Cargando…

Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning

Clinical risk-scoring systems are important for identifying patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a high risk of hemodynamic instability. We developed an algorithm that predicts adverse events in patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB using machine learning (ML)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Dong-Woo, Yi, Hahn, Park, Beomhee, Kim, Youn-Jung, Jung, Dae Ho, Woo, Ilsang, Sohn, Chang Hwan, Ko, Byuk Sung, Kim, Namkug, Kim, Won Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7464777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082603
_version_ 1783577441444298752
author Seo, Dong-Woo
Yi, Hahn
Park, Beomhee
Kim, Youn-Jung
Jung, Dae Ho
Woo, Ilsang
Sohn, Chang Hwan
Ko, Byuk Sung
Kim, Namkug
Kim, Won Young
author_facet Seo, Dong-Woo
Yi, Hahn
Park, Beomhee
Kim, Youn-Jung
Jung, Dae Ho
Woo, Ilsang
Sohn, Chang Hwan
Ko, Byuk Sung
Kim, Namkug
Kim, Won Young
author_sort Seo, Dong-Woo
collection PubMed
description Clinical risk-scoring systems are important for identifying patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a high risk of hemodynamic instability. We developed an algorithm that predicts adverse events in patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB using machine learning (ML). Using prospective observational registry, 1439 out of 3363 consecutive patients were enrolled. Primary outcomes included adverse events such as mortality, hypotension, and rebleeding within 7 days. Four machine learning algorithms, namely, logistic regression with regularization (LR), random forest classifier (RF), gradient boosting classifier (GB), and voting classifier (VC), were compared with the Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS) and Rockall scores. The RF model showed the highest accuracies and significant improvement over conventional methods for predicting mortality (area under the curve: RF 0.917 vs. GBS 0.710), but the performance of the VC model was best in hypotension (VC 0.757 vs. GBS 0.668) and rebleeding within 7 days (VC 0.733 vs. GBS 0.694). Clinically significant variables including blood urea nitrogen, albumin, hemoglobin, platelet, prothrombin time, age, and lactate were identified by the global feature importance analysis. These results suggest that ML models will be useful early predictive tools for identifying high-risk patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB admitted at an emergency department.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7464777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74647772020-09-04 Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning Seo, Dong-Woo Yi, Hahn Park, Beomhee Kim, Youn-Jung Jung, Dae Ho Woo, Ilsang Sohn, Chang Hwan Ko, Byuk Sung Kim, Namkug Kim, Won Young J Clin Med Article Clinical risk-scoring systems are important for identifying patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a high risk of hemodynamic instability. We developed an algorithm that predicts adverse events in patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB using machine learning (ML). Using prospective observational registry, 1439 out of 3363 consecutive patients were enrolled. Primary outcomes included adverse events such as mortality, hypotension, and rebleeding within 7 days. Four machine learning algorithms, namely, logistic regression with regularization (LR), random forest classifier (RF), gradient boosting classifier (GB), and voting classifier (VC), were compared with the Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS) and Rockall scores. The RF model showed the highest accuracies and significant improvement over conventional methods for predicting mortality (area under the curve: RF 0.917 vs. GBS 0.710), but the performance of the VC model was best in hypotension (VC 0.757 vs. GBS 0.668) and rebleeding within 7 days (VC 0.733 vs. GBS 0.694). Clinically significant variables including blood urea nitrogen, albumin, hemoglobin, platelet, prothrombin time, age, and lactate were identified by the global feature importance analysis. These results suggest that ML models will be useful early predictive tools for identifying high-risk patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB admitted at an emergency department. MDPI 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7464777/ /pubmed/32796647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082603 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Seo, Dong-Woo
Yi, Hahn
Park, Beomhee
Kim, Youn-Jung
Jung, Dae Ho
Woo, Ilsang
Sohn, Chang Hwan
Ko, Byuk Sung
Kim, Namkug
Kim, Won Young
Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning
title Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning
title_full Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning
title_fullStr Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning
title_short Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning
title_sort prediction of adverse events in stable non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding using machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7464777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082603
work_keys_str_mv AT seodongwoo predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning
AT yihahn predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning
AT parkbeomhee predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning
AT kimyounjung predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning
AT jungdaeho predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning
AT wooilsang predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning
AT sohnchanghwan predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning
AT kobyuksung predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning
AT kimnamkug predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning
AT kimwonyoung predictionofadverseeventsinstablenonvaricealgastrointestinalbleedingusingmachinelearning