Cargando…

Evaluating the probability of CRISPR‐based gene drive contaminating another species

The probability D that a given clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)‐based gene drive element contaminates another, nontarget species can be estimated by the following Drive Risk Assessment Quantitative Estimate (DRAQUE) Equation: [Formula: see text] with hyb = probabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Courtier‐Orgogozo, Virginie, Danchin, Antoine, Gouyon, Pierre‐Henri, Boëte, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12939
_version_ 1783577109295267840
author Courtier‐Orgogozo, Virginie
Danchin, Antoine
Gouyon, Pierre‐Henri
Boëte, Christophe
author_facet Courtier‐Orgogozo, Virginie
Danchin, Antoine
Gouyon, Pierre‐Henri
Boëte, Christophe
author_sort Courtier‐Orgogozo, Virginie
collection PubMed
description The probability D that a given clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)‐based gene drive element contaminates another, nontarget species can be estimated by the following Drive Risk Assessment Quantitative Estimate (DRAQUE) Equation: [Formula: see text] with hyb = probability of hybridization between the target species and a nontarget species; transf = probability of horizontal transfer of a piece of DNA containing the gene drive cassette from the target species to a nontarget species (with no hybridization); express = probability that the Cas9 and guide RNA genes are expressed; cut = probability that the CRISPR‐guide RNA recognizes and cuts at a DNA site in the new host; flank = probability that the gene drive cassette inserts at the cut site; immune = probability that the immune system does not reject Cas9‐expressing cells; nonextinct = probability of invasion of the drive within the population. We discuss and estimate each of the seven parameters of the equation, with particular emphasis on possible transfers within insects, and between rodents and humans. We conclude from current data that the probability of a gene drive cassette to contaminate another species is not insignificant. We propose strategies to reduce this risk and call for more work on estimating all the parameters of the formula.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7463340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74633402020-09-08 Evaluating the probability of CRISPR‐based gene drive contaminating another species Courtier‐Orgogozo, Virginie Danchin, Antoine Gouyon, Pierre‐Henri Boëte, Christophe Evol Appl Original Articles The probability D that a given clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)‐based gene drive element contaminates another, nontarget species can be estimated by the following Drive Risk Assessment Quantitative Estimate (DRAQUE) Equation: [Formula: see text] with hyb = probability of hybridization between the target species and a nontarget species; transf = probability of horizontal transfer of a piece of DNA containing the gene drive cassette from the target species to a nontarget species (with no hybridization); express = probability that the Cas9 and guide RNA genes are expressed; cut = probability that the CRISPR‐guide RNA recognizes and cuts at a DNA site in the new host; flank = probability that the gene drive cassette inserts at the cut site; immune = probability that the immune system does not reject Cas9‐expressing cells; nonextinct = probability of invasion of the drive within the population. We discuss and estimate each of the seven parameters of the equation, with particular emphasis on possible transfers within insects, and between rodents and humans. We conclude from current data that the probability of a gene drive cassette to contaminate another species is not insignificant. We propose strategies to reduce this risk and call for more work on estimating all the parameters of the formula. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7463340/ /pubmed/32908593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12939 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Courtier‐Orgogozo, Virginie
Danchin, Antoine
Gouyon, Pierre‐Henri
Boëte, Christophe
Evaluating the probability of CRISPR‐based gene drive contaminating another species
title Evaluating the probability of CRISPR‐based gene drive contaminating another species
title_full Evaluating the probability of CRISPR‐based gene drive contaminating another species
title_fullStr Evaluating the probability of CRISPR‐based gene drive contaminating another species
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the probability of CRISPR‐based gene drive contaminating another species
title_short Evaluating the probability of CRISPR‐based gene drive contaminating another species
title_sort evaluating the probability of crispr‐based gene drive contaminating another species
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12939
work_keys_str_mv AT courtierorgogozovirginie evaluatingtheprobabilityofcrisprbasedgenedrivecontaminatinganotherspecies
AT danchinantoine evaluatingtheprobabilityofcrisprbasedgenedrivecontaminatinganotherspecies
AT gouyonpierrehenri evaluatingtheprobabilityofcrisprbasedgenedrivecontaminatinganotherspecies
AT boetechristophe evaluatingtheprobabilityofcrisprbasedgenedrivecontaminatinganotherspecies