Cargando…
Long-Term Outcome of Epiretinal Membrane Surgery in Patients with Internal Limiting Membrane Dehiscence
Purpose: To identify the effect of internal limiting membrane (ILM) dehiscence on surgical outcomes in eyes that have undergone epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal. Methods: Consecutive eyes with performed vitrectomy for ERM removal were included. Subjects were divided into two groups: patients with I...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32752171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082470 |
Sumario: | Purpose: To identify the effect of internal limiting membrane (ILM) dehiscence on surgical outcomes in eyes that have undergone epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal. Methods: Consecutive eyes with performed vitrectomy for ERM removal were included. Subjects were divided into two groups: patients with ILM dehiscence (group 1) and without ILM dehiscence (group 2). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal layer thickness before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 86 eyes were enrolled. Forty-six eyes (53.5%) showed ILM dehiscence before surgery. The baseline BCVAs were 0.46 ± 0.29 and 0.45 ± 0.25 in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.801). The BCVAs at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery differed significantly between the two groups. The subfoveal thickness and inner retinal layer thickness (IRLT) of group 1 vs. 2 were 507.4 ± 80.0 vs. 417.6 ± 63.6 μm, and 270.2 ± 74.3 vs. 182.6 ± 60.4 μm, respectively (both p < 0.001). These differences between the groups remained significant until 12 months after surgery. In multivariate analyses, the location of ILM dehiscence (B = −0.105, p = 0.034) and final IRLT (B = 0.001, p = 0.046) were significant factors affecting the final BCVA. Conclusions: ILM dehiscence is a relatively common finding and associated with preoperative and postoperative increased IRLT, which results in worse surgical outcomes compared to the absence of ILM dehiscence in patients with ERM. Additionally, the final BCVA was significantly affected by its location and final IRLT in patients with ILM dehiscence. |
---|