Cargando…

Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months

PURPOSE: To assess accuracy and adherence of visual field (VF) home monitoring in a pilot sample of patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal feasibility and reliability study. METHODS: Twenty adults (median 71 years) with an established diagnosis of glaucoma were issued a tablet peri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Pete R., Campbell, Peter, Callaghan, Tamsin, Jones, Lee, Asfaw, Daniel S., Edgar, David F., Crabb, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.039
_version_ 1783576944430809088
author Jones, Pete R.
Campbell, Peter
Callaghan, Tamsin
Jones, Lee
Asfaw, Daniel S.
Edgar, David F.
Crabb, David P.
author_facet Jones, Pete R.
Campbell, Peter
Callaghan, Tamsin
Jones, Lee
Asfaw, Daniel S.
Edgar, David F.
Crabb, David P.
author_sort Jones, Pete R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess accuracy and adherence of visual field (VF) home monitoring in a pilot sample of patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal feasibility and reliability study. METHODS: Twenty adults (median 71 years) with an established diagnosis of glaucoma were issued a tablet perimeter (Eyecatcher) and were asked to perform 1 VF home assessment per eye, per month, for 6 months (12 tests total). Before and after home monitoring, 2 VF assessments were performed in clinic using standard automated perimetry (4 tests total, per eye). RESULTS: All 20 participants could perform monthly home monitoring, though 1 participant stopped after 4 months (adherence: 98% of tests). There was good concordance between VFs measured at home and in the clinic (r = 0.94, P < .001). In 21 of 236 tests (9%), mean deviation deviated by more than ±3 dB from the median. Many of these anomalous tests could be identified by applying machine learning techniques to recordings from the tablets' front-facing camera (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.78). Adding home-monitoring data to 2 standard automated perimetry tests made 6 months apart reduced measurement error (between-test measurement variability) in 97% of eyes, with mean absolute error more than halving in 90% of eyes. Median test duration was 4.5 minutes (quartiles: 3.9-5.2 minutes). Substantial variations in ambient illumination had no observable effect on VF measurements (r = 0.07, P = .320). CONCLUSIONS: Home monitoring of VFs is viable for some patients and may provide clinically useful data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7462567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74625672020-09-02 Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months Jones, Pete R. Campbell, Peter Callaghan, Tamsin Jones, Lee Asfaw, Daniel S. Edgar, David F. Crabb, David P. Am J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To assess accuracy and adherence of visual field (VF) home monitoring in a pilot sample of patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal feasibility and reliability study. METHODS: Twenty adults (median 71 years) with an established diagnosis of glaucoma were issued a tablet perimeter (Eyecatcher) and were asked to perform 1 VF home assessment per eye, per month, for 6 months (12 tests total). Before and after home monitoring, 2 VF assessments were performed in clinic using standard automated perimetry (4 tests total, per eye). RESULTS: All 20 participants could perform monthly home monitoring, though 1 participant stopped after 4 months (adherence: 98% of tests). There was good concordance between VFs measured at home and in the clinic (r = 0.94, P < .001). In 21 of 236 tests (9%), mean deviation deviated by more than ±3 dB from the median. Many of these anomalous tests could be identified by applying machine learning techniques to recordings from the tablets' front-facing camera (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.78). Adding home-monitoring data to 2 standard automated perimetry tests made 6 months apart reduced measurement error (between-test measurement variability) in 97% of eyes, with mean absolute error more than halving in 90% of eyes. Median test duration was 4.5 minutes (quartiles: 3.9-5.2 minutes). Substantial variations in ambient illumination had no observable effect on VF measurements (r = 0.07, P = .320). CONCLUSIONS: Home monitoring of VFs is viable for some patients and may provide clinically useful data. Elsevier Inc. 2021-03 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7462567/ /pubmed/32882222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.039 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jones, Pete R.
Campbell, Peter
Callaghan, Tamsin
Jones, Lee
Asfaw, Daniel S.
Edgar, David F.
Crabb, David P.
Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months
title Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months
title_full Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months
title_fullStr Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months
title_full_unstemmed Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months
title_short Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months
title_sort glaucoma home monitoring using a tablet-based visual field test (eyecatcher): an assessment of accuracy and adherence over 6 months
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.039
work_keys_str_mv AT jonespeter glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months
AT campbellpeter glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months
AT callaghantamsin glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months
AT joneslee glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months
AT asfawdaniels glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months
AT edgardavidf glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months
AT crabbdavidp glaucomahomemonitoringusingatabletbasedvisualfieldtesteyecatcheranassessmentofaccuracyandadherenceover6months