Cargando…
Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs
This study examined the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary allied health model of care (MOC) for cancer patients with complex needs. The MOC in this retrospective study provided up to eight weeks of nutritional counselling, exercise prescription, fatigue management and psychological sup...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082431 |
_version_ | 1783577625008013312 |
---|---|
author | Ray, Hannah Beaumont, Anna Loeliger, Jenelle Martin, Alicia Marston, Celia Gough, Karla Bordia, Shilpa Ftanou, Maria Kiss, Nicole |
author_facet | Ray, Hannah Beaumont, Anna Loeliger, Jenelle Martin, Alicia Marston, Celia Gough, Karla Bordia, Shilpa Ftanou, Maria Kiss, Nicole |
author_sort | Ray, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examined the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary allied health model of care (MOC) for cancer patients with complex needs. The MOC in this retrospective study provided up to eight weeks of nutritional counselling, exercise prescription, fatigue management and psychological support. Implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, fidelity and appropriateness) were evaluated using nine patient interviews, and operational data and medical records of 185 patients referred between August 2017 and December 2018. Adoption, including intention to try and uptake, were acceptable: 88% of referred patients agreed to screening and 71% of eligible patients agreed to clinic participation. Fidelity was mixed, secondary to inpatient admissions and disease progression interrupting patient participation. Clinician compliance with outcome assessment was variable at program commencement (dietetic, 95%; physiotherapy, 91%; occupational therapy, 33%; quality of life, 23%) and low at program completion (dietetic, 32%; physiotherapy, 13%; occupational therapy, 10%; quality of life, 11%) mainly due to non-attendance. Patient interviews revealed high satisfaction and perceived appropriateness. Adoption of the optimisation clinic was acceptable. Interview responses suggest patients feel the clinic is both acceptable and appropriate. This indicates a multidisciplinary model is an important aspect of comprehensive, timely and effective care. However, fidelity was low, secondary to the complexities of the patient cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7465605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74656052020-09-04 Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs Ray, Hannah Beaumont, Anna Loeliger, Jenelle Martin, Alicia Marston, Celia Gough, Karla Bordia, Shilpa Ftanou, Maria Kiss, Nicole J Clin Med Article This study examined the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary allied health model of care (MOC) for cancer patients with complex needs. The MOC in this retrospective study provided up to eight weeks of nutritional counselling, exercise prescription, fatigue management and psychological support. Implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, fidelity and appropriateness) were evaluated using nine patient interviews, and operational data and medical records of 185 patients referred between August 2017 and December 2018. Adoption, including intention to try and uptake, were acceptable: 88% of referred patients agreed to screening and 71% of eligible patients agreed to clinic participation. Fidelity was mixed, secondary to inpatient admissions and disease progression interrupting patient participation. Clinician compliance with outcome assessment was variable at program commencement (dietetic, 95%; physiotherapy, 91%; occupational therapy, 33%; quality of life, 23%) and low at program completion (dietetic, 32%; physiotherapy, 13%; occupational therapy, 10%; quality of life, 11%) mainly due to non-attendance. Patient interviews revealed high satisfaction and perceived appropriateness. Adoption of the optimisation clinic was acceptable. Interview responses suggest patients feel the clinic is both acceptable and appropriate. This indicates a multidisciplinary model is an important aspect of comprehensive, timely and effective care. However, fidelity was low, secondary to the complexities of the patient cohort. MDPI 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7465605/ /pubmed/32751451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082431 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ray, Hannah Beaumont, Anna Loeliger, Jenelle Martin, Alicia Marston, Celia Gough, Karla Bordia, Shilpa Ftanou, Maria Kiss, Nicole Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs |
title | Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs |
title_full | Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs |
title_fullStr | Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs |
title_short | Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs |
title_sort | implementation of a multidisciplinary allied health optimisation clinic for cancer patients with complex needs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rayhannah implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds AT beaumontanna implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds AT loeligerjenelle implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds AT martinalicia implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds AT marstoncelia implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds AT goughkarla implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds AT bordiashilpa implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds AT ftanoumaria implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds AT kissnicole implementationofamultidisciplinaryalliedhealthoptimisationclinicforcancerpatientswithcomplexneeds |