Cargando…
Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study
Presbyopia is increasing globally due to aging and the widespread use of visual display terminals. Presbyopia is a decrease in the eye’s amplitude of accommodation (AA) due to loss of crystalline lens elasticity. AA differs widely among individuals. We aimed to determine the factors that cause presb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082678 |
_version_ | 1783577537877639168 |
---|---|
author | Kubota, Miyuki Kubota, Shunsuke Kobashi, Hidenaga Ayaki, Masahiko Negishi, Kazuno Tsubota, Kazuo |
author_facet | Kubota, Miyuki Kubota, Shunsuke Kobashi, Hidenaga Ayaki, Masahiko Negishi, Kazuno Tsubota, Kazuo |
author_sort | Kubota, Miyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Presbyopia is increasing globally due to aging and the widespread use of visual display terminals. Presbyopia is a decrease in the eye’s amplitude of accommodation (AA) due to loss of crystalline lens elasticity. AA differs widely among individuals. We aimed to determine the factors that cause presbyopia, other than advanced age, for early medical intervention. We examined 95 eyes of 95 healthy volunteers (33 men, 62 women) aged 22–62 years (mean: 37.22 ± 9.77 years) with a corrected visual acuity of ≥1.0 and without other eye afflictions except ametropia. Subjective refraction, AA, maximum and minimum pupillary diameters during accommodation, axial length of the eye, and crystalline lens thickness were measured. AA was measured using an auto refractometer/keratometer/tonometer/pachymeter. The difference between maximum and minimum pupillary diameters was calculated. On multiple regression analysis, age and difference in pupillary diameter were both significantly and independently associated with AA in participants aged <44 years, but not in those aged ≥45 years. Our results suggest that the difference in pupillary diameter could be an important age-independent factor for evaluating AA in healthy individuals without cataract. Thus, improving the difference in pupillary diameter values could be an early treatment target for presbyopia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7465210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74652102020-09-04 Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study Kubota, Miyuki Kubota, Shunsuke Kobashi, Hidenaga Ayaki, Masahiko Negishi, Kazuno Tsubota, Kazuo J Clin Med Article Presbyopia is increasing globally due to aging and the widespread use of visual display terminals. Presbyopia is a decrease in the eye’s amplitude of accommodation (AA) due to loss of crystalline lens elasticity. AA differs widely among individuals. We aimed to determine the factors that cause presbyopia, other than advanced age, for early medical intervention. We examined 95 eyes of 95 healthy volunteers (33 men, 62 women) aged 22–62 years (mean: 37.22 ± 9.77 years) with a corrected visual acuity of ≥1.0 and without other eye afflictions except ametropia. Subjective refraction, AA, maximum and minimum pupillary diameters during accommodation, axial length of the eye, and crystalline lens thickness were measured. AA was measured using an auto refractometer/keratometer/tonometer/pachymeter. The difference between maximum and minimum pupillary diameters was calculated. On multiple regression analysis, age and difference in pupillary diameter were both significantly and independently associated with AA in participants aged <44 years, but not in those aged ≥45 years. Our results suggest that the difference in pupillary diameter could be an important age-independent factor for evaluating AA in healthy individuals without cataract. Thus, improving the difference in pupillary diameter values could be an early treatment target for presbyopia. MDPI 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7465210/ /pubmed/32824849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082678 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kubota, Miyuki Kubota, Shunsuke Kobashi, Hidenaga Ayaki, Masahiko Negishi, Kazuno Tsubota, Kazuo Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study |
title | Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full | Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_short | Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_sort | difference in pupillary diameter as an important factor for evaluating amplitude of accommodation: a prospective observational study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082678 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kubotamiyuki differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT kubotashunsuke differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT kobashihidenaga differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT ayakimasahiko differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT negishikazuno differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT tsubotakazuo differenceinpupillarydiameterasanimportantfactorforevaluatingamplitudeofaccommodationaprospectiveobservationalstudy |