Cargando…
Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare morphological and functional outcomes between vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in highly myopic eyes with macular hole- (MH-) induced retinal de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2374650 |
_version_ | 1783577113956188160 |
---|---|
author | Ling, Ling Liu, Yao Zhou, Baixing Gao, Feifei Hu, Zhe Tian, Man Xing, Yiqiao Ji, Kaibao Sun, Tao Zhou, Wentian |
author_facet | Ling, Ling Liu, Yao Zhou, Baixing Gao, Feifei Hu, Zhe Tian, Man Xing, Yiqiao Ji, Kaibao Sun, Tao Zhou, Wentian |
author_sort | Ling, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare morphological and functional outcomes between vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in highly myopic eyes with macular hole- (MH-) induced retinal detachment (MHRD). METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 10, 2019, for published studies comparing the two techniques for the treatment of MHRD. The outcomes in the collected articles included the postoperative MH closure rate, retinal reattachment rate, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Review Manager (version 5.3) was used for analyses. RESULTS: In total, seven retrospective studies comparing the inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for the treatment of MHRD were included. The MH closure rate was significantly higher in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 6 and 12 months after initial surgery (OR = 15.39; 95% CI: 6.68 to 35.43;P < 0.00001 and OR = 12.58, 95% CI: 3.51 to 45.08; P=0.0001), while the retinal reattachment rate was similar in both groups at 6 months after initial surgery (OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.89 to 6.50; P=0.08). Besides, the postoperative BCVA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 12 months after initial surgery (MD = −0.35; 95% CI: −0.52 to −0.18; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the MH closure rate and postoperative BCVA may be better with the inverted ILM flap technique than with ILM peeling for myopic MHRD, while the postoperative retinal reattachment rate appears to be similar with both techniques. Therefore, in the future, vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique should be preferred over standard ILM peeling technique for the treatment of MHRD in highly myopic eyes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7463360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74633602020-09-08 Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis Ling, Ling Liu, Yao Zhou, Baixing Gao, Feifei Hu, Zhe Tian, Man Xing, Yiqiao Ji, Kaibao Sun, Tao Zhou, Wentian J Ophthalmol Review Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare morphological and functional outcomes between vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in highly myopic eyes with macular hole- (MH-) induced retinal detachment (MHRD). METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 10, 2019, for published studies comparing the two techniques for the treatment of MHRD. The outcomes in the collected articles included the postoperative MH closure rate, retinal reattachment rate, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Review Manager (version 5.3) was used for analyses. RESULTS: In total, seven retrospective studies comparing the inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for the treatment of MHRD were included. The MH closure rate was significantly higher in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 6 and 12 months after initial surgery (OR = 15.39; 95% CI: 6.68 to 35.43;P < 0.00001 and OR = 12.58, 95% CI: 3.51 to 45.08; P=0.0001), while the retinal reattachment rate was similar in both groups at 6 months after initial surgery (OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.89 to 6.50; P=0.08). Besides, the postoperative BCVA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 12 months after initial surgery (MD = −0.35; 95% CI: −0.52 to −0.18; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the MH closure rate and postoperative BCVA may be better with the inverted ILM flap technique than with ILM peeling for myopic MHRD, while the postoperative retinal reattachment rate appears to be similar with both techniques. Therefore, in the future, vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique should be preferred over standard ILM peeling technique for the treatment of MHRD in highly myopic eyes. Hindawi 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7463360/ /pubmed/32908680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2374650 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ling Ling et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ling, Ling Liu, Yao Zhou, Baixing Gao, Feifei Hu, Zhe Tian, Man Xing, Yiqiao Ji, Kaibao Sun, Tao Zhou, Wentian Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title | Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus internal limiting membrane peeling for vitrectomy in highly myopic eyes with macular hole-induced retinal detachment: an updated meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2374650 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lingling invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis AT liuyao invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis AT zhoubaixing invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis AT gaofeifei invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis AT huzhe invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis AT tianman invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis AT xingyiqiao invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis AT jikaibao invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis AT suntao invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis AT zhouwentian invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis |