Cargando…

Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay

(1) Background: Clinical metagenomics is a promising approach that helps to identify etiological agents in cases of unknown infections. For the efficient detection of an unknown pathogen, the extraction method must be carefully selected for the maximum recovery of nucleic acid from different microor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farraj, Suha A., El-Kafrawy, Shreif A., Kumosani, Taha A., Yousef, Jehad M., Azhar, Esam I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081128
_version_ 1783577649180835840
author Farraj, Suha A.
El-Kafrawy, Shreif A.
Kumosani, Taha A.
Yousef, Jehad M.
Azhar, Esam I.
author_facet Farraj, Suha A.
El-Kafrawy, Shreif A.
Kumosani, Taha A.
Yousef, Jehad M.
Azhar, Esam I.
author_sort Farraj, Suha A.
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Clinical metagenomics is a promising approach that helps to identify etiological agents in cases of unknown infections. For the efficient detection of an unknown pathogen, the extraction method must be carefully selected for the maximum recovery of nucleic acid from different microorganisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate different extraction methods that have the ability to isolate nucleic acids from different types of pathogens with good quality and quantity for efficient use in clinical metagenomic identification. (2) Methods: A mock sample spiked with five different pathogens was used for the comparative evaluation of different commercial extraction kits. Extracted samples were subjected to library preparation and run on MiSeq. The selected extraction method based on the outcome of the comparative evaluation was used subsequently for the nucleic acid isolation of all infectious agents in clinical respiratory samples with multiple infections. (3) Results: The protocol using the PowerViral(®) Environmental RNA-DNA Isolation Kit with a 5-min bead beating step achieved the best results with a low starting volume. The analysis of the tested clinical specimens showed the ability to successfully identify different types of pathogens. (4) Conclusions: The optimized extraction protocol in this study is recommended for clinical metagenomics application in specimens with multiple infections from different taxa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7465710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74657102020-09-04 Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay Farraj, Suha A. El-Kafrawy, Shreif A. Kumosani, Taha A. Yousef, Jehad M. Azhar, Esam I. Microorganisms Article (1) Background: Clinical metagenomics is a promising approach that helps to identify etiological agents in cases of unknown infections. For the efficient detection of an unknown pathogen, the extraction method must be carefully selected for the maximum recovery of nucleic acid from different microorganisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate different extraction methods that have the ability to isolate nucleic acids from different types of pathogens with good quality and quantity for efficient use in clinical metagenomic identification. (2) Methods: A mock sample spiked with five different pathogens was used for the comparative evaluation of different commercial extraction kits. Extracted samples were subjected to library preparation and run on MiSeq. The selected extraction method based on the outcome of the comparative evaluation was used subsequently for the nucleic acid isolation of all infectious agents in clinical respiratory samples with multiple infections. (3) Results: The protocol using the PowerViral(®) Environmental RNA-DNA Isolation Kit with a 5-min bead beating step achieved the best results with a low starting volume. The analysis of the tested clinical specimens showed the ability to successfully identify different types of pathogens. (4) Conclusions: The optimized extraction protocol in this study is recommended for clinical metagenomics application in specimens with multiple infections from different taxa. MDPI 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7465710/ /pubmed/32727010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081128 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Farraj, Suha A.
El-Kafrawy, Shreif A.
Kumosani, Taha A.
Yousef, Jehad M.
Azhar, Esam I.
Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay
title Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay
title_full Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay
title_fullStr Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay
title_short Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay
title_sort evaluation of extraction methods for clinical metagenomic assay
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081128
work_keys_str_mv AT farrajsuhaa evaluationofextractionmethodsforclinicalmetagenomicassay
AT elkafrawyshreifa evaluationofextractionmethodsforclinicalmetagenomicassay
AT kumosanitahaa evaluationofextractionmethodsforclinicalmetagenomicassay
AT yousefjehadm evaluationofextractionmethodsforclinicalmetagenomicassay
AT azharesami evaluationofextractionmethodsforclinicalmetagenomicassay