Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series

The objective was to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes of rehabilitations with root-analogue implants (RAIs). Patients restored with RAIs, supporting single crowns or fixed dental prostheses, were recruited for follow-up examinations. Besides clinical and esthetical evaluations, X-rays...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich, Hildebrand, Detlef, Beuer, Florian, Wesemann, Christian, Schwerdtner, Paul, Pieralli, Stefano, Spies, Benedikt Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082346
_version_ 1783577574363889664
author Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich
Hildebrand, Detlef
Beuer, Florian
Wesemann, Christian
Schwerdtner, Paul
Pieralli, Stefano
Spies, Benedikt Christopher
author_facet Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich
Hildebrand, Detlef
Beuer, Florian
Wesemann, Christian
Schwerdtner, Paul
Pieralli, Stefano
Spies, Benedikt Christopher
author_sort Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich
collection PubMed
description The objective was to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes of rehabilitations with root-analogue implants (RAIs). Patients restored with RAIs, supporting single crowns or fixed dental prostheses, were recruited for follow-up examinations. Besides clinical and esthetical evaluations, X-rays were taken and compared with the records. Patients were asked to evaluate the treatment using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). For statistical analyses, mixed linear models were used. A total of 107 RAIs were installed in one dental office. Of these, 31 were available for follow-up examinations. For those remaining, survival has been verified via phone. RAIs were loaded after a mean healing time of 6.6 ± 2.5 months. 12.1 ± 6.9 months after loading, a mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of 1.20 ± 0.73 mm was measured. Progression of MBL significantly decreased after loading (p = 0.013). The mean pink and white esthetic score (PES/WES) was 15.35 ± 2.33 at follow-up. A survival rate of 94.4% was calculated after a mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 2.4 months after surgery. Immediate installation of RAIs does not seem to reduce MBL, as known from the literature regarding screw-type implants, and might not be recommended for daily routine. Nevertheless, they deliver esthetically satisfying results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7465378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74653782020-09-04 Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich Hildebrand, Detlef Beuer, Florian Wesemann, Christian Schwerdtner, Paul Pieralli, Stefano Spies, Benedikt Christopher J Clin Med Article The objective was to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes of rehabilitations with root-analogue implants (RAIs). Patients restored with RAIs, supporting single crowns or fixed dental prostheses, were recruited for follow-up examinations. Besides clinical and esthetical evaluations, X-rays were taken and compared with the records. Patients were asked to evaluate the treatment using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). For statistical analyses, mixed linear models were used. A total of 107 RAIs were installed in one dental office. Of these, 31 were available for follow-up examinations. For those remaining, survival has been verified via phone. RAIs were loaded after a mean healing time of 6.6 ± 2.5 months. 12.1 ± 6.9 months after loading, a mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of 1.20 ± 0.73 mm was measured. Progression of MBL significantly decreased after loading (p = 0.013). The mean pink and white esthetic score (PES/WES) was 15.35 ± 2.33 at follow-up. A survival rate of 94.4% was calculated after a mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 2.4 months after surgery. Immediate installation of RAIs does not seem to reduce MBL, as known from the literature regarding screw-type implants, and might not be recommended for daily routine. Nevertheless, they deliver esthetically satisfying results. MDPI 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7465378/ /pubmed/32717843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082346 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich
Hildebrand, Detlef
Beuer, Florian
Wesemann, Christian
Schwerdtner, Paul
Pieralli, Stefano
Spies, Benedikt Christopher
Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series
title Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series
title_full Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series
title_short Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series
title_sort clinical outcomes of root-analogue implants restored with single crowns or fixed dental prostheses: a retrospective case series
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082346
work_keys_str_mv AT bosematswernfriedheinrich clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries
AT hildebranddetlef clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries
AT beuerflorian clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries
AT wesemannchristian clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries
AT schwerdtnerpaul clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries
AT pierallistefano clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries
AT spiesbenediktchristopher clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries