Cargando…
How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer?
3D printed surgical guides are used for prosthetically-driven oral implant placement. When manufacturing these guides, information regarding suitable printing techniques and materials as well as the necessity for additional, non-printed stock parts such as metal sleeves is scarce. The aim of the inv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32707759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082322 |
_version_ | 1783577243133411328 |
---|---|
author | Pieralli, Stefano Spies, Benedikt Christopher Hromadnik, Valentin Nicic, Robert Beuer, Florian Wesemann, Christian |
author_facet | Pieralli, Stefano Spies, Benedikt Christopher Hromadnik, Valentin Nicic, Robert Beuer, Florian Wesemann, Christian |
author_sort | Pieralli, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | 3D printed surgical guides are used for prosthetically-driven oral implant placement. When manufacturing these guides, information regarding suitable printing techniques and materials as well as the necessity for additional, non-printed stock parts such as metal sleeves is scarce. The aim of the investigation was to determine the accuracy of a surgical workflow for oral implant placement using guides manufactured by means of fused deposition modeling (FDM) from a biodegradable and sterilizable biopolymer filament. Furthermore, the potential benefit of metal sleeve inserts should be assessed. A surgical guide was designed for the installation of two implants in the region of the second premolar (SP) and second molar (SM) in a mandibular typodont model. For two additive manufacturing techniques (stereolithography [SLA]: reference group, FDM: observational group) n = 10 surgical guides, with (S) and without (NS) metal sleeves, were used. This resulted in 4 groups of 10 samples each (SLA-S/NS, FDM-S/NS). Target and real implant positions were superimposed and compared using a dedicated software. Sagittal, transversal, and vertical discrepancies at the level of the implant shoulder, apex and regarding the main axis were determined. MANOVA with posthoc Tukey tests were performed for statistical analyses. Placed implants showed sagittal and transversal discrepancies of <1 mm, vertical discrepancies of <0.6 mm, and axial deviations of ≤3°. In the vertical dimension, no differences between the four groups were measured (p ≤ 0.054). In the sagittal dimension, SLA groups showed decreased deviations in the implant shoulder region compared to FDM (p ≤ 0.033), whereas no differences in the transversal dimension between the groups were measured (p ≤ 0.054). The use of metal sleeves did not affect axial, vertical, and sagittal accuracy, but resulted in increased transversal deviations (p = 0.001). Regarding accuracy, biopolymer-based surgical guides manufactured by means of FDM present similar accuracy than SLA. Cytotoxicity tests are necessary to confirm their biocompatibility in the oral environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7463912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74639122020-09-04 How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer? Pieralli, Stefano Spies, Benedikt Christopher Hromadnik, Valentin Nicic, Robert Beuer, Florian Wesemann, Christian J Clin Med Article 3D printed surgical guides are used for prosthetically-driven oral implant placement. When manufacturing these guides, information regarding suitable printing techniques and materials as well as the necessity for additional, non-printed stock parts such as metal sleeves is scarce. The aim of the investigation was to determine the accuracy of a surgical workflow for oral implant placement using guides manufactured by means of fused deposition modeling (FDM) from a biodegradable and sterilizable biopolymer filament. Furthermore, the potential benefit of metal sleeve inserts should be assessed. A surgical guide was designed for the installation of two implants in the region of the second premolar (SP) and second molar (SM) in a mandibular typodont model. For two additive manufacturing techniques (stereolithography [SLA]: reference group, FDM: observational group) n = 10 surgical guides, with (S) and without (NS) metal sleeves, were used. This resulted in 4 groups of 10 samples each (SLA-S/NS, FDM-S/NS). Target and real implant positions were superimposed and compared using a dedicated software. Sagittal, transversal, and vertical discrepancies at the level of the implant shoulder, apex and regarding the main axis were determined. MANOVA with posthoc Tukey tests were performed for statistical analyses. Placed implants showed sagittal and transversal discrepancies of <1 mm, vertical discrepancies of <0.6 mm, and axial deviations of ≤3°. In the vertical dimension, no differences between the four groups were measured (p ≤ 0.054). In the sagittal dimension, SLA groups showed decreased deviations in the implant shoulder region compared to FDM (p ≤ 0.033), whereas no differences in the transversal dimension between the groups were measured (p ≤ 0.054). The use of metal sleeves did not affect axial, vertical, and sagittal accuracy, but resulted in increased transversal deviations (p = 0.001). Regarding accuracy, biopolymer-based surgical guides manufactured by means of FDM present similar accuracy than SLA. Cytotoxicity tests are necessary to confirm their biocompatibility in the oral environment. MDPI 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7463912/ /pubmed/32707759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082322 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pieralli, Stefano Spies, Benedikt Christopher Hromadnik, Valentin Nicic, Robert Beuer, Florian Wesemann, Christian How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer? |
title | How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer? |
title_full | How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer? |
title_fullStr | How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer? |
title_short | How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer? |
title_sort | how accurate is oral implant installation using surgical guides printed from a degradable and steam-sterilized biopolymer? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7463912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32707759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pierallistefano howaccurateisoralimplantinstallationusingsurgicalguidesprintedfromadegradableandsteamsterilizedbiopolymer AT spiesbenediktchristopher howaccurateisoralimplantinstallationusingsurgicalguidesprintedfromadegradableandsteamsterilizedbiopolymer AT hromadnikvalentin howaccurateisoralimplantinstallationusingsurgicalguidesprintedfromadegradableandsteamsterilizedbiopolymer AT nicicrobert howaccurateisoralimplantinstallationusingsurgicalguidesprintedfromadegradableandsteamsterilizedbiopolymer AT beuerflorian howaccurateisoralimplantinstallationusingsurgicalguidesprintedfromadegradableandsteamsterilizedbiopolymer AT wesemannchristian howaccurateisoralimplantinstallationusingsurgicalguidesprintedfromadegradableandsteamsterilizedbiopolymer |