Cargando…

Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study

Presbyopia is increasing globally due to aging and the widespread use of visual display terminals. Presbyopia is a decrease in the eye’s amplitude of accommodation (AA) due to loss of crystalline lens elasticity. AA differs widely among individuals. We aimed to determine the factors that cause presb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubota, Miyuki, Kubota, Shunsuke, Kobashi, Hidenaga, Ayaki, Masahiko, Negishi, Kazuno, Tsubota, Kazuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082678
_version_ 1783577537877639168
author Kubota, Miyuki
Kubota, Shunsuke
Kobashi, Hidenaga
Ayaki, Masahiko
Negishi, Kazuno
Tsubota, Kazuo
author_facet Kubota, Miyuki
Kubota, Shunsuke
Kobashi, Hidenaga
Ayaki, Masahiko
Negishi, Kazuno
Tsubota, Kazuo
author_sort Kubota, Miyuki
collection PubMed
description Presbyopia is increasing globally due to aging and the widespread use of visual display terminals. Presbyopia is a decrease in the eye’s amplitude of accommodation (AA) due to loss of crystalline lens elasticity. AA differs widely among individuals. We aimed to determine the factors that cause presbyopia, other than advanced age, for early medical intervention. We examined 95 eyes of 95 healthy volunteers (33 men, 62 women) aged 22–62 years (mean: 37.22 ± 9.77 years) with a corrected visual acuity of ≥1.0 and without other eye afflictions except ametropia. Subjective refraction, AA, maximum and minimum pupillary diameters during accommodation, axial length of the eye, and crystalline lens thickness were measured. AA was measured using an auto refractometer/keratometer/tonometer/pachymeter. The difference between maximum and minimum pupillary diameters was calculated. On multiple regression analysis, age and difference in pupillary diameter were both significantly and independently associated with AA in participants aged <44 years, but not in those aged ≥45 years. Our results suggest that the difference in pupillary diameter could be an important age-independent factor for evaluating AA in healthy individuals without cataract. Thus, improving the difference in pupillary diameter values could be an early treatment target for presbyopia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7465210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74652102020-09-04 Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study Kubota, Miyuki Kubota, Shunsuke Kobashi, Hidenaga Ayaki, Masahiko Negishi, Kazuno Tsubota, Kazuo J Clin Med Article Presbyopia is increasing globally due to aging and the widespread use of visual display terminals. Presbyopia is a decrease in the eye’s amplitude of accommodation (AA) due to loss of crystalline lens elasticity. AA differs widely among individuals. We aimed to determine the factors that cause presbyopia, other than advanced age, for early medical intervention. We examined 95 eyes of 95 healthy volunteers (33 men, 62 women) aged 22–62 years (mean: 37.22 ± 9.77 years) with a corrected visual acuity of ≥1.0 and without other eye afflictions except ametropia. Subjective refraction, AA, maximum and minimum pupillary diameters during accommodation, axial length of the eye, and crystalline lens thickness were measured. AA was measured using an auto refractometer/keratometer/tonometer/pachymeter. The difference between maximum and minimum pupillary diameters was calculated. On multiple regression analysis, age and difference in pupillary diameter were both significantly and independently associated with AA in participants aged <44 years, but not in those aged ≥45 years. Our results suggest that the difference in pupillary diameter could be an important age-independent factor for evaluating AA in healthy individuals without cataract. Thus, improving the difference in pupillary diameter values could be an early treatment target for presbyopia. MDPI 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7465210/ /pubmed/32824849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082678 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kubota, Miyuki
Kubota, Shunsuke
Kobashi, Hidenaga
Ayaki, Masahiko
Negishi, Kazuno
Tsubota, Kazuo
Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study
title Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort difference in pupillary diameter as an important factor for evaluating amplitude of accommodation: a prospective observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082678
work_keys_str_mv AT kubotamiyuki differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kubotashunsuke differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kobashihidenaga differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ayakimasahiko differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT negishikazuno differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT tsubotakazuo differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy