. Median test duration was 4.5 minutes (quartiles: 3.9-5.2 minutes). Substantial variations in ambient illumination had no observable effect on VF measurements (r = 0.07, P = .320). CONCLUSIONS: Home monitoring of VFs is viable for some patients and may provide clinically useful data. Elsevier Inc. 2021-03 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7462567/ /pubmed/32882222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.039 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jones, Pete R. Campbell, Peter Callaghan, Tamsin Jones, Lee Asfaw, Daniel S. Edgar, David F. Crabb, David P. Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months |
title | Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months |
title_full | Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months |
title_fullStr | Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months |
title_full_unstemmed | Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months |
title_short | Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months |
title_sort | glaucoma home monitoring using a tablet-based visual field test (eyecatcher): an assessment of accuracy and adherence over 6 months |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonespeter glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months AT campbellpeter glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months AT callaghantamsin glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months AT joneslee glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months AT asfawdaniels glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months AT edgardavidf glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months AT crabbdavidp glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months |