Cargando…

Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs

This study examined the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary allied health model of care (MOC) for cancer patients with complex needs. The MOC in this retrospective study provided up to eight weeks of nutritional counselling, exercise prescription, fatigue management and psychological sup...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ray, Hannah, Beaumont, Anna, Loeliger, Jenelle, Martin, Alicia, Marston, Celia, Gough, Karla, Bordia, Shilpa, Ftanou, Maria, Kiss, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082431
_version_ 1783577625008013312
author Ray, Hannah
Beaumont, Anna
Loeliger, Jenelle
Martin, Alicia
Marston, Celia
Gough, Karla
Bordia, Shilpa
Ftanou, Maria
Kiss, Nicole
author_facet Ray, Hannah
Beaumont, Anna
Loeliger, Jenelle
Martin, Alicia
Marston, Celia
Gough, Karla
Bordia, Shilpa
Ftanou, Maria
Kiss, Nicole
author_sort Ray, Hannah
collection PubMed
description This study examined the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary allied health model of care (MOC) for cancer patients with complex needs. The MOC in this retrospective study provided up to eight weeks of nutritional counselling, exercise prescription, fatigue management and psychological support. Implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, fidelity and appropriateness) were evaluated using nine patient interviews, and operational data and medical records of 185 patients referred between August 2017 and December 2018. Adoption, including intention to try and uptake, were acceptable: 88% of referred patients agreed to screening and 71% of eligible patients agreed to clinic participation. Fidelity was mixed, secondary to inpatient admissions and disease progression interrupting patient participation. Clinician compliance with outcome assessment was variable at program commencement (dietetic, 95%; physiotherapy, 91%; occupational therapy, 33%; quality of life, 23%) and low at program completion (dietetic, 32%; physiotherapy, 13%; occupational therapy, 10%; quality of life, 11%) mainly due to non-attendance. Patient interviews revealed high satisfaction and perceived appropriateness. Adoption of the optimisation clinic was acceptable. Interview responses suggest patients feel the clinic is both acceptable and appropriate. This indicates a multidisciplinary model is an important aspect of comprehensive, timely and effective care. However, fidelity was low, secondary to the complexities of the patient cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7465605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74656052020-09-04 Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs Ray, Hannah Beaumont, Anna Loeliger, Jenelle Martin, Alicia Marston, Celia Gough, Karla Bordia, Shilpa Ftanou, Maria Kiss, Nicole J Clin Med Article This study examined the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary allied health model of care (MOC) for cancer patients with complex needs. The MOC in this retrospective study provided up to eight weeks of nutritional counselling, exercise prescription, fatigue management and psychological support. Implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, fidelity and appropriateness) were evaluated using nine patient interviews, and operational data and medical records of 185 patients referred between August 2017 and December 2018. Adoption, including intention to try and uptake, were acceptable: 88% of referred patients agreed to screening and 71% of eligible patients agreed to clinic participation. Fidelity was mixed, secondary to inpatient admissions and disease progression interrupting patient participation. Clinician compliance with outcome assessment was variable at program commencement (dietetic, 95%; physiotherapy, 91%; occupational therapy, 33%; quality of life, 23%) and low at program completion (dietetic, 32%; physiotherapy, 13%; occupational therapy, 10%; quality of life, 11%) mainly due to non-attendance. Patient interviews revealed high satisfaction and perceived appropriateness. Adoption of the optimisation clinic was acceptable. Interview responses suggest patients feel the clinic is both acceptable and appropriate. This indicates a multidisciplinary model is an important aspect of comprehensive, timely and effective care. However, fidelity was low, secondary to the complexities of the patient cohort. MDPI 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7465605/ /pubmed/32751451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082431 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ray, Hannah
Beaumont, Anna
Loeliger, Jenelle
Martin, Alicia
Marston, Celia
Gough, Karla
Bordia, Shilpa
Ftanou, Maria
Kiss, Nicole
Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs
title Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs
title_full Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs
title_fullStr Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs
title_short Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs
title_sort implementation of a multidisciplinary allied health optimisation clinic for cancer patients with complex needs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082431
work_keys_str_mv AT rayhannah implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds
AT beaumontanna implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds
AT loeligerjenelle implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds
AT martinalicia implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds
AT marstoncelia implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds
AT goughkarla implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds
AT bordiashilpa implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds
AT ftanoumaria implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds
AT kissnicole implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds