Cargando…

In Vitro Evaluation of Enteric-Coated HPMC Capsules—Effect of Formulation Factors on Product Performance

A comparative study on different enteric-coated hard capsules was performed. The influence of different formulation factors like choice of enteric polymer, triethyl citrate (TEC) concentration (plasticizer), talc concentrations (anti-tacking agent), and different coating process parameters on the se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Maoqi, Blechar, Johannes Andreas, Sauer, Andreas, Al-Gousous, Jozef, Langguth, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12080696
_version_ 1783577503739150336
author Fu, Maoqi
Blechar, Johannes Andreas
Sauer, Andreas
Al-Gousous, Jozef
Langguth, Peter
author_facet Fu, Maoqi
Blechar, Johannes Andreas
Sauer, Andreas
Al-Gousous, Jozef
Langguth, Peter
author_sort Fu, Maoqi
collection PubMed
description A comparative study on different enteric-coated hard capsules was performed. The influence of different formulation factors like choice of enteric polymer, triethyl citrate (TEC) concentration (plasticizer), talc concentrations (anti-tacking agent), and different coating process parameters on the sealing performance of the capsule and the disintegration time were investigated. Furthermore, the influence of different disintegration test methods (with disc vs. without disc and 50 mM U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) buffer pH 6.8 vs. biopredictive 15 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5) was evaluated. All formulations showed sufficient but not equivalent acid resistance when tested. Polymer type was the main factor influencing the capsule sealing and disintegration time. In addition, TEC and talc could affect the performance of the formulation. Regarding the choice of the disintegration test method, the presence of a disc had for the most part only limited influence on the results. The choice of disintegration buffer was found to be important in identifying differences between the formulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7465055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74650552020-09-04 In Vitro Evaluation of Enteric-Coated HPMC Capsules—Effect of Formulation Factors on Product Performance Fu, Maoqi Blechar, Johannes Andreas Sauer, Andreas Al-Gousous, Jozef Langguth, Peter Pharmaceutics Article A comparative study on different enteric-coated hard capsules was performed. The influence of different formulation factors like choice of enteric polymer, triethyl citrate (TEC) concentration (plasticizer), talc concentrations (anti-tacking agent), and different coating process parameters on the sealing performance of the capsule and the disintegration time were investigated. Furthermore, the influence of different disintegration test methods (with disc vs. without disc and 50 mM U.S. Pharmacopoeia (USP) buffer pH 6.8 vs. biopredictive 15 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5) was evaluated. All formulations showed sufficient but not equivalent acid resistance when tested. Polymer type was the main factor influencing the capsule sealing and disintegration time. In addition, TEC and talc could affect the performance of the formulation. Regarding the choice of the disintegration test method, the presence of a disc had for the most part only limited influence on the results. The choice of disintegration buffer was found to be important in identifying differences between the formulations. MDPI 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7465055/ /pubmed/32717908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12080696 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fu, Maoqi
Blechar, Johannes Andreas
Sauer, Andreas
Al-Gousous, Jozef
Langguth, Peter
In Vitro Evaluation of Enteric-Coated HPMC Capsules—Effect of Formulation Factors on Product Performance
title In Vitro Evaluation of Enteric-Coated HPMC Capsules—Effect of Formulation Factors on Product Performance
title_full In Vitro Evaluation of Enteric-Coated HPMC Capsules—Effect of Formulation Factors on Product Performance
title_fullStr In Vitro Evaluation of Enteric-Coated HPMC Capsules—Effect of Formulation Factors on Product Performance
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Evaluation of Enteric-Coated HPMC Capsules—Effect of Formulation Factors on Product Performance
title_short In Vitro Evaluation of Enteric-Coated HPMC Capsules—Effect of Formulation Factors on Product Performance
title_sort in vitro evaluation of enteric-coated hpmc capsules—effect of formulation factors on product performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12080696
work_keys_str_mv AT fumaoqi invitroevaluationofentericcoatedhpmccapsuleseffectofformulationfactorsonproductperformance
AT blecharjohannesandreas invitroevaluationofentericcoatedhpmccapsuleseffectofformulationfactorsonproductperformance
AT sauerandreas invitroevaluationofentericcoatedhpmccapsuleseffectofformulationfactorsonproductperformance
AT algousousjozef invitroevaluationofentericcoatedhpmccapsuleseffectofformulationfactorsonproductperformance
AT langguthpeter invitroevaluationofentericcoatedhpmccapsuleseffectofformulationfactorsonproductperformance