Cargando…

Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection

Cervical epidural injection (CEI), which is widely used for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, sometimes has been associated with post-operative complications. Recently, EPI-Detection(TM), which detects the negative pressure of the epidural space and notifies the proceduralist by flashing a li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Jiin, Park, Sam Sun, Kim, Chul Hwan, Kim, Eui Chul, Kim, Hyung Cheol, Jeon, Hyungseok, Kim, Kyung Hyun, Shin, Dong Ah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717941
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082355
_version_ 1783577206695395328
author Kang, Jiin
Park, Sam Sun
Kim, Chul Hwan
Kim, Eui Chul
Kim, Hyung Cheol
Jeon, Hyungseok
Kim, Kyung Hyun
Shin, Dong Ah
author_facet Kang, Jiin
Park, Sam Sun
Kim, Chul Hwan
Kim, Eui Chul
Kim, Hyung Cheol
Jeon, Hyungseok
Kim, Kyung Hyun
Shin, Dong Ah
author_sort Kang, Jiin
collection PubMed
description Cervical epidural injection (CEI), which is widely used for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, sometimes has been associated with post-operative complications. Recently, EPI-Detection(TM), which detects the negative pressure of the epidural space and notifies the proceduralist by flashing a light and producing a beeping sound, was introduced. We assumed that the newly developed device could be as safe and efficient as the conventional loss of resistance (LOR) method. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EPI-Detection(TM) and compare it to that of the conventional LOR method. We randomly assigned 57 patients to the LOR and EPI-Detection groups (29 and 28 patients, respectively). Subjects were treated with interlaminar CEI (ILCEI) using one of two methods. The measured parameters, i.e., operation time and radiation dose were lower in the EPI-Detection(TM) group (4.6 ± 1.2 min vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 min; and 223.2 ± 206.7 mGy·cm(2) vs. 380.3 ± 340.9 mGy·cm(2), respectively; all p < 0.05) than in the LOR group. There were no complications noted in either group. Both the EPI-Detection(TM) and LOR methods were safe and effective in detecting the epidural space, but the former was superior to the latter in terms of operation time and radiation exposure. The EPI-Detection(TM) may help perform ILCEI safely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7463758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74637582020-09-02 Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection Kang, Jiin Park, Sam Sun Kim, Chul Hwan Kim, Eui Chul Kim, Hyung Cheol Jeon, Hyungseok Kim, Kyung Hyun Shin, Dong Ah J Clin Med Article Cervical epidural injection (CEI), which is widely used for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, sometimes has been associated with post-operative complications. Recently, EPI-Detection(TM), which detects the negative pressure of the epidural space and notifies the proceduralist by flashing a light and producing a beeping sound, was introduced. We assumed that the newly developed device could be as safe and efficient as the conventional loss of resistance (LOR) method. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EPI-Detection(TM) and compare it to that of the conventional LOR method. We randomly assigned 57 patients to the LOR and EPI-Detection groups (29 and 28 patients, respectively). Subjects were treated with interlaminar CEI (ILCEI) using one of two methods. The measured parameters, i.e., operation time and radiation dose were lower in the EPI-Detection(TM) group (4.6 ± 1.2 min vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 min; and 223.2 ± 206.7 mGy·cm(2) vs. 380.3 ± 340.9 mGy·cm(2), respectively; all p < 0.05) than in the LOR group. There were no complications noted in either group. Both the EPI-Detection(TM) and LOR methods were safe and effective in detecting the epidural space, but the former was superior to the latter in terms of operation time and radiation exposure. The EPI-Detection(TM) may help perform ILCEI safely. MDPI 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7463758/ /pubmed/32717941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082355 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kang, Jiin
Park, Sam Sun
Kim, Chul Hwan
Kim, Eui Chul
Kim, Hyung Cheol
Jeon, Hyungseok
Kim, Kyung Hyun
Shin, Dong Ah
Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection
title Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection
title_full Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection
title_fullStr Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection
title_short Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection
title_sort feasibility of using the epidural space detecting device (epi-detection(tm)) for interlaminar cervical epidural injection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717941
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082355
work_keys_str_mv AT kangjiin feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection
AT parksamsun feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection
AT kimchulhwan feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection
AT kimeuichul feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection
AT kimhyungcheol feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection
AT jeonhyungseok feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection
AT kimkyunghyun feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection
AT shindongah feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection