Cargando…

Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education

PURPOSE: Telemedicine was rapidly and ubiquitously adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are growing discussions as to its role postpandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We surveyed patients, radiation oncology (RO) attendings, and RO residents to assess their experience with telemedicine....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutkin, Paulina M., Prionas, Nicolas D., Minneci, Madeline O., Allen, Elena, Balazy, Katy E., Rahimy, Elham, Chang, Daniel T., Horst, Kathleen C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32890524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.047
_version_ 1783576992021479424
author Gutkin, Paulina M.
Prionas, Nicolas D.
Minneci, Madeline O.
Allen, Elena
Balazy, Katy E.
Rahimy, Elham
Chang, Daniel T.
Horst, Kathleen C.
author_facet Gutkin, Paulina M.
Prionas, Nicolas D.
Minneci, Madeline O.
Allen, Elena
Balazy, Katy E.
Rahimy, Elham
Chang, Daniel T.
Horst, Kathleen C.
author_sort Gutkin, Paulina M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Telemedicine was rapidly and ubiquitously adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are growing discussions as to its role postpandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We surveyed patients, radiation oncology (RO) attendings, and RO residents to assess their experience with telemedicine. Surveys addressed quality of patient care and utility of telemedicine for teaching and learning core competencies. Satisfaction was rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale. The quality of teaching and learning was graded on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with overall scores calculated by the average rating of each core competency required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (range, 1-5). RESULTS: Responses were collected from 56 patients, 12 RO attendings, and 13 RO residents. Patient feedback was collected at 17 new-patient, 22 on-treatment, and 17 follow-up video visits. Overall, 88% of patients were satisfied with virtual visits. A lower proportion of on-treatment patients rated their virtual visit as “very satisfactory” (68.2% vs 76.5% for new patients and 82.4% for follow-ups). Only 5.9% of the new patients and none of the follow-up patients were dissatisfied, and 27% of on-treatment patients were dissatisfied. The large majority of patients (88%) indicated that they would continue to use virtual visits as long as a physical examination was not needed. Overall scores for medical training were 4.1 out of 5 (range, 2.8-5.0) by RO residents and 3.2 (range, 2.0-4.0) by RO attendings. All residents and 92% of attendings indicated they would use telemedicine again; however, most indicated that telemedicine is best for follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is a convenient means of delivering care to patients, with some limitations demonstrated for on-treatment patients. The majority of both patients and providers are interested in using telemedicine again, and it will likely continue to supplement patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7462793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74627932020-09-02 Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education Gutkin, Paulina M. Prionas, Nicolas D. Minneci, Madeline O. Allen, Elena Balazy, Katy E. Rahimy, Elham Chang, Daniel T. Horst, Kathleen C. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Telemedicine PURPOSE: Telemedicine was rapidly and ubiquitously adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are growing discussions as to its role postpandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We surveyed patients, radiation oncology (RO) attendings, and RO residents to assess their experience with telemedicine. Surveys addressed quality of patient care and utility of telemedicine for teaching and learning core competencies. Satisfaction was rated on a 6-point Likert-type scale. The quality of teaching and learning was graded on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with overall scores calculated by the average rating of each core competency required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (range, 1-5). RESULTS: Responses were collected from 56 patients, 12 RO attendings, and 13 RO residents. Patient feedback was collected at 17 new-patient, 22 on-treatment, and 17 follow-up video visits. Overall, 88% of patients were satisfied with virtual visits. A lower proportion of on-treatment patients rated their virtual visit as “very satisfactory” (68.2% vs 76.5% for new patients and 82.4% for follow-ups). Only 5.9% of the new patients and none of the follow-up patients were dissatisfied, and 27% of on-treatment patients were dissatisfied. The large majority of patients (88%) indicated that they would continue to use virtual visits as long as a physical examination was not needed. Overall scores for medical training were 4.1 out of 5 (range, 2.8-5.0) by RO residents and 3.2 (range, 2.0-4.0) by RO attendings. All residents and 92% of attendings indicated they would use telemedicine again; however, most indicated that telemedicine is best for follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is a convenient means of delivering care to patients, with some limitations demonstrated for on-treatment patients. The majority of both patients and providers are interested in using telemedicine again, and it will likely continue to supplement patient care. Elsevier Inc. 2020-10-01 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7462793/ /pubmed/32890524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.047 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Telemedicine
Gutkin, Paulina M.
Prionas, Nicolas D.
Minneci, Madeline O.
Allen, Elena
Balazy, Katy E.
Rahimy, Elham
Chang, Daniel T.
Horst, Kathleen C.
Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education
title Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education
title_full Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education
title_fullStr Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education
title_short Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education
title_sort telemedicine in radiation oncology: is it here to stay? impacts on patient care and resident education
topic Telemedicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32890524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.047
work_keys_str_mv AT gutkinpaulinam telemedicineinradiationoncologyisitheretostayimpactsonpatientcareandresidenteducation
AT prionasnicolasd telemedicineinradiationoncologyisitheretostayimpactsonpatientcareandresidenteducation
AT minnecimadelineo telemedicineinradiationoncologyisitheretostayimpactsonpatientcareandresidenteducation
AT allenelena telemedicineinradiationoncologyisitheretostayimpactsonpatientcareandresidenteducation
AT balazykatye telemedicineinradiationoncologyisitheretostayimpactsonpatientcareandresidenteducation
AT rahimyelham telemedicineinradiationoncologyisitheretostayimpactsonpatientcareandresidenteducation
AT changdanielt telemedicineinradiationoncologyisitheretostayimpactsonpatientcareandresidenteducation
AT horstkathleenc telemedicineinradiationoncologyisitheretostayimpactsonpatientcareandresidenteducation