Cargando…

Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory

Healthy aging is associated with decline in the ability to maintain visual information in working memory (WM). We examined whether this decline can be explained by decreases in the ability to filter distraction during encoding or to ignore distraction during memory maintenance. Distraction consisted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maniglia, Mariana R., Souza, Alessandra S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7464792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10080556
_version_ 1783577444785061888
author Maniglia, Mariana R.
Souza, Alessandra S.
author_facet Maniglia, Mariana R.
Souza, Alessandra S.
author_sort Maniglia, Mariana R.
collection PubMed
description Healthy aging is associated with decline in the ability to maintain visual information in working memory (WM). We examined whether this decline can be explained by decreases in the ability to filter distraction during encoding or to ignore distraction during memory maintenance. Distraction consisted of irrelevant objects (Exp. 1) or irrelevant features of an object (Exp. 2). In Experiment 1, participants completed a spatial WM task requiring remembering locations on a grid. During encoding or during maintenance, irrelevant distractor positions were presented. In Experiment 2, participants encoded either single-feature (colors or orientations) or multifeature objects (colored triangles) and later reproduced one of these features using a continuous scale. In multifeature blocks, a precue appeared before encoding or a retrocue appeared during memory maintenance indicating with 100% certainty to the to-be-tested feature, thereby enabling filtering and ignoring of the irrelevant (not-cued) feature, respectively. There were no age-related deficits in the efficiency of filtering and ignoring distractor objects (Exp. 1) and of filtering irrelevant features (Exp. 2). Both younger and older adults could not ignore irrelevant features when cued with a retrocue. Overall, our results provide no evidence for an aging deficit in using attention to manage visual WM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7464792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74647922020-09-04 Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory Maniglia, Mariana R. Souza, Alessandra S. Brain Sci Article Healthy aging is associated with decline in the ability to maintain visual information in working memory (WM). We examined whether this decline can be explained by decreases in the ability to filter distraction during encoding or to ignore distraction during memory maintenance. Distraction consisted of irrelevant objects (Exp. 1) or irrelevant features of an object (Exp. 2). In Experiment 1, participants completed a spatial WM task requiring remembering locations on a grid. During encoding or during maintenance, irrelevant distractor positions were presented. In Experiment 2, participants encoded either single-feature (colors or orientations) or multifeature objects (colored triangles) and later reproduced one of these features using a continuous scale. In multifeature blocks, a precue appeared before encoding or a retrocue appeared during memory maintenance indicating with 100% certainty to the to-be-tested feature, thereby enabling filtering and ignoring of the irrelevant (not-cued) feature, respectively. There were no age-related deficits in the efficiency of filtering and ignoring distractor objects (Exp. 1) and of filtering irrelevant features (Exp. 2). Both younger and older adults could not ignore irrelevant features when cued with a retrocue. Overall, our results provide no evidence for an aging deficit in using attention to manage visual WM. MDPI 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7464792/ /pubmed/32824098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10080556 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Maniglia, Mariana R.
Souza, Alessandra S.
Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory
title Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory
title_full Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory
title_fullStr Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory
title_full_unstemmed Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory
title_short Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory
title_sort age differences in the efficiency of filtering and ignoring distraction in visual working memory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7464792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10080556
work_keys_str_mv AT manigliamarianar agedifferencesintheefficiencyoffilteringandignoringdistractioninvisualworkingmemory
AT souzaalessandras agedifferencesintheefficiencyoffilteringandignoringdistractioninvisualworkingmemory