Cargando…

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare morphological and functional outcomes between vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in highly myopic eyes with macular hole- (MH-) induced retinal de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ling, Ling, Liu, Yao, Zhou, Baixing, Gao, Feifei, Hu, Zhe, Tian, Man, Xing, Yiqiao, Ji, Kaibao, Sun, Tao, Zhou, Wentian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2374650
_version_ 1783577113956188160
author Ling, Ling
Liu, Yao
Zhou, Baixing
Gao, Feifei
Hu, Zhe
Tian, Man
Xing, Yiqiao
Ji, Kaibao
Sun, Tao
Zhou, Wentian
author_facet Ling, Ling
Liu, Yao
Zhou, Baixing
Gao, Feifei
Hu, Zhe
Tian, Man
Xing, Yiqiao
Ji, Kaibao
Sun, Tao
Zhou, Wentian
author_sort Ling, Ling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare morphological and functional outcomes between vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in highly myopic eyes with macular hole- (MH-) induced retinal detachment (MHRD). METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 10, 2019, for published studies comparing the two techniques for the treatment of MHRD. The outcomes in the collected articles included the postoperative MH closure rate, retinal reattachment rate, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Review Manager (version 5.3) was used for analyses. RESULTS: In total, seven retrospective studies comparing the inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for the treatment of MHRD were included. The MH closure rate was significantly higher in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 6 and 12 months after initial surgery (OR = 15.39; 95% CI: 6.68 to 35.43;P < 0.00001 and OR = 12.58, 95% CI: 3.51 to 45.08; P=0.0001), while the retinal reattachment rate was similar in both groups at 6 months after initial surgery (OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.89 to 6.50; P=0.08). Besides, the postoperative BCVA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 12 months after initial surgery (MD = −0.35; 95% CI: −0.52 to −0.18; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the MH closure rate and postoperative BCVA may be better with the inverted ILM flap technique than with ILM peeling for myopic MHRD, while the postoperative retinal reattachment rate appears to be similar with both techniques. Therefore, in the future, vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique should be preferred over standard ILM peeling technique for the treatment of MHRD in highly myopic eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7463360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74633602020-09-08 Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis Ling, Ling Liu, Yao Zhou, Baixing Gao, Feifei Hu, Zhe Tian, Man Xing, Yiqiao Ji, Kaibao Sun, Tao Zhou, Wentian J Ophthalmol Review Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare morphological and functional outcomes between vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in highly myopic eyes with macular hole- (MH-) induced retinal detachment (MHRD). METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 10, 2019, for published studies comparing the two techniques for the treatment of MHRD. The outcomes in the collected articles included the postoperative MH closure rate, retinal reattachment rate, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Review Manager (version 5.3) was used for analyses. RESULTS: In total, seven retrospective studies comparing the inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for the treatment of MHRD were included. The MH closure rate was significantly higher in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 6 and 12 months after initial surgery (OR = 15.39; 95% CI: 6.68 to 35.43;P < 0.00001 and OR = 12.58, 95% CI: 3.51 to 45.08; P=0.0001), while the retinal reattachment rate was similar in both groups at 6 months after initial surgery (OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.89 to 6.50; P=0.08). Besides, the postoperative BCVA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 12 months after initial surgery (MD = −0.35; 95% CI: −0.52 to −0.18; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the MH closure rate and postoperative BCVA may be better with the inverted ILM flap technique than with ILM peeling for myopic MHRD, while the postoperative retinal reattachment rate appears to be similar with both techniques. Therefore, in the future, vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique should be preferred over standard ILM peeling technique for the treatment of MHRD in highly myopic eyes. Hindawi 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7463360/ /pubmed/32908680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2374650 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ling Ling et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ling, Ling
Liu, Yao
Zhou, Baixing
Gao, Feifei
Hu, Zhe
Tian, Man
Xing, Yiqiao
Ji, Kaibao
Sun, Tao
Zhou, Wentian
Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_full Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_short Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_sort inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus internal limiting membrane peeling for vitrectomy in highly myopic eyes with macular hole-induced retinal detachment: an updated meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2374650
work_keys_str_mv AT lingling invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT liuyao invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT zhoubaixing invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT gaofeifei invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT huzhe invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT tianman invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT xingyiqiao invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT jikaibao invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT suntao invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT zhouwentian invertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueversusinternallimitingmembranepeelingforvitrectomyinhighlymyopiceyeswithmacularholeinducedretinaldetachmentanupdatedmetaanalysis