Cargando…
Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning
Clinical risk-scoring systems are important for identifying patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a high risk of hemodynamic instability. We developed an algorithm that predicts adverse events in patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB using machine learning (ML)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7464777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082603 |
_version_ | 1783577441444298752 |
---|---|
author | Seo, Dong-Woo Yi, Hahn Park, Beomhee Kim, Youn-Jung Jung, Dae Ho Woo, Ilsang Sohn, Chang Hwan Ko, Byuk Sung Kim, Namkug Kim, Won Young |
author_facet | Seo, Dong-Woo Yi, Hahn Park, Beomhee Kim, Youn-Jung Jung, Dae Ho Woo, Ilsang Sohn, Chang Hwan Ko, Byuk Sung Kim, Namkug Kim, Won Young |
author_sort | Seo, Dong-Woo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical risk-scoring systems are important for identifying patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a high risk of hemodynamic instability. We developed an algorithm that predicts adverse events in patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB using machine learning (ML). Using prospective observational registry, 1439 out of 3363 consecutive patients were enrolled. Primary outcomes included adverse events such as mortality, hypotension, and rebleeding within 7 days. Four machine learning algorithms, namely, logistic regression with regularization (LR), random forest classifier (RF), gradient boosting classifier (GB), and voting classifier (VC), were compared with the Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS) and Rockall scores. The RF model showed the highest accuracies and significant improvement over conventional methods for predicting mortality (area under the curve: RF 0.917 vs. GBS 0.710), but the performance of the VC model was best in hypotension (VC 0.757 vs. GBS 0.668) and rebleeding within 7 days (VC 0.733 vs. GBS 0.694). Clinically significant variables including blood urea nitrogen, albumin, hemoglobin, platelet, prothrombin time, age, and lactate were identified by the global feature importance analysis. These results suggest that ML models will be useful early predictive tools for identifying high-risk patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB admitted at an emergency department. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7464777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74647772020-09-04 Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning Seo, Dong-Woo Yi, Hahn Park, Beomhee Kim, Youn-Jung Jung, Dae Ho Woo, Ilsang Sohn, Chang Hwan Ko, Byuk Sung Kim, Namkug Kim, Won Young J Clin Med Article Clinical risk-scoring systems are important for identifying patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a high risk of hemodynamic instability. We developed an algorithm that predicts adverse events in patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB using machine learning (ML). Using prospective observational registry, 1439 out of 3363 consecutive patients were enrolled. Primary outcomes included adverse events such as mortality, hypotension, and rebleeding within 7 days. Four machine learning algorithms, namely, logistic regression with regularization (LR), random forest classifier (RF), gradient boosting classifier (GB), and voting classifier (VC), were compared with the Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS) and Rockall scores. The RF model showed the highest accuracies and significant improvement over conventional methods for predicting mortality (area under the curve: RF 0.917 vs. GBS 0.710), but the performance of the VC model was best in hypotension (VC 0.757 vs. GBS 0.668) and rebleeding within 7 days (VC 0.733 vs. GBS 0.694). Clinically significant variables including blood urea nitrogen, albumin, hemoglobin, platelet, prothrombin time, age, and lactate were identified by the global feature importance analysis. These results suggest that ML models will be useful early predictive tools for identifying high-risk patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB admitted at an emergency department. MDPI 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7464777/ /pubmed/32796647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082603 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Seo, Dong-Woo Yi, Hahn Park, Beomhee Kim, Youn-Jung Jung, Dae Ho Woo, Ilsang Sohn, Chang Hwan Ko, Byuk Sung Kim, Namkug Kim, Won Young Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning |
title | Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning |
title_full | Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning |
title_short | Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning |
title_sort | prediction of adverse events in stable non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding using machine learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7464777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seodongwoo predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning AT yihahn predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning AT parkbeomhee predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning AT kimyounjung predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning AT jungdaeho predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning AT wooilsang predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning AT sohnchanghwan predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning AT kobyuksung predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning AT kimnamkug predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning AT kimwonyoung predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning |