Cargando…

Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners’ Views

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and often managed by general practitioners (GPs). GPs mostly prescribe medication and show low referral rates to psychotherapy. Many patients remain untreated. Blended psychotherapy (bPT) combines internet-based interventions with face-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Titzler, Ingrid, Berking, Matthias, Schlicker, Sandra, Riper, Heleen, Ebert, David Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32673213
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18642
_version_ 1783577125674024960
author Titzler, Ingrid
Berking, Matthias
Schlicker, Sandra
Riper, Heleen
Ebert, David Daniel
author_facet Titzler, Ingrid
Berking, Matthias
Schlicker, Sandra
Riper, Heleen
Ebert, David Daniel
author_sort Titzler, Ingrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and often managed by general practitioners (GPs). GPs mostly prescribe medication and show low referral rates to psychotherapy. Many patients remain untreated. Blended psychotherapy (bPT) combines internet-based interventions with face-to-face psychotherapy and could increase treatment access and availability. Effectively implementing bPT in routine care requires an understanding of professional users’ perspectives and behavior. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators perceived by GPs in referring patients to bPT. Explanations for variations in referral rates were examined. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 of 110 GPs participating in a German randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate barriers to and facilitators for referrals to bPT for MDD (10 web-based modules, app-based assessments, and 6 face-to-face sessions). The interview guide was based on the theoretical domains framework. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the qualitative content was analyzed by 2 independent coders (intercoder agreement, k=0.71). A follow-up survey with 12 interviewed GPs enabled the validation of emergent themes. The differences in the barriers and facilitators identified between groups with different characteristics (eg, GPs with high or low referral rates) were described. Correlations between referrals and characteristics, self-rated competences, and experiences managing depression of the RCT-GPs (n=76) were conducted. RESULTS: GPs referred few patients to bPT, although varied in their referral rates, and interviewees referred more than twice as many patients as RCT-GPs (interview-GPs: mean 6.34, SD 9.42; RCT-GPs: mean 2.65, SD 3.92). A negative correlation was found between GPs’ referrals and their self-rated pharmacotherapeutic competence, r(73)=−0.31, P<.001. The qualitative findings revealed a total of 19 barriers (B) and 29 facilitators (F), at the levels of GP (B=4 and F=11), patient (B=11 and F=9), GP practice (B=1 and F=3), and sociopolitical circumstances (B=3 and F=6). Key barriers stated by all interviewed GPs included “little knowledge about internet-based interventions” and “patients’ lack of familiarity with technology/internet/media” (number of statements, each k=22). Key facilitators were “perceived patient suitability, e.g. well-educated, young” (k=22) and “no conflict with GP’s role” (k=16). The follow-up survey showed a very high agreement rate of at least 75% for 71% (34/48) of the identified themes. Descriptive findings indicated differences between GPs with low and high referral rates in terms of which and how many barriers (low: mean 9.75, SD 1.83; high: mean 10.50, SD 2.38) and facilitators (low: mean 18.25, SD 4.13; high: mean 21.00; SD 3.92) they mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into factors influencing GPs’ referrals to bPT as gatekeepers to depression care. Barriers and facilitators should be considered when designing implementation strategies to enhance referral rates. The findings should be interpreted with care because of the small and self-selected sample and low response rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7463410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74634102020-09-17 Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners’ Views Titzler, Ingrid Berking, Matthias Schlicker, Sandra Riper, Heleen Ebert, David Daniel JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and often managed by general practitioners (GPs). GPs mostly prescribe medication and show low referral rates to psychotherapy. Many patients remain untreated. Blended psychotherapy (bPT) combines internet-based interventions with face-to-face psychotherapy and could increase treatment access and availability. Effectively implementing bPT in routine care requires an understanding of professional users’ perspectives and behavior. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators perceived by GPs in referring patients to bPT. Explanations for variations in referral rates were examined. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 of 110 GPs participating in a German randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate barriers to and facilitators for referrals to bPT for MDD (10 web-based modules, app-based assessments, and 6 face-to-face sessions). The interview guide was based on the theoretical domains framework. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the qualitative content was analyzed by 2 independent coders (intercoder agreement, k=0.71). A follow-up survey with 12 interviewed GPs enabled the validation of emergent themes. The differences in the barriers and facilitators identified between groups with different characteristics (eg, GPs with high or low referral rates) were described. Correlations between referrals and characteristics, self-rated competences, and experiences managing depression of the RCT-GPs (n=76) were conducted. RESULTS: GPs referred few patients to bPT, although varied in their referral rates, and interviewees referred more than twice as many patients as RCT-GPs (interview-GPs: mean 6.34, SD 9.42; RCT-GPs: mean 2.65, SD 3.92). A negative correlation was found between GPs’ referrals and their self-rated pharmacotherapeutic competence, r(73)=−0.31, P<.001. The qualitative findings revealed a total of 19 barriers (B) and 29 facilitators (F), at the levels of GP (B=4 and F=11), patient (B=11 and F=9), GP practice (B=1 and F=3), and sociopolitical circumstances (B=3 and F=6). Key barriers stated by all interviewed GPs included “little knowledge about internet-based interventions” and “patients’ lack of familiarity with technology/internet/media” (number of statements, each k=22). Key facilitators were “perceived patient suitability, e.g. well-educated, young” (k=22) and “no conflict with GP’s role” (k=16). The follow-up survey showed a very high agreement rate of at least 75% for 71% (34/48) of the identified themes. Descriptive findings indicated differences between GPs with low and high referral rates in terms of which and how many barriers (low: mean 9.75, SD 1.83; high: mean 10.50, SD 2.38) and facilitators (low: mean 18.25, SD 4.13; high: mean 21.00; SD 3.92) they mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into factors influencing GPs’ referrals to bPT as gatekeepers to depression care. Barriers and facilitators should be considered when designing implementation strategies to enhance referral rates. The findings should be interpreted with care because of the small and self-selected sample and low response rates. JMIR Publications 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7463410/ /pubmed/32673213 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18642 Text en ©Ingrid Titzler, Matthias Berking, Sandra Schlicker, Heleen Riper, David Daniel Ebert. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 18.08.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Titzler, Ingrid
Berking, Matthias
Schlicker, Sandra
Riper, Heleen
Ebert, David Daniel
Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners’ Views
title Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners’ Views
title_full Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners’ Views
title_fullStr Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners’ Views
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners’ Views
title_short Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners’ Views
title_sort barriers and facilitators for referrals of primary care patients to blended internet-based psychotherapy for depression: mixed methods study of general practitioners’ views
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32673213
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18642
work_keys_str_mv AT titzleringrid barriersandfacilitatorsforreferralsofprimarycarepatientstoblendedinternetbasedpsychotherapyfordepressionmixedmethodsstudyofgeneralpractitionersviews
AT berkingmatthias barriersandfacilitatorsforreferralsofprimarycarepatientstoblendedinternetbasedpsychotherapyfordepressionmixedmethodsstudyofgeneralpractitionersviews
AT schlickersandra barriersandfacilitatorsforreferralsofprimarycarepatientstoblendedinternetbasedpsychotherapyfordepressionmixedmethodsstudyofgeneralpractitionersviews
AT riperheleen barriersandfacilitatorsforreferralsofprimarycarepatientstoblendedinternetbasedpsychotherapyfordepressionmixedmethodsstudyofgeneralpractitionersviews
AT ebertdaviddaniel barriersandfacilitatorsforreferralsofprimarycarepatientstoblendedinternetbasedpsychotherapyfordepressionmixedmethodsstudyofgeneralpractitionersviews