Cargando…
Social distancing, population density, and spread of COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal study
BACKGROUND: The UK government introduced social distancing measures between 16–22 March 2020, aiming to slow down transmission of COVID-19. AIM: To explore the spreading of COVID-19 in relation to population density after the introduction of social distancing measures. DESIGN & SETTING: Longitud...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101116 |
_version_ | 1783577620068171776 |
---|---|
author | Tammes, Peter |
author_facet | Tammes, Peter |
author_sort | Tammes, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The UK government introduced social distancing measures between 16–22 March 2020, aiming to slow down transmission of COVID-19. AIM: To explore the spreading of COVID-19 in relation to population density after the introduction of social distancing measures. DESIGN & SETTING: Longitudinal design with 5-weekly COVID-19 incidence rates per 100 000 people for 149 English Upper Tier Local Authorities (UTLAs), between 16 March and 19 April 2020. METHOD: Multivariable multilevel model to analyse weekly incidence rates per 100 000 people; time was level-1 unit and UTLA level-2 unit. Population density was divided into quartiles. The model included an interaction between week and population density. Potential confounders were percentage aged ≥65, percentage non-white British, and percentage in two highest classes of the National Statistics Socioeconomic Classification. Co-variates were male life expectancy at birth, and COVID-19 prevalence rate per 100 000 people on March 15. Confounders and co-variates were standardised around the mean. RESULTS: Incidence rates per 100 000 people peaked in the week of March 30–April 5, showing higher adjusted incidence rate per 100 000 people (46.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 40.6 to 51.8) in most densely populated ULTAs (quartile 4) than in less densely populated ULTAs (quartile 1: 33.3, 95% CI = 27.4 to 37.2; quartile 2: 35.9, 95% CI = 31.6 to 40.1). Thereafter, incidence rate dropped in the most densely populated ULTAs resulting in rate of 22.4 (95% CI = 16.9 to 28.0) in the week of April 13–19; this was lower than in quartiles 1, 2, and 3, respectively 31.4 (95% CI = 26.5 to 36.3), 34.2 (95% CI = 29.9 to 38.5), and 43.2 (95% CI = 39.0 to 47.4). CONCLUSION: After the introduction of social distancing measures, the incidence rates per 100 000 people dropped stronger in most densely populated ULTAs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7465584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74655842020-09-10 Social distancing, population density, and spread of COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal study Tammes, Peter BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: The UK government introduced social distancing measures between 16–22 March 2020, aiming to slow down transmission of COVID-19. AIM: To explore the spreading of COVID-19 in relation to population density after the introduction of social distancing measures. DESIGN & SETTING: Longitudinal design with 5-weekly COVID-19 incidence rates per 100 000 people for 149 English Upper Tier Local Authorities (UTLAs), between 16 March and 19 April 2020. METHOD: Multivariable multilevel model to analyse weekly incidence rates per 100 000 people; time was level-1 unit and UTLA level-2 unit. Population density was divided into quartiles. The model included an interaction between week and population density. Potential confounders were percentage aged ≥65, percentage non-white British, and percentage in two highest classes of the National Statistics Socioeconomic Classification. Co-variates were male life expectancy at birth, and COVID-19 prevalence rate per 100 000 people on March 15. Confounders and co-variates were standardised around the mean. RESULTS: Incidence rates per 100 000 people peaked in the week of March 30–April 5, showing higher adjusted incidence rate per 100 000 people (46.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 40.6 to 51.8) in most densely populated ULTAs (quartile 4) than in less densely populated ULTAs (quartile 1: 33.3, 95% CI = 27.4 to 37.2; quartile 2: 35.9, 95% CI = 31.6 to 40.1). Thereafter, incidence rate dropped in the most densely populated ULTAs resulting in rate of 22.4 (95% CI = 16.9 to 28.0) in the week of April 13–19; this was lower than in quartiles 1, 2, and 3, respectively 31.4 (95% CI = 26.5 to 36.3), 34.2 (95% CI = 29.9 to 38.5), and 43.2 (95% CI = 39.0 to 47.4). CONCLUSION: After the introduction of social distancing measures, the incidence rates per 100 000 people dropped stronger in most densely populated ULTAs. Royal College of General Practitioners 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7465584/ /pubmed/32636204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101116 Text en Copyright © 2020, The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Research Tammes, Peter Social distancing, population density, and spread of COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal study |
title | Social distancing, population density, and spread of COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal study |
title_full | Social distancing, population density, and spread of COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal study |
title_fullStr | Social distancing, population density, and spread of COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal study |
title_full_unstemmed | Social distancing, population density, and spread of COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal study |
title_short | Social distancing, population density, and spread of COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal study |
title_sort | social distancing, population density, and spread of covid-19 in england: a longitudinal study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tammespeter socialdistancingpopulationdensityandspreadofcovid19inenglandalongitudinalstudy |