Cargando…
An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer—Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The CarePath-CRC electronic clinical decision-making application was designed to assist physicians with evaluation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer (CRC). The physician completes an interactive checklist of evidence-based clinical parameters, and a recommended...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwz013 |
_version_ | 1783577612213288960 |
---|---|
author | Forbes, Nauzer Cooray, Mohan Hackett, Michael Shah, Nishwa Yuan, Yuhong Antiperovitch, Pavel Corner, Tracey Chan, David Mills, Michael Armstrong, David Xenodemetropoulos, Ted |
author_facet | Forbes, Nauzer Cooray, Mohan Hackett, Michael Shah, Nishwa Yuan, Yuhong Antiperovitch, Pavel Corner, Tracey Chan, David Mills, Michael Armstrong, David Xenodemetropoulos, Ted |
author_sort | Forbes, Nauzer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The CarePath-CRC electronic clinical decision-making application was designed to assist physicians with evaluation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer (CRC). The physician completes an interactive checklist of evidence-based clinical parameters, and a recommended referral urgency is generated based on the post-test probability of CRC. This study aimed toward validation of the tool in symptomatic patients presenting with rectal bleeding. METHODS: The medical records of a sample of patients with histologically confirmed CRC from 2010 to 2014 were reviewed. The CarePath-CRC tool was applied retrospectively to all patients who initially presented with rectal bleeding, to determine its sensitivity for detecting CRC in this population. A generated recommendation of ‘immediate referral’ (referral ≤24 hours, expected endoscopy ≤2 weeks) or ‘urgent referral’ (expected consultation and endoscopy ≤4 and ≤8 weeks) was considered a positive test result. An a priori sensitivity of 90% was deemed adequate, based on test characteristics of the tool’s individual clinical criteria. RESULTS: The tool was applied to 281 patients. A total of 69 (24.6%) and 211 (75.1%) patients met criteria for immediate and urgent referral, respectively. The remaining patient (0.4%) met criteria for ‘possible priority referral’, while none met criteria for ‘no specific action recommended’. This resulted in a calculated sensitivity of 99.6% (95% confidence interval 98.0 to 99.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The CarePath-CRC tool is sensitive in the prediction of CRC in patients presenting with rectal bleeding. A prospective cohort study is being designed to allow for acquisition of comprehensive test performance characteristics and full validation of the instrument. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7465547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74655472020-09-03 An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer—Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding Forbes, Nauzer Cooray, Mohan Hackett, Michael Shah, Nishwa Yuan, Yuhong Antiperovitch, Pavel Corner, Tracey Chan, David Mills, Michael Armstrong, David Xenodemetropoulos, Ted J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Original Articles BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The CarePath-CRC electronic clinical decision-making application was designed to assist physicians with evaluation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer (CRC). The physician completes an interactive checklist of evidence-based clinical parameters, and a recommended referral urgency is generated based on the post-test probability of CRC. This study aimed toward validation of the tool in symptomatic patients presenting with rectal bleeding. METHODS: The medical records of a sample of patients with histologically confirmed CRC from 2010 to 2014 were reviewed. The CarePath-CRC tool was applied retrospectively to all patients who initially presented with rectal bleeding, to determine its sensitivity for detecting CRC in this population. A generated recommendation of ‘immediate referral’ (referral ≤24 hours, expected endoscopy ≤2 weeks) or ‘urgent referral’ (expected consultation and endoscopy ≤4 and ≤8 weeks) was considered a positive test result. An a priori sensitivity of 90% was deemed adequate, based on test characteristics of the tool’s individual clinical criteria. RESULTS: The tool was applied to 281 patients. A total of 69 (24.6%) and 211 (75.1%) patients met criteria for immediate and urgent referral, respectively. The remaining patient (0.4%) met criteria for ‘possible priority referral’, while none met criteria for ‘no specific action recommended’. This resulted in a calculated sensitivity of 99.6% (95% confidence interval 98.0 to 99.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The CarePath-CRC tool is sensitive in the prediction of CRC in patients presenting with rectal bleeding. A prospective cohort study is being designed to allow for acquisition of comprehensive test performance characteristics and full validation of the instrument. Oxford University Press 2020-10 2019-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7465547/ /pubmed/32905126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwz013 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Forbes, Nauzer Cooray, Mohan Hackett, Michael Shah, Nishwa Yuan, Yuhong Antiperovitch, Pavel Corner, Tracey Chan, David Mills, Michael Armstrong, David Xenodemetropoulos, Ted An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer—Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding |
title | An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer—Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding |
title_full | An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer—Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding |
title_fullStr | An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer—Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding |
title_full_unstemmed | An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer—Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding |
title_short | An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer—Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding |
title_sort | electronic clinical decision-making tool for patients with suspected colorectal cancer—preliminary evaluation in patients presenting with rectal bleeding |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwz013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forbesnauzer anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT cooraymohan anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT hackettmichael anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT shahnishwa anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT yuanyuhong anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT antiperovitchpavel anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT cornertracey anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT chandavid anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT millsmichael anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT armstrongdavid anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT xenodemetropoulosted anelectronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT forbesnauzer electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT cooraymohan electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT hackettmichael electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT shahnishwa electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT yuanyuhong electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT antiperovitchpavel electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT cornertracey electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT chandavid electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT millsmichael electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT armstrongdavid electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding AT xenodemetropoulosted electronicclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforpatientswithsuspectedcolorectalcancerpreliminaryevaluationinpatientspresentingwithrectalbleeding |