Cargando…

Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations()

One of the most concerning notions for science communicators, fact-checkers, and advocates of truth, is the backfire effect; this is when a correction leads to an individual increasing their belief in the very misconception the correction is aiming to rectify. There is currently a debate in the lite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swire-Thompson, Briony, DeGutis, Joseph, Lazer, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.006
_version_ 1783576989243801600
author Swire-Thompson, Briony
DeGutis, Joseph
Lazer, David
author_facet Swire-Thompson, Briony
DeGutis, Joseph
Lazer, David
author_sort Swire-Thompson, Briony
collection PubMed
description One of the most concerning notions for science communicators, fact-checkers, and advocates of truth, is the backfire effect; this is when a correction leads to an individual increasing their belief in the very misconception the correction is aiming to rectify. There is currently a debate in the literature as to whether backfire effects exist at all, as recent studies have failed to find the phenomenon, even under theoretically favorable conditions. In this review, we summarize the current state of the worldview and familiarity backfire effect literatures. We subsequently examine barriers to measuring the backfire phenomenon, discuss approaches to improving measurement and design, and conclude with recommendations for fact-checkers. We suggest that backfire effects are not a robust empirical phenomenon, and more reliable measures, powerful designs, and stronger links between experimental design and theory could greatly help move the field ahead.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7462781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74627812020-09-02 Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations() Swire-Thompson, Briony DeGutis, Joseph Lazer, David J Appl Res Mem Cogn Review One of the most concerning notions for science communicators, fact-checkers, and advocates of truth, is the backfire effect; this is when a correction leads to an individual increasing their belief in the very misconception the correction is aiming to rectify. There is currently a debate in the literature as to whether backfire effects exist at all, as recent studies have failed to find the phenomenon, even under theoretically favorable conditions. In this review, we summarize the current state of the worldview and familiarity backfire effect literatures. We subsequently examine barriers to measuring the backfire phenomenon, discuss approaches to improving measurement and design, and conclude with recommendations for fact-checkers. We suggest that backfire effects are not a robust empirical phenomenon, and more reliable measures, powerful designs, and stronger links between experimental design and theory could greatly help move the field ahead. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2020-09 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7462781/ /pubmed/32905023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.006 Text en © 2020 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Swire-Thompson, Briony
DeGutis, Joseph
Lazer, David
Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations()
title Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations()
title_full Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations()
title_fullStr Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations()
title_full_unstemmed Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations()
title_short Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations()
title_sort searching for the backfire effect: measurement and design considerations()
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.006
work_keys_str_mv AT swirethompsonbriony searchingforthebackfireeffectmeasurementanddesignconsiderations
AT degutisjoseph searchingforthebackfireeffectmeasurementanddesignconsiderations
AT lazerdavid searchingforthebackfireeffectmeasurementanddesignconsiderations