Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series
The objective was to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes of rehabilitations with root-analogue implants (RAIs). Patients restored with RAIs, supporting single crowns or fixed dental prostheses, were recruited for follow-up examinations. Besides clinical and esthetical evaluations, X-rays...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082346 |
_version_ | 1783577574363889664 |
---|---|
author | Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich Hildebrand, Detlef Beuer, Florian Wesemann, Christian Schwerdtner, Paul Pieralli, Stefano Spies, Benedikt Christopher |
author_facet | Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich Hildebrand, Detlef Beuer, Florian Wesemann, Christian Schwerdtner, Paul Pieralli, Stefano Spies, Benedikt Christopher |
author_sort | Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective was to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes of rehabilitations with root-analogue implants (RAIs). Patients restored with RAIs, supporting single crowns or fixed dental prostheses, were recruited for follow-up examinations. Besides clinical and esthetical evaluations, X-rays were taken and compared with the records. Patients were asked to evaluate the treatment using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). For statistical analyses, mixed linear models were used. A total of 107 RAIs were installed in one dental office. Of these, 31 were available for follow-up examinations. For those remaining, survival has been verified via phone. RAIs were loaded after a mean healing time of 6.6 ± 2.5 months. 12.1 ± 6.9 months after loading, a mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of 1.20 ± 0.73 mm was measured. Progression of MBL significantly decreased after loading (p = 0.013). The mean pink and white esthetic score (PES/WES) was 15.35 ± 2.33 at follow-up. A survival rate of 94.4% was calculated after a mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 2.4 months after surgery. Immediate installation of RAIs does not seem to reduce MBL, as known from the literature regarding screw-type implants, and might not be recommended for daily routine. Nevertheless, they deliver esthetically satisfying results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7465378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74653782020-09-04 Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich Hildebrand, Detlef Beuer, Florian Wesemann, Christian Schwerdtner, Paul Pieralli, Stefano Spies, Benedikt Christopher J Clin Med Article The objective was to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes of rehabilitations with root-analogue implants (RAIs). Patients restored with RAIs, supporting single crowns or fixed dental prostheses, were recruited for follow-up examinations. Besides clinical and esthetical evaluations, X-rays were taken and compared with the records. Patients were asked to evaluate the treatment using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). For statistical analyses, mixed linear models were used. A total of 107 RAIs were installed in one dental office. Of these, 31 were available for follow-up examinations. For those remaining, survival has been verified via phone. RAIs were loaded after a mean healing time of 6.6 ± 2.5 months. 12.1 ± 6.9 months after loading, a mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of 1.20 ± 0.73 mm was measured. Progression of MBL significantly decreased after loading (p = 0.013). The mean pink and white esthetic score (PES/WES) was 15.35 ± 2.33 at follow-up. A survival rate of 94.4% was calculated after a mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 2.4 months after surgery. Immediate installation of RAIs does not seem to reduce MBL, as known from the literature regarding screw-type implants, and might not be recommended for daily routine. Nevertheless, they deliver esthetically satisfying results. MDPI 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7465378/ /pubmed/32717843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082346 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Böse, Mats Wernfried Heinrich Hildebrand, Detlef Beuer, Florian Wesemann, Christian Schwerdtner, Paul Pieralli, Stefano Spies, Benedikt Christopher Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series |
title | Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of root-analogue implants restored with single crowns or fixed dental prostheses: a retrospective case series |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bosematswernfriedheinrich clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries AT hildebranddetlef clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries AT beuerflorian clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries AT wesemannchristian clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries AT schwerdtnerpaul clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries AT pierallistefano clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries AT spiesbenediktchristopher clinicaloutcomesofrootanalogueimplantsrestoredwithsinglecrownsorfixeddentalprosthesesaretrospectivecaseseries |