Cargando…

Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience

BACKGROUND: The scalp is an important functional and aesthetic structure that protects the cranial bone. Due to its inelastic characteristics, soft-tissue defects of the scalp make reconstruction surgery difficult. This study aims to provide an improved scalp reconstruction decision making algorithm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Hyeon Uk, Choi, Young Woong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867413
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00269
_version_ 1783577063243907072
author Jang, Hyeon Uk
Choi, Young Woong
author_facet Jang, Hyeon Uk
Choi, Young Woong
author_sort Jang, Hyeon Uk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The scalp is an important functional and aesthetic structure that protects the cranial bone. Due to its inelastic characteristics, soft-tissue defects of the scalp make reconstruction surgery difficult. This study aims to provide an improved scalp reconstruction decision making algorithm for surgeons. METHODS: This study examined patients who underwent scalp reconstruction within the last 10 years. The study evaluated several factors that surgeons use to select a given reconstruction method such as etiology, defect location, size, depth, and complications. An algorithmic approach was then suggested based on an analysis of these factors. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were selected in total and 98 cases, including revision surgery, were performed for scalp reconstruction. Scalp reconstruction was performed by primary closure (36.73%), skin graft (27.55%), local flap (17.34%), pedicled regional flap (15.30%), and free flap (3.06%). The ratio of primary closure to more complex procedure on loose scalps (51.11%) was significantly higher than on tight scalps (24.52%) (p= 0.011). The choice of scalp reconstruction method was affected significantly by the defect size (R = 0.479, p< 0.001) and depth (p< 0.001). There were five major complications which were three cases of flap necrosis and two cases of skin necrosis. Hematoma was the most common of the 29 minor complications reported, followed by skin necrosis. CONCLUSION: There are multiple factors affecting the choice of scalp reconstruction method. We suggest an algorithm based on 10 years of experience that will help surgeons establish successful surgical management for their patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7463122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74631222020-09-09 Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience Jang, Hyeon Uk Choi, Young Woong Arch Craniofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The scalp is an important functional and aesthetic structure that protects the cranial bone. Due to its inelastic characteristics, soft-tissue defects of the scalp make reconstruction surgery difficult. This study aims to provide an improved scalp reconstruction decision making algorithm for surgeons. METHODS: This study examined patients who underwent scalp reconstruction within the last 10 years. The study evaluated several factors that surgeons use to select a given reconstruction method such as etiology, defect location, size, depth, and complications. An algorithmic approach was then suggested based on an analysis of these factors. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were selected in total and 98 cases, including revision surgery, were performed for scalp reconstruction. Scalp reconstruction was performed by primary closure (36.73%), skin graft (27.55%), local flap (17.34%), pedicled regional flap (15.30%), and free flap (3.06%). The ratio of primary closure to more complex procedure on loose scalps (51.11%) was significantly higher than on tight scalps (24.52%) (p= 0.011). The choice of scalp reconstruction method was affected significantly by the defect size (R = 0.479, p< 0.001) and depth (p< 0.001). There were five major complications which were three cases of flap necrosis and two cases of skin necrosis. Hematoma was the most common of the 29 minor complications reported, followed by skin necrosis. CONCLUSION: There are multiple factors affecting the choice of scalp reconstruction method. We suggest an algorithm based on 10 years of experience that will help surgeons establish successful surgical management for their patients. Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2020-08 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7463122/ /pubmed/32867413 http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00269 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jang, Hyeon Uk
Choi, Young Woong
Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience
title Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience
title_full Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience
title_fullStr Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience
title_full_unstemmed Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience
title_short Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience
title_sort scalp reconstruction: a 10-year experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32867413
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00269
work_keys_str_mv AT janghyeonuk scalpreconstructiona10yearexperience
AT choiyoungwoong scalpreconstructiona10yearexperience