Cargando…
Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection
Cervical epidural injection (CEI), which is widely used for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, sometimes has been associated with post-operative complications. Recently, EPI-Detection(TM), which detects the negative pressure of the epidural space and notifies the proceduralist by flashing a li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082355 |
_version_ | 1783577206695395328 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Jiin Park, Sam Sun Kim, Chul Hwan Kim, Eui Chul Kim, Hyung Cheol Jeon, Hyungseok Kim, Kyung Hyun Shin, Dong Ah |
author_facet | Kang, Jiin Park, Sam Sun Kim, Chul Hwan Kim, Eui Chul Kim, Hyung Cheol Jeon, Hyungseok Kim, Kyung Hyun Shin, Dong Ah |
author_sort | Kang, Jiin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cervical epidural injection (CEI), which is widely used for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, sometimes has been associated with post-operative complications. Recently, EPI-Detection(TM), which detects the negative pressure of the epidural space and notifies the proceduralist by flashing a light and producing a beeping sound, was introduced. We assumed that the newly developed device could be as safe and efficient as the conventional loss of resistance (LOR) method. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EPI-Detection(TM) and compare it to that of the conventional LOR method. We randomly assigned 57 patients to the LOR and EPI-Detection groups (29 and 28 patients, respectively). Subjects were treated with interlaminar CEI (ILCEI) using one of two methods. The measured parameters, i.e., operation time and radiation dose were lower in the EPI-Detection(TM) group (4.6 ± 1.2 min vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 min; and 223.2 ± 206.7 mGy·cm(2) vs. 380.3 ± 340.9 mGy·cm(2), respectively; all p < 0.05) than in the LOR group. There were no complications noted in either group. Both the EPI-Detection(TM) and LOR methods were safe and effective in detecting the epidural space, but the former was superior to the latter in terms of operation time and radiation exposure. The EPI-Detection(TM) may help perform ILCEI safely. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7463758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74637582020-09-02 Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection Kang, Jiin Park, Sam Sun Kim, Chul Hwan Kim, Eui Chul Kim, Hyung Cheol Jeon, Hyungseok Kim, Kyung Hyun Shin, Dong Ah J Clin Med Article Cervical epidural injection (CEI), which is widely used for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, sometimes has been associated with post-operative complications. Recently, EPI-Detection(TM), which detects the negative pressure of the epidural space and notifies the proceduralist by flashing a light and producing a beeping sound, was introduced. We assumed that the newly developed device could be as safe and efficient as the conventional loss of resistance (LOR) method. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EPI-Detection(TM) and compare it to that of the conventional LOR method. We randomly assigned 57 patients to the LOR and EPI-Detection groups (29 and 28 patients, respectively). Subjects were treated with interlaminar CEI (ILCEI) using one of two methods. The measured parameters, i.e., operation time and radiation dose were lower in the EPI-Detection(TM) group (4.6 ± 1.2 min vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 min; and 223.2 ± 206.7 mGy·cm(2) vs. 380.3 ± 340.9 mGy·cm(2), respectively; all p < 0.05) than in the LOR group. There were no complications noted in either group. Both the EPI-Detection(TM) and LOR methods were safe and effective in detecting the epidural space, but the former was superior to the latter in terms of operation time and radiation exposure. The EPI-Detection(TM) may help perform ILCEI safely. MDPI 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7463758/ /pubmed/32717941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082355 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kang, Jiin Park, Sam Sun Kim, Chul Hwan Kim, Eui Chul Kim, Hyung Cheol Jeon, Hyungseok Kim, Kyung Hyun Shin, Dong Ah Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection |
title | Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection |
title_full | Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection |
title_short | Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-Detection(TM)) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection |
title_sort | feasibility of using the epidural space detecting device (epi-detection(tm)) for interlaminar cervical epidural injection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082355 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangjiin feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection AT parksamsun feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection AT kimchulhwan feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection AT kimeuichul feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection AT kimhyungcheol feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection AT jeonhyungseok feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection AT kimkyunghyun feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection AT shindongah feasibilityofusingtheepiduralspacedetectingdeviceepidetectiontmforinterlaminarcervicalepiduralinjection |